Search results

With respect JBF but I see from your reply you do not see the inconsistency in it.

Since you are pressing me Enoch, I'd say Mr Obama's policy for medical treatment accessibility for the poorer classes. I wouldn't call that nonsense.

I see no point Enoch; the grove you are in is so deep you would not see it.....your language in post #33 confirms that.

In truth, you reveal what you love!

lol...interesting how you have made 'leftist and nonsense' synonymous and 'conservative and truth' synonymous. It highlights the loss of objectivity as well as a groove well worn by a heavy wheel.

Be careful with your evaluation jaybird lest you find yourself guilty.

A note on 'our testimony'. We can understand this as meaning our personal story or we can understand it to be our testimony (our reality) to the vindication of the character of God. When the multitudes and heavenly hosts praise God they are vindicating his character which for many ages has...

yes, he did show us a new way....he raised the bar, he didn't lower it..... 'you have heard it said, do not commit adultery but I say unto you that he who looks at a woman lustfully has committed adultery in his heart' 'keep the commandments' Jesus said... 'all these things have I done' the...

Allow it to seep in.

:) you mean, those in the tub were for the propagation of the species! :)

If you want some clarity on your headers subject matter, I would consider the issue of the need to control the narrative. ....and just in case this offends you, looking at why it does, without denial, is helpful.

Not being able to prove or for that matter disprove does not make anything right or wrong. Relying on the logic of proof or disproof is fraught with many problems, primarily mans limited objectivity and love of denial.

incidentally, re tree kangaroos and wallabies, I have them in my back yard. I don't see them that often but from time to time they show themselves.

This applies to any understanding. One can have the doctrines all correct but not have the correct doctrine, if you get my drift. Understanding/knowing is relational when it comes to getting a handle on the utterances of scripture. A solely cognitive approach leaves the participant with no oil.

Now that's an interesting one. It tells me that no amount of study, quoting of scripture or yada yada about spiritual matters is a key to arriving at anything truthful regarding God's purposes/revelation. Unless God opens the understanding (of even a donkey) all of man's collective wisdom will...

Get a grip on yourself DNB. Firstly, my response to another person is not your business and secondly your self appointed role of judge and jury is out of order!

I'll share this with you DNB. My brevity of answers is deliberate. If they are misinterpreted without further enquiry, so be it, for I have learned that without enquiry, without curiosity there is judgement and short sightedness even if a post is a page long.

Play with and maintain that justification and it will take you to places you had not imagined. Adam only ate a fruit.....even against being warned....and look at the mess that has ensued! Sin dulls the ability to discern, it's an anaesthetic, it is the bedfellow of fools....it has a snowball...

therein is the devils trick....for he knows that any conscious concession to sin ensures the bait has been taken.....the poison of which does its work.

The directive to love your neighbour as yourself is not new in scripture. Even David was a distance to that. What is new is Jesus' directive to love as I have loved you. The Pharisee in Jesus' story thanked God he was not like other men and it becomes evident that David had a different...