Search results

Since when is asking at theological question "stupid and rude"?? YOU'RE the one who refuses to answer it. You simply have NO Scriptural proof for your false doctrine. That's what I thought . . .

No – you ARE as Sola Scripturist who demands explicit Scriptural proof for everything. You believe that Scripture is our SOLE Authority. Now – why do you keep RUNNING from this question?? Is is that your entire theology collapses with this false doctrine? That’s a foolish response. We’re not...

NOT every aspect of an OT Type needs to be followed to the letter in its NT Fulfillment. Moses is an OT type of Jesus. - Was Moses’ mother a virgin?? - When was Moses executed? - When did Moses Resurrect from the dead? There are similarities between the two – but not EVERY aspect. Mary was the...

WRING. Peter said it was also for their children - period (Acts 2:39). And 8-day-old babies didn't have the faith OR the menta capacity to enter into a Covenant with God through curcumcision. GOD made an allowance for the parents to speak for their children to enter the Covenant. If YOU have a...

Ahh – so you don’t even believe in the Triune Godhead?? That explains a LOT . . . Ther is ONE God manifested in TREE distinct Persons. I have DOZENS of verses that PROVE the Triune Godhead (Trinity). I’ll take it easy on you and provide you with just THREE . . . The Father is God Ephesians...

So, you have NO argument. That’s pretty much what I figured . . . As I reminded you before – the core doctrine of Christianity, the Trinity is NOT mentioned in Scripture. Does that make it “untrue” – OR is it implicitly taught? Now – why don’t YOU show me where Sola Scriptura is mentioned in...

I ALREADY made this argument. I stated clearly that t is not explicitly mentioned. It IS, however, implicitly mentioned (Acts 10:1-49, 11:13-14, Acts 16:23-33, 1 Cor. 1:16). And, while we’re at it – the word “Trinity” doesn’t appear either, yet it is the basic tenet of the Christian faith...

NOT every Christian doctrine is explicitly taught in Scripture. For example – the Trinity is implicitly taught but is not explicitly mentioned. Infant Baptism is also implicitly taught in Scripture. When Peter baptized Cornelius the Centurion, he baptized his entire household including children...

And nothing you/ve posted refutes my position. My point ALL along is that Mary is the fulfillment of the Ark of the Covenant. The Woman in Rev. 12 1 is the Ark in Heaven. The description begins in Rev. 11: Rev 11:19 Then God's temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be...

No - just exposing your LIES again YOU claimed that they were forbidden to marry . . . WRONG again. It has nothing to do with countries or locations. Priestly celibacy is a discipline not a doctrine - in the Roman/Latin Rite Church. WRONG, sparky . . . Gnosticism was a FIRST century det of...

WRONG. There are MANY married priests in the Eastern Rites. Do your homework . . . And for anybody who knows first century history – they understand that he was talking about the Gnostic heretics and NOT his fellow Catholics. 1 Tim 4:3 They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain...

That was my poin ALL along. Mary already gave birth to the Messiah, Jesus. Satan and his agels were already cast out of Heaven. NOT sure where you're going with this.

WOW - you made the SAME blunder as @Ronald Nolette. Anti-Catholic ignorance and cluelessness must be contagious . . .

As I have already educated you – “Firstborn” in Jewish culture simply refers to “he who opens the womb.” Exod. 13:1 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Consecrate to Me all the firstborn, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and beast; it is Mine.” It’s a Hebrew...

First of all – NOT everything in Revelation is a “future” event. MANY things have already come to pass. The Woman in Rev. 12 gives birth to the Messiah (“who will rule all the nations with an iron scepter”), who was “snatched up to God and to his throne.” He came out of Isreal – more...

No – I write it – YOU get confused . . . Thank you for exposing your ignorance once again. Almost nobody calls him “Pope”. Most people refer to him as “Pope” – but they don’t address him as that. In any case -it is NOT a “de facto” official title, Einstein . . .

This is ANYTHING but “explicit”. Your failure to understand Scripture is your folly. Let’s look at the origin of the word, “Firstborn”. Exod. 13:1 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Consecrate to Me all the firstborn, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and...

Ummm, first of all – Luke, who was a Gentile, not Jewish, wrote one of the Gospel accounts as well as Acts. Secondly - the early Jewish Christians weren’t operating under the mantle of Jewish Scriptural authority. They were IN CHRIST. Finally, in Christ – Gal. 3:28 There is neither Jew nor...

Ummm, I hate to be the one to break this to you but – They were all CHRISTIANS. The New Testament came out of the CHRISTIAN Church – not the Jews. This is pretty basic stuff. The Jews don’t take credit for the NT . . .

The Jews gave us the New Testament?? Can you show me proof of this?