Search results

This is incredible! I know some people don't want the stress of 'going pro' with their work, as they do it to relax...but if you're not trying to make money because you don't think you're good enough...I don't think it's a worry you need to have!

The Trinity. Sure. What about it? Are you saying that 'mankind', both men and women, can determine all that we 'need' to about ourselves within the nature of the Trinity itself? Because, while undoubtably there is 'truth' in that statement, it seems to be both a massive overstatement in terms of...

That's all swell, but still doesn't give me much to go on in regards to his post.

How am I doing that? What I am attempting to show, is that there will be some continuity between us now, and us then...just as there was with Christ. He still had the wounds in his hands and side. They still recognized him as Jesus. He still ate food, as he had previously. There will be parts of...

Yeah...sorry. Don't understand what you're saying here. Genesis doesn't say that God created them and named "them" "Adam". It says he created male and female, then says the man was called Adam. The woman is not named until 3:20, when Adam names her himself. I can't say I've done any great study...

You're not making much sense, I'm afraid. Yes, clearly Christ was still physical when he told Thomas to touch him, but this was after he told Mary not to. I've never implied he was not physical...at either of these points, actually. But att the time he was talking to Thomas he was doing all...

Context doesn't matter? Riiight. o_O Look! There's an open window! Let's throw all proper biblical interpretation out of it!

Look, if you want to take a verse way out of context and apply to eternity, go right ahead. But you are, undoubtably, wrong about what Gal 3:28 means, sorry. Jesus is not talking about eternity, he is talking about breaking down the barriers of sex, education, race, career, whatever else you can...

In regards to doctrine and things that the bible definitely reveals, yeah, sure. But, I don't know that it hurts to speculate a little about what it doesn't talk about in regards to eternity. As long as our speculations don't run towards sinful things and realise that our hopes and dreams for it...

Wait....Christ was resurrected in his physical earthly body? I think you are ignoring all the things we see Christ do in his resurrected body. The things Paul points to and tells us that Christ is the firstfruits that we can look to. Granted the Holy Spirit could have allowed Christ to do many...

Why shouldn't we?

Gal 3:28 is not talking about that, your taking it way out of context. WAY. Ditto the verse about being like the angels. Check out my answer to Treckson on the same, so I don't have to re-type it. And sure. Genders aren't a big deal. Who needs genders. It's not like they play a part in who we...

Well, true, but that, of course, goes both ways! It's true there is a fine line. Like...all Dispensationalists are Premillennials, but not all Premillennials are Dispensationalists! I think when it comes to something like Preterists its even murkier, if you forgive the phrase, because the...

Uh,huh. Don't you think that's stretching it...just a bit? Your either going to great lengths to fit your hypothesis in there, or your doing John a fairly great disservice in his ability to describe stuff, I think.

Gal 3:28 is not about our future of being sexless! It's about how God sees us all equal! That he doesn't weigh gender or race or job status into it when he looks at those who are his. If you are in Christ, you are one...saved and loved! But other than that, it is all speculation, and I believe...

Huh....interesting thought. Good thought. It'll be cool to find out if you're right!

But isn't that just assuming that when the fall happened our digestive systems just sort of sprung into being? That God added our intestines etc... There's nothing in scripture that suggests our bodies were modified in this way after the fall. The only mention of a change was that childbirth...

Well, true, it doesn't specifically say 'angelic beings'. But, well...angels do dwell in the heavens. Unless we are to believe that he is talking about the sort of 'body' we have in the intermediate state, which he could well be doing, I still think the category of 'heaven', in the present...

That's interesting. I wonder if Jesus would come to us in our dreams. I've often wondered how we'll get to see him as much as we want. God is everywhere, but if Jesus is still in his resurrected, physical body, which we have no reason to suspect otherwise, then can he be in multiple places at...

I'm going to have to disagree, based on 1 Cor 15. It says that the first Adam was a man of dust, a man from the earth. But the second Adam (who came as a man of the earth) became a life-giving spirit. Paul is talking about Christ's resurrection body here. And while Christ's new body could do...