Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. M

    Is the claim of only one God false? - How many gods are there?

    They are authentically gods, but they are not the true creator.
  2. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    The syntax of Greek is underestimated, while English syntax is overrated.
  3. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    Three that act as one, but they aren't required to have the same existence. The English word trinity requires it.
  4. M

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Why are there 2 different versions of the abomination which causes desolation?
  5. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    The three in the trinity are not the same existence.
  6. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    Most religions were backed by the state to some degree at the time. The literacy problem was worse.
  7. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    Compared to Greek, English would be inadequate for the time and task.
  8. M

    Does the "husband of one wife" requirement mean that polygamy was common in the early church?

    He was known as a doubter, and the Sadducees taught God doesn't wake the dead.
  9. M

    Jesus is the Son of his God

    The talmud doesn't quote the entire LXX. Try to find if it is there.
  10. M

    development of the Trinitarian doctrine

    I have noticed this should be [in] unorthodox theology
  11. M

    Two Gatherings at Jesus' Coming

    No, that is precisely what the statement says, as I read it. Christ's coming to gather his people cannot take place unless the Apostasy takes place first, which involves the revelation of Antichrist leading to his ultimate destruction at the Coming of Chirst. Perhaps, the main anti-christ was...
  12. M

    Jesus is the Son of his God

    Instead of: “Come, let us go down, and there confound their language” (Genesis 11:7), which indicates multiple authorities, they wrote in the singular: Come, let me go down, and there confound their language.
  13. M

    development of the Trinitarian doctrine

    But the Cerinthus Valentinus had no such problem. There was more than one Cerinthus.
  14. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    There is absolutely no way that modern bibles are completely translated from scratch. if thou buy a basic grammar book for translators, you will find that not all the syntax is known.
  15. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    It is literal and perhaps wrong. It would work better in Anglo-Saxon. Though assuming one name with 3 possessives could be a mistake in older English.
  16. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    There are three names. If name is repeated like, the name of the father and the name of the son, and the name of the holy spirit, then the three genitives would be forced to have one name. Appositional, noun groups in Hebrew and Greek are like that.
  17. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    I am reluctant call it a trinity instead of a mild triad.
  18. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    Wrong, because even English isn't so clear cut. The names were thought to be the three natures or hypostases.
  19. M

    Jesus is the Son of his God

    Supposedly, Akiba knew who Jesus was, and rightfully it is a crock. After the second coming, and post temple, Bar Kochba was confused with Jesus. But a witness about the original LXX is not worth ignoring. Even when talking about the tower of Babel, God says, "Let me..." It is not a sin to...
  20. M

    How did the Trinity doctrine develop in the early church?

    The model that he had in His mind; which wouldn't be imageless.