Search results

Faith reunites the broken branches back to the root, which is the Abrahamic Covenant, not Jesus. That they are brought into a saving relationship with Jesus as a result, yes. That Jesus Christ is part of Israel, yes. He is related to them physically and is their King. The Church as the...

Why? Stranger

No Mary. Everyone that commits a sin is not a non-believer. Yes Mary. One can still be a sinner and be a Christian. I didn't say a homosexual cannot come to Christ. Your circular argument is of your own making. If a homosexual comes to Jesus Christ, then he is born-again, and is no...

No, the root is not Israel. Israel is the branches just like the believing Gentiles are branches. The root would be the Abrahamic Covenant. Out of which comes both the Church and the Nation of Israel. Israel is the natural branches and the believing Gentiles are the wild branches. Still two...

The Church does not replace Israel. And the Church never was or is Israel. Israel's true identity is 'Israel'. The Body that God created is the Church. Not Israel. Each body is composed of believers, but each body is distinct from each other. Stranger

No, this is very wrong. Our own righteousness is not imputed to us. It is what we have. And is as filthy rags. God's righteousness is also His. It is not imputed to Him. God imputes His righteousness to us, covering us. But it is not our righteousness, ever. Never will be. That is...

The only liar here is you. And worse, you don't admit lies and ignorance. You just continue your rude bullying method hoping it all goes away. As I have said, you are a credit to the pope and the papacy. I have given you proof already from the Scripture concerning Abraham and Adam and Eve...

You read about James death. And there was no action to replace him. That is what you read. No apostolic succession. I have repeatedly showed you where Abraham acknowledged believing and being the father of many nations. The same is true with Eve knowing and believing she was the mother...

Again, the statement of Clements doesn't hide your ignorance of not knowing the difference between James the disciple and James the Lords brother and head of the Jerusalem Church. Exactly right, Clements is not inspired. So, stick with Scripture. I understand history, I just don't put...

No kidding, Eintstein. That is why I referenced Adam and Eve. Which you said you never gave anything regarding Adam and Eve. post (#182). Which once again shows your ignorance. That you didn't know the difference between the James of (Acts 12) and the James who was head of the Church...

Yes, I believe we are in the end times. I certainly do know how it is going to go. But along the way I do not let the evil have its way without resisting, and all that may entail. Just as I believe the doctrine of election. But I witness every chance I get. I do my part. I let God do His...

You say I didn't put (Rom. 1:21-26) in context. Yet you do not explain the context to disprove it. Why? Homosexuality has it's origin first in the rejection of God. (Rom. 1:21) Being a homosexual speaks to ones nature. To say one is a homosexual and a Christian is an oxymoron...

I don't think we always have to be 'good with politics'. We know what is right and wrong and are willing to voice our opinion about it. And then prepare for when the national overall political opinion turns against us and takes action against us. Stranger

We do our part and vote. There will come a day when the vote will go against not just us, as Christians, but against conservatives who are not Christians. The political divide is so great that the politicians are already divided. Just like with our past War between the States, there will...

Yes, the only law Adam was under was in caring for the garden. Which law he broke, making him a transgressor. This awakened his conscience to know good and evil. (Gen. 3:22) Thus now man would walk according to his conscience. Not by any law. (Gen. 3:14-19) is God passing judgement on...

That will be fine. I will let you start it. I will participate when I can. Stranger

Adam was not created under any old covenant. There was no covenant when he was created. He later was placed under a law concerning the garden. Yes, then when Adam sin, his sin was a transgression. Because he sinned against law. That is the whole point Paul is making then in (Rom. 5:14)...

(Rom. 4:15) doesn't say that. It says, "where no law is, there is no transgression". Neither does (Rom. 5:13) say that. It says, "until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law" (1 John 3:4) "sin is the transgression of the law." When there is Law...

No. Sin was not imputed to Adam. How silly. Adam sinned. When there is law, then sin is transgression. When there is no law, even though there is sin, there is no transgression. (Rom. 5:13-14) is clear. From Adam to Moses there was no Law. Which means there was no transgression...

Not at all sister, I would never laugh at a believer I know was seeking the truth. We differ on the end time events and methods of interpretation but that doesn't mean we are enemies. Though I'm sure I come across that way at times. Amillennialist's have been great defenders of the faith in...