Search results

No takers!? No one who delights in Scripture above their own thoughts!?

So, according to you, every Christian in history walked after the flesh, not after the spirit, proven by the fact that they physically died, right?

I will regard topics raised by God.

Romans 8:12,13 says if the Christian walks after the flesh, they will die and not live. The passage doesn't say their sins will be imputed to Christ if they sin, it says they will be condemned and they will die--not just referring to physical death, either (that would mean every Christian in...

So, how is it relevant that sin is not counted when there is no Law if death still reigned, which would have implications for Christians (who are not under Law), which is exactly what Paul says Romans 8:12,13? You seem unacquainted with the material.

Not sure if you're aware, but that guy, "Arthur", is a radical "pro-LGBT" "Christian", so he's likely reading what you're saying in a completely different way than you're intending it. He's probably thinking, "Here is the proof that we can commit abominations--we're not under Law!"

Romans 5 12Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all mene because all sinned— 13for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even...

1. There were many instances where Christ said things that went completely over the Apostles' heads. 2. The Apostles may have thought Jesus meant--as the Pharisees misinterpreted, "'Where does this man intend to go that we will not find him? Does he intend to go to the Dispersion among the...

Since there is "no condemnation" for those in Christ (Ro 8:1), why is the sinning Christian "condemned" (Ro 14:23)? My way of reconciling these is simply recognizing that not all remain in Christ: remaining requires obeying God's commands (i. believe, and ii. walk in love (Jn 15; 1 Jn...

God is my Witness, that's what I strive for and BEG and PLEAD God for constantly.

Told ya it would only be a short while!

The Scripture is getting lonely, how could you do that to the Scripture? Lots of empty talk, no answer for the Scripture. Poor Scripture! Look how many words you use, but how none of them regard the challenge to your ignorance! Answer why the guy who is forgiven his debt, which is only by...

Blah, blah, blah... lots of words, but no answer for the Scripture that debunks your ignorance! Run away, now, and let the conversation pick back up from where you took it off track!

Isn't that "convenient"! My post all of a sudden "makes no sense" when you can't answer it! Tell me which part of it I used a foreign language to make my point. Tell me which part of it makes no sense. Surely you could explain!

Laugh all you'd like, but you can't answer the Scripture--because you don't believe Scripture, you believe your lop-sided hysterical ignorant misunderstanding of it. Ecclesiastes 7 6For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fools; this also is vanity.

Answer why the guy who is forgiven his debt, which is only by faith in Christ, which means he is born of God, can sin (which you say cannot occur) enough to make God "unforgive" his debt and throw him in hell, meaning the guy is no longer in Christ meaning he isn't born of God. Can't do it, can...

Hopefully we can get back on topic now. How do you reconcile Romans 8:1 with Romans 14:23?

LOL That's right, run away from God's Word. You cannot account for Matthew 18, among many other passages and verses of Scripture, because your understanding of John is flawed. You do not have a single coherent thing to say. The entire Bible militates against your ignorance.

The question remains: if your understanding of John's doctrine is correct, how is it that Jesus teaches that someone can be forgiven their debt (that is, by faith in Christ, making them born again), but, then, sin (they sinned--contrary to your mangling of God's Word) by not forgiving, and then...

LOL! The topic has been changed by the hysteria of @Ritajanice. Sorry for anyone who actually wanted to hear about Ro 8:1 and 14:23. It will only be a short while before RitaJanice is answered and we can move back on topic.