Search results

I have all the tools needed. All you need is belief. Not elaborate excuses for unbelief.

No they would know God is not tricking us and that there is no reason not to believe what we were told. It was not offered as some great mystery. Having 'prophetical import' (in other words whatever you wish to make up) cannot take away from what were were told was in heaven.

Revelation 11:19 And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: It's already there why would I want to take it there? You can disbelieve in heaven and a temple in heaven and the ark in a temple in heaven all you like. Add the Millennium...

They should be ready to believe the bible. Revelation 11:19 And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: Believe it...or not.

So the first half of the seven years of the wrath of God then. Which trumpet? His voice that calls us up at the Rapture before this seven years is like a trumpet. The seventh trumpet sounds ending the rule of man and announcing the return of Christ. Revelation 11:15 And the seventh angel...

I am saying nothing like that. Just because beheading does not save people does not mean the tribulation is anything but the wrath of God and more terrible than any other time. That is why we are not appointed to wrath.

Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon...

In other words the bible uses the phrase twice and it is referring to Jews each time? Well, I would say it seems quite possible. However I would say we do not know. The phrase could apply in many situations as well today.

The length of the Tribulation is given repeatedly. It is in that time that the covenant exists. Completely false. No grace or salvation?? What a horrible thing to make up whole of cloth and preach as if it had the slightest semblance to truth. So you think basically that as far as a number of...

Explain why if he was say, from a Catholic heritage, and rejected the God of his fathers, that wouldn't work? How does the verse say exclusively Jewish?

The verse did not say that. So why do you?

I suppose you think that verse supports your claim. So let's say the leader was a Buddhist. That would mean his fathers worshiped Buddha. Etc etc etc. So we could perhaps say 'maybe he will be from Jewish origins'. That is not what you claim. You state it as fact.

Who asked where he would be from? He is of his father the devil. Why quibble over where he may have been born?

OK, you stated an opinion. Cheers

As explained I fixed the post for the sake of what may be appropriate on a forum. However, light is till light and darkness is darkness, and when people say things like Jesus is back and ruling and there is no millennium or rule on earth of Christ or Rapture etc etc etc, well, that simply is not...

I think that while Nero fiddled Rome was also controlled by Satan. The main thing is the focus of the prophesy, and that was around 70Ad when the city was destroyed. It seems obvious Satan was still in charge. So, the prince in charge then will also be in charge in the last kingdom. Think of the...

I have the whole bible. Try to get real.

Why would something need to be in a certain chapter you pick?

If anyone comprehends your confused utterances perhaps they have the wherewithal to articulate. Thanks

Either something is light or dark. What you posted was not light.