Search results

You have it backwards. Those two commands are eternal. The Ten Commandments were holy and based on them, but could never fulfill them. So if they were not as good as the eternal laws, why give them? Galatians 3:What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, until...

Of course, but we are given the power of God to never break them, and even to be more righteous than those who only keep Torah perfectly. That is what Jesus did for us.

If you are talking about imputed righteousness given to us as a covering, WHILE WE CONTINUE TO SIN UNDERNEATH, that is a myth. Jesus was manifest to take away our sin, and in Him there is no sin...Whoever is born of God does not sin, because His seed remains in Him, and he CANNOT sin, because He...

Did you read the last verse I quoted in my post? Here it is again. Romans 3: 31 Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law. Why? Because breaking the law is not in our born again divine nature. 1 John 3:9 Whoever has been born of God does...

Please read my post #135.

What He taught. To believe on the name of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior, and to have love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control, produced through His gift of the Holy Spirit of Christ, without which we do not belong to Christ. 1 John 3:23...

The laws are written on our hearts. Are you saying you don't keep the laws of Jesus because they are commandments? You completely misunderstood that trusting in Jesus is not lawlessness. The reason why we are not under the law is because He has taken away our sinful nature so we don't commit...

Did you know that the laws of Jesus are harder to keep than the Torah for the natural man? That is why he is talking about the "air-flow." That is the Holy Spirit. If you keep the laws of Jesus, then you will automatically keep the Torah perfectly.

I agree. It also means breathed or blown, and also spirit or soul.

Bye for now.

Thanks, that was sweet. He does.

LOL

No, more like Romans 14. Peter was between a rock and a hard place, and Paul was only considering the Gentiles, not the visiting Jews.

Sorry, but there is nothing H about you? LOL

There is nothing demeaning about it. You are just being snarky.

"Hogwash"? Is that from one of the fruit of the Spirit? The point is, what right did Paul have for speaking against Peter for doing the same thing Paul did himself?

"air-flow" is breath - Spirit. John 20: 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit.

1 Corinthians 9: 19 For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; 20 and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law; 21 to those who are...

We have Paul's side, but Peter did the very same thing that Paul does himself. That is unfair, and where is Peter's side to this? Where does it say that Peter "took it"?

Paul was the one who trespassed against Peter. Peter was in the right. But did he knowingly sin against Peter? No.