Search results

I'm someone who tells it like it is, so I'm telling you that you are delusional to think that Jesus has already come. You are deceived. The "glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ" is something we are still waiting for. It is "that blessed hope" What is your hope in?

This is obvious to anyone who has even a little bit of discernment, but, obviously, anyone who denies the deity of Christ has none. He can't even discern that when the days of the Son of man are compared directly to the days leading up to the day Noah entered the ark and the days leading up to...

LOL. You, someone who denies the deity of Christ, can't expect to convince anyone of anything. The context of "the days of the Son of man" are very obvious. There is no convincing needed here. It is extremely obvious to any unbiased person that Jesus compared the days of the Son of man directly...

I agree that it can't be two individuals, but how does seeing the two witnesses as "the Law and the Prophets" equate to the two witnesses being symbolically called "the two olive trees" and "the two candlesticks"?

That is talking about sinning willfully, not slipping up by unwillingly giving in to the desires of the flesh. Paul talked about unwillful sin in Romans 7:14-25 and you act as if there is no such thing. But, those verses you quoted are talking about willful, unrepentant, rebellious sin like is...

Hmm. Seems like you're here to play patty cakes and sing Kumbaya. Don't get me wrong. There's a place for that and there's nothing wrong with it. But, not here. I'm all for fellowship, but this is a forum where people mostly are disagreeing with each other and you need to be able to handle that...

This is absolutely false. The foolish virgins are not believers which is why they will say "Lord, Lord" when He returns and He will say He doesn't know them and will proceed to have them cast into the lake of fire where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Matthew 25:10 "But while they...

I couldn't care less. I will talk to others who aren't so hypersensitive on a forum that everyone knows will involve debate.

So, you interpret it figuratively and/or spiritually as well then, right? It's obviously not talking about us being there with Him literally, but spiritually. Paul relates it directly to what he talked about in verses 4 and 5 which clearly is in relation to our current spiritual salvation after...

Exactly. The one speaking lies here is the one condemning other people for merely having a different interpretation of some Bible prophecy than he does. He needs to repent of that or he is headed for a fall. We should be humbled to receive wisdom from God, not puffed up with pride while acting...

The number 666 is not the number of a man, it's the number of mankind. The beast is not a man, it's a kingdom. Prophetic beasts are kingdoms (Daniel 7:23). The number 666 reflects that mankind falls short of God's standards. It's well known that the number 7 represents completeness and...

What are you even talking about? What idea is put to rest exactly? No one denied that we will be bodily resurrected in the future. But, that is not what this passage is talking about: Ephesians 2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, 5 Even when we were dead...

I was talking about when he said this without quoting anyone: Where did he say "OP said" here? He did not indicate who he was talking to.

I didn't say goodbye. I will soon. As always, you take things out of context. I'm saying you are a fool in how you are talking about the topic at hand. You are being foolish about it. There, is that better to say it that way? Look in the mirror to see who is the prideful one here who won't...

Is it not possible in your make believe world for someone to mistakenly believe in false doctrine without it being a case of someone knowingly teaching false doctrine? Only the latter qualifies as a lie, not the former. We amils are fully convinced that our doctrine is true. We are not purposely...

Like so many other scriptures, he is taking 1 Corinthians 3:2 out of context. The verse refers to Christians. Immature Christians that Paul called "babes in Christ", but Christians nonetheless. Yet, he is trying to use that verse to say that we are not Christians just as he claims we do not have...

LOL. You are a fool. I have answered and you just respond with nonsense. Don't try to hold it against me for not wanting to waste any more time talking to someone who doesn't pay any attention to what I'm actually saying and misrepresents everything I say.

You're way out of line. You are foolishly equating having a perfect understanding of all end times doctrine, or at least a correct interpretation of Revelation 20, with salvation! Are you kidding me? You are completely delusional. You will be judged by the same measure you are judging us which...

LOL. Okay, we're done, buddy. I can't reason with someone who takes such a hyperliteral approach to interpreting scripture and can't recognize that we have spiritually had part in Christ's resurrection by way of being spiritually saved which Paul likens to going from being dead in sins to...

I think that is a well reasoned interpretation of the two witnesses and I find it to be completely viable. But, since you think I'm spiritually blind, I guess this means you need to rethink all of this because God forbid that you agree with someone like me, right? Anyway, while I do think your...