Search results

Agreed, you cannot enter the gate (v5) that you cannot see (v3). The language is very poetic and figurative, as John tends to be. I personally love the relationship between enlightenment, our ability to see (v3) and our actions (walking through the gate, v5).

Not sure where to put this. Some claim that if we truly have the Spirit, there will be no division among us. 1 Samual 16:13 says "from that day on" would fall upon David. Yet, later David himself committed adultery and murder. What are we to make of this.

1st of all, I don't take V8 out of context. By the time Hebrews was written, Jesus was well established in other Apostolic writing as the son of God, the Messiah, the Christ, anointed by God to be the sacrifice of the world. This is re-iterated in Hebrews 1:1-2 where God spoke to us through his...

Great vid on the crisis of meaning.

Wrong. Time is a concept with proper application. The definition of time is motion, the change in position. If things did not move, there would be no time in application and time would be "only" a concept. You presented an equation involving energy. Now, let's examine the technical definition...

No, I would not argue with God but your blatantly incorrect take on Hebrews 1:8, especially given v 5 where God called Jesus his son and referenced the day he created his son.

You are right. It is that simple. The rest of the analysis was to clear up the confusion sowed by the Adversary.

This is an attribute of agency. When you are speaking to a Messenger, the Messenger speaks with the authority of his principal in which he was sent.

IDOLATRY of doctrine.

Interesting. How did they know they were not the rightful heirs?

A leftist tactic; pretend the issue is about science not raw political power.

Then there are the coverts whose stories are suppressed. Gender Transformation: The Untold Realities

The truth is filth? Dust for speaking the truth?! Very unbecoming.

Relying on the most ever prone translation in English it’s not a very good idea.

You have that exactly backwards. Besides reading what you want into John 1:1 is there any other biblical evidence that the word of God is a man?

Sure. Arrested and bound not executed. The other verses are ambiguous but Mark 14:61-62 is explicit and direct on the point. Anyway, we believe Jesus is the messiah. The Jews do not. I think it’s important to understand the basis for the rejection and have a cogent response. Don’t you?

Got allowed man to sell a dozen hotdogs to be sold with 10 buns. He has to have a sense of humor!

Do you think sanctification is about redemption?