Search results

You're not making sense, probably because the theory you're on isn't actually written in God's Word. Jesus showed in Matthew 24 that the great tribulation will be shortened for His elect's sake. That means they go... through... it. And if His very elect go through it, that means the rest of...

Impossible. You know why? Because after Jesus gave those main Signs of the very end of this world, He then commanded those in Christ to learn the parable of the fig tree. And in that parable He said the generation that sees ALL those things (i.e., all those Signs), will not pass until He...

I had to show the Bible view, because Leftists-Socialist-Communists try to use the anger card against Christians who know how to deal with God's enemies per His Word. And it ain't about turning the other cheek. What Bible view am I talking about? Luke 22 where Jesus spoke to His disciples in...

Not a theory. Revelation with the "dragon" is pointing directly to Satan himself, and not to any other. Maybe you ought to read Revelation 13:4-8 of how it says the whole world will worship... who? the "dragon". And if anything, the "man of sin" title confirms... that it's about Satan, because...

More SDA hogwash. (I must have hit a note when I exposed where a lot of your theories originate, even though you've tried to still hide it). There are only 2 beasts mentioned in Christ's Revelation, the beast king idea, and the beast kingdom, both concepts first covered in the Book of Daniel...

I ain't got time for all that, the further you think about that Daniel 9 Scripture the further away from its simplicity you get.

I suggest to you sir... that YOU go back to re-read Acts 2, because clearly... you don't understand what The Word of God says there. By that statement I assume you now know what I think of 'your' word, which can never replace God's Word as written. In Acts 2 in the Greek, there is even an...

Nah, that kind of thinking is spiritualizing God's Word. Just because you may not yet understand matters of the Heavenly, that doesn't mean you can deny them as being literal. Peter literally... meant that Lord Jesus at His resurrection went and literally... preached The Gospel to the dead who...

The nation of Israel became a nation again in 1948 by U.N. Charter vote. The U.S. voted for it. But the U.N. set Israel's borders, and they still control it, because every time the Israelis get fed up with the radical Muslims shooting rockets at them and decide to leave their borders and take...

You tried to mock Behold by throwing the 'idle words' passage at him, just because he rebuked charismatic's false belief in a gibberish speech. He is correct on what he said, and here's more proof...

You said: "Christ did not preach the Gospel of salvation in Sheol/Hades." Well yeah, He did... preach The Gospel, like the 1 Peter 4 Scripture I quoted... 1 Peter 4:6 For, for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the...

Same goes for you too bud. Just remember, when you point your finger, there's four more pointing back at yourself.

No gymnastics, just simple reading of The Scripture. Paul was giving an analogy there with that "Though". He was speaking metaphorically about being able to speak with the tongue of angels. And furthermore, didn't those on earth whom angels appeared to understand them when they spoke? So where...

That part above is in error. The "spirits in prison" were not about demons. 1 Peter 4:5-6 5 Who shall give account to Him That is ready to judge the quick and the dead. 6 For, for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the...

Paul didn't say... he did by that, he said, "Though...", which per the Greek is a 'conditional particle'... NT:1437 ean (eh-an'); from NT:1487 and NT:302; a conditional particle; in case that, provided, etc.; often used in connection with other particles to denote indefiniteness or...

Of course the rich man of Luke 16 was not yet 'born again', he found himself in hell then, and of course Jesus was giving that story to the Jews at His 1st coming, why? Because of the Jews not understanding of what happens after death of the flesh, that one's soul continues to the heavenly...

It's obvious you're not even showing you understand the idea of language by saying that. That "groanings which cannot be uttered" of Romans 8:26 is not even about a language, since it says those 'sighs' (Greek stenagmos) cannot be 'uttered' (Greek alaletos, unspeakable). Languages are...

Yes, I'm familiar with that passage, but you cannot start doing Jewish Gematria with it, because the prophecies given Daniel are not overwritten by that Leviticus verse. You STILL have to heed the Daniel prophecies. What you are doing instead is a kind of prognostication just using numbers (with...

But of course since you are not understanding the Daniel 9 prophecy and how Jesus' Ministry ended with the end of the 69th week, then nor are you understanding the Daniel 12 timing either. In Daniel 12, Daniel asks the angel when is the end of those "wonders", then he is given the prophecy...

Of course I've read it, but not with charismatic's ideas added to it. Have you never read Acts 2 then, since it sounds like you think the gibberish tongue some speak today is the true cloven tongue?