Search results

Welcome to the conundrums of God. In 525 BC, God intentionally spoke the 70 week prophecy in that manner. Not for reasons to reveal it to all, of WHEN the Messiah was to come, but to ONLY those at that time, who would be living in faith of "the Promise that was to come". Now, for all of us who...

I would like to interject here, and remind all who are involved in this discussion to restudy Zech. 4:11-14, being that of the JOINT ministry of John the Baptist and Jesus. [14] Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the LORD of the whole earth. We are not looking at Jesus...

Don't get ahead of yourself. Without the sacrifice of Christ and the restoration of His mortal body into New Life, God the Father could not ever permanently dwell within any one of us, being that of both the Old Covenant and the New, except that He permanently dwell within the restored immortal...

Unfortunately, you have not understood ALL OF 1 Cor. Ch. 2. Especially verse 5. As you have clearly shown, by your own sharp words of dissent towards me, you have proved that "My faith does NOT stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power [authority] of God", aka "the mind of Christ".

I'm sure all here understand what I said, albeit I did not quote the literal words verbatim. But, since you are correct in your point, then you should also clearly understand that the HANDS of Israel were directly involved with the "shedding of Christ's innocent blood". Hopefully for your sake...

You are welcome. One must always remember, that when Jesus pointed to Daniel about "the abomination that maketh desolate", He was understanding that it was a literal fulfilled prophecy. Therefore, once a prophecy has been fulfilled, it cannot be fulfilled again, but it can be used in typology...

Due to human error of recording past events, any attempt to align biblical prophecy with the actual history, could be off just a little bit of maybe only 1.0 percent. "We know in part"- 1 Cor. 13:9-12. However overall, the accuracy is derived from the tools of correct measurements, being that...

When did I deny the Lord's sudden and Glorious return in flaming fire? KJV 2 Thes. 1:7-10. If you read it in the KJV, you may be surprised to discover that those TWO events of "when" it shall take place, will be simultaneous. However, it is still necessary to discern the depth of God's words in...

Unfortunately, you are not discerning the difference between "the mind of Christ" within you, from that of your own "natural mind". Please see KJV Isa. 55:8-9; all of 1 Cor. ch. 2, especially verse 5. The parable of "the strong man" says it ALL. There is a saying: "To the victor, go the spoils...

You have not understood how Jesus is like a thief in the night ever since Pentecost. See the synopsis of the parables of "the strong man", beginning in Luke 11:21. Nope! You misunderstand that spiritual Israel is Heavenly Jerusalem (the inner court), and Jerusalem which now is, is the (outer...

There are only three possibilities of that which could be earthen. 1. This present old earth. 2. A future new earth. 3. What Jesus inherited, that no one else has yet inherited, ever since the day of his bodily resurrection.. His promise: John 14 [2] In my Father's house are many mansions: if...

Since Jesus has already received his kingdom, we must take seriously that it really is not now of this world, nor shall it ever be. John 18 [36] Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the...

Yes, you are somewhat correct. Jesus' reply, as to a sign that the Pharisees asked of him, was very direct. In John 2:18-21, Jesus was speaking about the temple of His mortal, flesh and "blood" body that was going to be destroyed, but would be resurrected back to New Life, and thus He would...

You wrote: "Luke 21 mentions zero about any AOD. You are adding to the text since some of that is meaning what happened during the events involving 70 AD, except none of those events involved an AOD." Which temple?? Maybe it's simply the fact that most Christians are being led astray by...

That is not the point. The point is the OT. Prophecies are about Jesus and John the baptist, not the church. John 5:39; Isa. 40:3-5; Mal. 4:5.

To be "anointed", is to have the Holy Spirit of God. Of all people in both the OC and the NC., only John the Baptist had the Holy Spirit while in his mother's womb, and Jesus, as we all know, was conceived by the Holy Spirit of God. One can not get anymore anointed than that. As the scriptures...

Nice try. If we are to interpret Zech. 4:14 that way, then why did you neglect to include the 144,000 of OC. Israel, who lived in faith of "the promise that was to come". John 5 [39] Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Zech. 4 [11] Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these two olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick and upon the left side thereof? [12] And I answered again, and said unto him, What be these two olive branches which through the two golden pipes empty the golden oil out of...

I see that you are spinning around the concept of John and Jesus being a joint ministry, hoping to not agree with it, but fearing that you should not deny it. Though you know the scriptures as much as I, you must consider that Zech. 4:14 is specific about only two "anointed" beings as...

You said in your post #398: "Artaxerxes ratified the decree again in his seventh year. According to the Hebrew calendar, this date was 457 BC, and Ezra says it happened on the “first day of the first month in the seventh year of King Artaxerxes.” Now, when we count forward 483 years from 1 Nisan...