Search results

What exactly is "gnostic" about the Catholic Church?

Becaus eit wa commanded by Jesus (Luke 22:19, John 6:53-58).

WRONG. First of all, "I AM" doesn't make grammatical sense as an answer to the Pharisees' question: John 8"57 So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” For YOUR scenario to make sense - He would have to have said, "Before Abraham, I WAS" Secoindly...

Ummmm, for your information, my ignorant friend - the circular shape of the host has about God's infinite existence. It has nothing to do with "sun worship". Looks like someone has been reading to many Jack Chick comic books based on Alexander Hislop's debunked schlock opus, "The Two Babylons"...

The teachings are there – YOUR refusal to believe, notwithstanding . . . John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him [Jesus], “My Lord and my GOD!” Matt. 4:7 Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your GOD to the test.’” Phil. 2:6 ...Who [Jesus], being in...

Not only are you dishonest - you have a bad memory. I already educated you about the fact that the Son is BOTH God AND Man. The fact that He is the perfect man does NOT mean that He is NOT God. Try again . . .

Jesus said: Matt. 19:26 “…with God ALL things are possible.” WHAT part of that do you have difficulty with? As Paul wrote: Rom. 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned Only a perfect...

Jesus and His Apostles never taught that the bible is our "SOLE" Authority (Sola Scriptura). Jesus and His Apostles never taught that the we are justified by "Faith ALONE" (Sola Fide). Soooo - why do YOU and every other Protestant believe these anti-Biblical lies, Einstein? Can you define...

This entire argument is based on a FALSE premise. I never claimed that “Logos” translated to “Jesus”. I know you fancy yourself as an "expert" in Biblical data and like to use phrases like "lexical definition" - but your dishonesty exposes you. It would be similar to saying “Dave married his...

I've OPENLY-challenged you on several posts to produce the teaching from the Catechism of the Catholic Church that says we are to "worship" Mary or anybody OTHER than God. So, if you can't do that - you're not only a LIAR - but you're also a failure . . . Funny how you posted THIS particular...

Ummmm, at least asking Mary and the saints in Heaven to pray FOR us isn't a doctrinal matter for Catholics. However - you Protestants have a LOT of 'splainin' to do with the following false doctrines . . . Show me where the Bible teaches that the Bible is our "SOLE Authority" (Sola Scriptura)...

Funny how you always complain about the Pope and his "Extra-Biblical" doctrines - but you never seem to be able to name one . . .

The Son’s FLECH had a beginning. The Son ALWAYS existed – prior to becoming flesh. Paul tells us that the Son was also a Rock that followed the Israelites in the desert (1 Cor. 10:4). According to YOU – the Son only came into being when He was manifested as flesh. In Genesis, when God created...

That’s a self-refuting argument. Without the Gospels – there are NO Epistles, NO Letters, No Apostles, NO Christians, No Church – NO Christ.. The Gospels are the very basis for these things.

Semantics. The very definition of “Bishop” is “Overseer” and “Ecclesiastical Supervisor”– so both Luke and Paul were talking about Bishops. And obviously YOU don’t have a case or you would have presented historical evidence as I did.

And that’s an incredibly dishonest assessment. As I pointed out – I brought actual evidence to the table whereas, YOU only brought your opinions.

As Paul explains in Romans 7 that, as long as we’re in these bodies on this earth, we don’t “escape” sin t However – those of us in Christ get to escape the consequences of sin. As John admits 1 John 1:8 It says, "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us."...

No – you’re just another arrogant poster on an obscure little discussion forum who has bought into the delusion of his own “greatness”. The only thing you’re an “expert” on is dodging Scripture and history . . . And YOU accuse ME of cherry-picking verses . . . The “Word” of John 1:1 is the...

Nonsense. I just gave you SEVERAL teachings on it from Scripture- and YOU provided nothing in the form of a Scriptural refutation. Those "scattered verses" are the sacred, inerrant Word of Almighty GOD. Nice try . . .

Because YOU claimed that the term "New Testament" was not Scriptural - I provided Scriptural evidence that Christ's Church has the Authority to call it whatever it wants to.