Search results

Hi Joseph, He has posted that belief before? Or are you just reading between the lines? Curious Mary

Hi mjrhealth, Are you associated with or a member of or adhere to or do you like what they teach at aggressivechristianity.net???? Curious Mary

Lol.....You say “no offense” but then go on and (try) to offend me with an insult o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O I am not the only one on this forum that has made it clear to you that you never really answer questions AND when you do answer it is a confusing mish mash of words that make no sense. Soooooo PLEASE...

That is true. You did state it was your opinion of which you give A LOT on this forum. Do you ever come to a conclusion and tell the rest of us on this forum what Catholics and Protestants get right? YES...you do...all the time. You have made it VERY clear how Catholic teaching is wrong...

I follow “the revealed doctrine “ of Cephas ;)

i dont know bcause u never rlly anser my qstns.....butt im used to that

It is not MY belief. It is the 2,000 year teaching of Christianity. But being a Christian I suspect you already knew that

:rolleyes: WOW....so your the ONE who knows what is “right” when interpreting scripture :rolleyes:

Well, at least I don’t write like one. Back to the subject at hand. Paul understood that when we eat/drink we participate in His body/blood.....why don’t you understand that?

I sincerely apologize....I don’t understand what you are trying to convey!

Your ignorance of scripture astounds me. Eucharist, which in Greek is eucharistia, means thanksgiving. Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, ..... He TOLD us to do this in remembrance of Him.....Christians still do this 2000 years later. Sooo do you give thanks??

Thank you pope bbyrd

He was literally talking about flesh and blood....that is why they walked away. If he changes it to spiritual flesh in that one passage it would be COMPLETELY out of context and would make him a very confusing teacher ....he wasn’t a confusing teacher. Several years later Even Paul knew that...

Contrast his listeners’ reaction when Jesus said he was a “door” or a “vine.” Nowhere do we find anyone asking, “How can this man be a door made out of wood?” Or, “How can this man claim to be a plant?” When Jesus spoke in metaphor, his audience was fully aware of it. Since they knew he wasn’t...

Lol....you are the pope of your church which has one member....YOU!;)

You partake in His body/blood spirituality???? o_O That makes ZERO SENSE!!! He SHOWED you how to partake of it at The Last Supper. Soooo why don’t you believe Him?

Thank you for quoting Justin Martyr....I agree with him...we do not receive these things (the bread and wine) as common bread and common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Saviour!!!

Why did he ask: Do you take offense at this? They were offended because they knew he was speaking about His flesh ....NOT a spiritual flesh. They were soooo offended they walked away. Sounds like you walked away also :(

Actually that would be out of context of His bread of life discourse

Jesus did not say, “My flesh is of no avail.” He said, “The flesh is of no avail.” No one should believe he meant my flesh avails nothing because he just spent a good portion of this same discourse telling us that his flesh would be “given for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51, cf. 50-58)