Search results

look up post 208 there is your evidence.

So James did not know what He was writing about, but God has revealed it to you? what authority do you claim to tell us this lofty revelation. James was an Apostle to teh Jews. He was part of the early diaspora and knew of many Jews who converted to the faith throughout the empire! It is...

Sounds like you are a Jehovahs Witness. Or at least mirror their doctrine. @ days (thousand years) were not allotted. That is a man made construct. Also Jesus return will be very very very visible to the entire world!

Well developing that faith comes from the Word of God, not belonging to a man made organization that self proclaims itself as Gods sole channel of communication on earth.

This is in error Satan is the chief cherub (or was) not a seraph.

Well as you are so narrow in your deciding who is and who isn't a "credible" historical scholar, I am just needing to know how one is determined to become a "credible" scholar. Still waiting for how one is determined and what lies about Romanism I am guilty of and how I have borne false...

Still waiting for your explanation of John 1:1 BTW You can't prove Jesus is messiah by the book of Joel. so does that not make Him Messiah. You are just playing a pre-pubescent silly game.

No my opinion was that you made up Abrahams knowledge about Jesus without fact. I know that Abraham exercised faith towards god. He just did not know the details of Jesus life, death , and resurrection.

How so when the words inspired to be written say it is a physical mark on the forehead or right hand. there is one overriding them of Scripture. And within that theme there are many messages.

I invite you to go to post #208 and click on any of the three links posted there for evidence. And I asked you about the bishops mitre! I have a point but it needs you to answer first.

what determines "hard" historical facts? do you actually believe the Catholic church would write down what they borrowed from pagan belief systems? And yet I debunked your debunk. See, I am convinced anything written that sheds a dark pall on any Catholic practice or belief- you will simply...

Well I need to know the standard created to determine who is a "qualified" historical scholar. 1. Who decided that standard 2. what criteria is necessary. 3. when was this standard established. 4. where is this standard found so all can see. 5. what do they have to be qualified in to meet the...

I listed a bunch for bread of life- go to one of my posts to him and link to them. I am sure you already know I posted those links. YOu think they are beneath you but for now that is all I am ready to give arrogant acting petulant responders.

Why Bishops wear the pointy hat of course. Would you like me to be presumptuous as you and say you are dodging answering a simple question.

I asked you- you are the one too rude to answer the question. I am not prevaricating. Stopped projecting onto me what you are doing.

Well I am waiting

then explain John 2 as I asked and why the Apostles under the inspiration of God used the word that can only mean that what died rose again. Stop giving me reasoning but5 answer the Scriptures! John 2:18-22 King James Version 18 Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou...

then you have a problem with Gods Word and not me! John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. That was the Apostle John commenting under the inspiration of the Holy...

It is disingenuous that you bounce from translation ot translation to buttress your opinion. The construct of the Greek tells us it is the number of a man singular- not a human number. You allow yourself to be swayed to and fro because you fail to study and then espouse yourself to know better...

You rignorance of Scripture is showing. God raises and deposes kings according to His will. No one anywhere rules without Gods approval according to HIs will. That is the Bible apart from human reasoning.