Search results

Hi Trevor; I concur with your comments and don't see any conflict with mine. The New Covenant/Testament promises were made to Abraham, and to his seed Christ, and to all who place their faith in Christ, per the Galatians verses you referenced. The promises came into full force and effect upon...

The Kingdom of God was established by and in Christ at His first coming. Mark 1 14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the...

Revelation 5 11 And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands; What literal number is "thousands of thousands"?

No prob bro.

"either when a period of time that was to elapse has passed, or when a definite time is at hand: Mark 1:15"

No need to remove them. "The great emigration: Israel sees an unprecedented number leave the country" They remove themselves. :laughing:

The seventieth week of the seventy weeks. All seventy of them. Undecapitated, unorphaned, and determined. Daniel 9:24

Scripture declares "Seventy weeks are determined..." Daniel 9:24 That means that all seventy weeks, including the seventieth week, are determined. Your seventieth week is decapitated, orphaned, and undetermined. It denies and violates Scripture's declaration. It is a futurized fantasy and...

Revelation 5 11 And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands; Yes, not one more and not one less. :laughing:

Were they unrecognized and modernist? Do you think any of the recognized historical defenders of the true faith had the mind of Christ? Antiochus lV Epiphanes was not a Roman, thus was not the little horn. There are no 2300 days in Daniel 7. This seems to be naught other than modernist...

You're neither recognized nor historical. I've provided their identities, based on the scholarship of recognized historical exegetes. True. It was and is the Roman papacy. Antiochus lV Epiphanes was not a Roman. You're in the wrong chapter.

There's no 2300 Day prophecy in Daniel 7.

What recognized historical exegete(s) espouse that interpretation? How do they identify the ten horns, little horn, and three horns in Daniel 7?

Expected nonsense confirmed. :laughing:

What were the names of their ten horns/kingdoms, and which horn/kingdom was the little horn, and which three horns/kingdoms did it pluck up? :laughing:

There is no reference to "heads" after Daniel 7:6, so they obviously had no further prophetic significance. Daniel does not elaborate upon them further. There are, however, repeated references to "horns". The historical information I've provided is consistent with the descriptions of the...

The little horn came up among Roman horns, therefore unless there is credible evidence to the contrary, the little horn was also Roman. It, i.e. the papacy, continues to be Roman to this day, providing compelling evidence of its identity as the Roman little horn. Antiochus was not a Roman...

That disqualifies Antiochus lV as the little horn, because the little horn was of the 10 (Daniel 7:8). It was Roman then, and is Roman to this day. Antiochus lV was not a Roman. Daniel 7 is a unique scenario. There is no little horn subduing any horns in any of the other passages outside of...

It is referencing "another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings." I.e. the little horn which came up among the ten horns. Daniel 7:8

The fourth beast was the Roman empire. The ten horns were Roman, arising from the dissolution of the Roman empire. The little horn came up from the Roman ten horns. Thus, the little horn was Roman. The papacy was and is Roman. Antiochus lV Epiphanes was not Roman.