Search results

Compassion is something this world needs more of. But why would you subscribe to the wisdom of the likes on Clinton in the first place?

It is not just death it is the second death. That would have different connotations. If you think there isn't proof that hell is an eternal place of torment than you don't believe scripture. Revelation 14:11 The smoke of their torment will rise forever and ever, and they will have no relief...

Example of adding salt?

But you see about your other point on preaching sin, you can preach sin all day with loads of compassion.

Yes, the good news must be preached but the whole gospel including sin must be taught along with it and today the concept of sin is avoided instead of taught. Churches need to be teaching sin along with the gospel message as it's a core part of it. And a message that isn't loving is not the...

Either the 2nd A is a good thing to preach or it isn't. Who's to say too much and when is it too much? Also, No one is preaching eye for an eye so we can throw that one out.

Example of verbal stones?

I'm in agreement with that. In fact, preaching that sin is harmfull is exactly what I've been saying we need to do.

I see what you mean but I DO understand my conclusions about hell. Which are that it's 1 a literal place 2 eternal & 3 a place of torment. I just mean that it's hard to understand the concept of being dead but still existing.

We don't understand heaven. So is that to say we can't trust heaven as a divinely inspired precept?

DNB I was trying to say that I understand my conclusions about what hell is based on scripture. The thing we can't comprehend is the concept of the second death or what it means to be dead but still exist. I'm sorry to frustrate you, I struggle with communication. Lol.

You are again taking me out of context. Our minds can't comprehend it because of our limited perspective, that is not to say that it's incomprehensible.

It is easy to distinguish between literal and literary device. Drink his blood is obviously NOT literal. Hell is obviously literal.

Hold on. I didn't say anything was incomprehensible. I said we can't comprehend it because of our limited understanding that doesnt mean it to be incomprehensible.

It's best to interpret scripture how it was intended. There is plenty of literal in scripture. Once you allagorize scripture you get on your way down a slipery slope to making it mean anything you want it to say.

I didn't say it was illogical, since we exist in a different realm than hell, we have a limited understanding of what it means, however we can always rely on scripture and my conclusion is based on scripture.

Dude, all debate aside, it is comical that you put Trump on the same short list as Hitler and Stalin. Lol.

So could you illustrate for us a modern day version of this type of judgement so we can apply the scripture you posted? Thanks.

From Galations 1. [1] Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised himfrom the dead;) ... [9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any manpreach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Paul would be...

"If" any professing Christians are against the gospel message concerning sin in the church "maybe" it would be good for them to leave so to not contaminate the flock.