Search results

Some things just aren’t worth commenting on, such as going to great lengths to prove something that is biblically irrelevant.

Kirk to Enterprise: VERY FUNNY, Scotty - now beam down OUR CLOTHES, too!

Going to the moon would obviously violate the command: thou shalt not visit the moon.

It’s crystal clear the old covenant and with it the Decalogue, has ended, being purposely a bondage and a yoke of slavery by having to keep all 613 parts of the law for righteousness, as opposed to righteousness by faith and repentance in the new covenant.

The atonement is unlimited. Application of it is limited to WHOSOEVER WILL COME.

Moses says in Deuteronomy 5 where he gives the law, including the ten commands, that their father did not have that law. Paul also wrote that the law was not given to Moses until 430:years after Abraham

Peter called the law of Moses a yoke of bondage in Acts 15. Paul call it bondage and slavery in Galatians 4 And the ministry of death that kills, replaced by the ministry of the spirit.

See my reply to him where I prove that it calls the Decalogue the ministry of death. It was easy - I actually used the Bible, and posted it. 2Co 3:6 who has made us sufficient to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives...

It was written to a church putting themselves under the law of Moses. The old covenant is GONE the Decalogue is called THE COVENANT ON TABLES OF STONE- therefore the ten ended, replaced by the superior two love commands.

Get serious - there’s no misinterpretation at all - it blatantly says that the ministry of death was CARVED IN LETTERS ON STONE and mentions MOSES coming down from the mountain with his face glowing! That’s unequivocally talking about the Ten Commandments. 2Co 3:6 who has made us sufficient...

So where does the claim come from that Yahweh is the wrong version of YHWH?

I’m not the one insisting on keeping an ended ceremonial day of rest that was part of an ended covenant that Paul states brought bondage and slavery.

Try actually reading the passage instead of someone’s proof texts: Gal 4:21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not listen to the law? Gal 4:22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman. Gal 4:23 But the son of the slave was...

You sure don’t. Ellen G. White was a proven plagiarist - not a scholar.

You can try to spin the facts all you want - it’s crystal clear from Paul’s words in his letter TO THE CHURCH at Galatia, he was not writing to pagans: Gal 1:2 and all the brothers who are with me, To the churches of Galatia: Gal 3:1 O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before...

THE TWO LOVE COMMANDS VS THE DECALOGUE (TEN COMMANDS) The argument is frequently made that the two love commands just restate the ten commands, as if they are equivalent to each.other. This is not so. The first obvious difference is there are no days commanded to be kept in the two love...

The law of love, aka the law of Christ, aka the royal law, is to love your neighbor as yourself, thus every act of kindness to a neighbor, is fulfilling that command. Which is why the two love commands are far superior to the Decalogue, which has not one drop of love for your neighbor in it...

Read the book of Galatians. It was written to all the law keeping sabbatarians to correct their error. Read 2 Corinthians 3 where Paul calls the ten commands the ministry of death,the letter that kills, the ministry of condemnation, that he contrasts with the new covenant law of the spirit...

Your version of OSAS is refuteD by Jesus Himself in Revelation 3:16 where He rejects the lukewarm by spewing them out of His mouth, then goes on to tell that church at Sardis that they ARE DEAD, warns them to REPENT and warns them that he will blot their names from the book of life, if they...