Search results

Not sure what you mean about OSAS.

I don't deny that people who disagree with what I'm saying can know God--God doesn't wait for our theology to be perfect to reveal Himself to us--but I'm not interested in sharing the beliefs of the Christians of many different stripes, all with opposing views, all with damnations for one...

Look at this guy actually trying to argue against Paul the Apostle. How ludicrous. To answer your ridiculous ignorance, yes, if you take a shower, and it's not taken in faith, you are sinning. When you are acting, acting in faith is the only way to reveal God's righteousness. If you're not...

She'd be greatly helped if she ate Natto. It has a lot of Vitamin K2, which puts calcium in the bones. K2 supplements are unreliable. You'd have to find one that worked. That's why I prefer Natto.

To clarify: 1 Jn 2:28 warns the "children" (spiritually immature) to remain in Christ or else they will be ashamed and shrink back at the return of Christ. 1 Jn 3:23,24 teaches how to remain in Christ--obey His commands to believe in Jesus's Name, and love one another. To the degree someone...

I'm not going to fall into your drama. 1. Salvation, as I've proven, doesn't encompass what you dream it encompasses. Separately, yep, salvation isn't of works. Never said it was. 2. When someone walks by faith, that is God's righteousness, not "works" whereby one establishes their own...

So, again, Adam sinned himself out of what God gave him. Which disproves your point. You can sling as much mud as you want, but you're utterly incapable of addressing the Scripture. I invite the readers to do so, and see if what you're saying is true. I find all of your responses to be...

No, if that were your point, you wouldn't have kept using an already-answered reply, you would've interacted with the replies already supplied. 1. You're not addressing the point I made. I said you were mixing apples and oranges of the Law's ministry. You are confusing things. 2. I never said...

Nope. The "shrinking back" the word would refer to would be the same as mentioned in Hebrews 10:38 and 1 Jn 2:28. Otherwise, it's figuratively used to refer to "hesitation"--hence basic unanimity of translating it "doubt" across versions. I haven't read a translation that translates it as you...

The condemnation was bc of slavery to sin, but they're freed from slavery to Sin in Christ (Ro 8:2) so that IF they walk after the Spirit they fulfill the righteous requirement of the Law (Ro 8:4), and live, but IF they walk after the flesh they will die (Ro 8:12,13). This is the same principle...

Yet the Christian who sins is condemned. This must mean he's not abiding "in Christ". I've cited many verses that teach that reality. You're free to respond to those whenever you please.

You're not addressing the issue. Not interested in games.

You have no answer: sounds good. 1 John 2:28 debunks the idea that all Christians remain in Christ. 1 John 3:23,24 says how to remain. 1 John 5:21 says idols draw the immature away from Christ. Galatians 1:6 says the believers were deserting God. Galatians 5:3 says they were severed from...

Nope, there's also "a righteousness of my own from the Law". Assuming they're remaining in Christ--which, denying it is a possibility they may not remain, is begging the question. That's already been debunked by Romans 14:23.

1. They are "destroyed" and "condemned". You say, "It's OK, because it's not real". 2. No, they are condemned by God, because "to the one who believes something is unclean for him IT IS UNCLEAN", so that person is actually condemned, because he isn't doing what he fully believes is correct, and...

There are no unbelievers in view, with respect to instructions he's giving on how Christians are to be living, in Romans 14. The one who does what he does not believe is not in faith, thus he is condemned. It's really interesting to see the wheels fall off the OSASer's buses when they actually...

You're bringing up the issue of "works". When Paul reprimands the Galatians for trying to be justified by the works of the Law, his solution to their error is NOT "faith in Christ alone"; he delivers them from the Law over to doing good works by faith, "faith working through love", "through...

So, why is the Christian "condemned"? By your own logic, he's not abiding in Christ. Yet the Christian is "condemned". "It's just eating--it's not a big deal." What was it that Adam did to plunge the world into damnation? No, the context is that the rule Christians live by is "let every man...

Romans 14:23 says the Christian who sins is "condemned", so they must not be abiding in Christ, as I've argued.

I hoped to interact with dissenters, but is there anyone who agrees?