Search results

I wasn’t saying anything in Daniels 70 weeks is not important, I was saying the prophecy in Daniel is more important and warier to understand than the beasts or kingdoms.

You’re reading Romans 11 with dispensational glasses lol. Read chapter 10 and then read chapter 11. Paul is telling us that yes God is casting away the wicked Jews but he is not casting was HIS CHOSEN PEOPLE just because they are Jews. The Jews are not, we’re not, and never will be Gods chosen...

I believe Daniels 70 weeks, not 490 years, is much easier understand and much more important than the kingdoms. Daniels 70 weeks is a prophecy prophesying the end of the people of Israel and earthly Jerusalem and the beginning of heavenly Jerusalem under the authority of Jesus Christ and and...

It also says it would happen to THAT generation too. Seems pretty clear doesn’t it? The time of JACOBS TROUBLE in which God washed his hands of the nation of Israel forever so that it’s impossible for the time of Jacobs trouble to any time other than the cross.

With that explanation I don’t see how anyone would not understand. Great post!

Satan isn’t bound for everyone, just those that are born of God. 1Jn 5:18 We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.

The reason amil and premil are both wrong is because both sides ignore verses that dont support their side. Jesus said his kingdom is not a physical earthly kingdom but premils are looking for a physical earthly kingdom. Amils spiritualize things that shouldn’t be spiritualized.

I agree. This is one of those passages that talks about spiritual Israel (Jews and Gentiles) without using the term spiritual Israel.

Does all Israel shall be saved include the people of Israel that hate God?

My bad, I apologize for assuming. So what does all Israel mean in your view?

If all Israel isn’t saved right now then “all Israel shall be saved” is a mistake in the Bible or “all Israel” doesn’t mean what you’re putting forth.

Who would you say are the ones in verse 39 referred to as “it” are?

I agree with the other stuff that you wrote but I want to focus on the parallel between the two passages. Specifically I want to focus on the two groups in John 6 - 1) “it” and 2) “him”. Why is one called an it and the other is called him? Jhn 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath...

I definitely appreciate your friendly tone too brother. So lets delve deeper. You said "Remember when they stoned Stephen to death. The Heavens opened up to Him to receive him, and I'd bet money that there was no more pain! It is only the flesh body that dies and gets buried in the ground."...

Jhn 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. Jhn 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting...

When Jesus died on the cross the place was prepared. No? What more does Jesus have to do to allow us access into heaven?

Are you aware that dead people come up from their graves and lay on the ground for three days and then stood to their feet and walked the streets of Jerusalem when Jesus rose from the dead? Are you aware that God came down from heaven and punished the inhabitants of the earth when Jesus died on...

Yes you can call it “caught up”, “snatched away”, “harpazoed” or “raptured” all of those terms are talking about taking believers out of this world and into heaven. I do not say that this doesn’t happen in fact I know it happens. Where the contention comes in is that your side believes that the...

Do you think this future great tribulation will be worse than the tribulation that happened around the crucifixtion?

That’s another one I don’t agree with :).