Search results

Yes. Sadly, according to Jesus Himself, Judas is irretrievably lost (John 17:12). So according to dispen error, Judas will be saved; but according to Jesus, he will not.

Peter was teaching the universal church on a matter of faith and morals when Paul rebuked him.

If that were true, it would mean that Judas will be "grafted back into the vine" because he will "look upon Him whom he pierced" and mourn. So you should be prepared to meet and greet Judas in heaven.

If you believe that God retains a nation of unregenerates based on their DNA rather than their faith and obedience, despite the genetic reality that Abraham's genome is possessed by every member of the human race today, then what you are deluded by is replacement biology.

Since when does a pope accept discipline? Isn't he infallible?

I described previously who the enemies are, and who the election are. Don't attempt to contort the Word into your dispensational delusion.

There is no Scripture which claims that the election is future Israel.

Absolute nonsense. 2 Corinthians 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

Colossians 3:12 Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering; 1 Thessalonians 1:4 Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God.

Never and nowhere in Scripture are enemies of the gospel identified as the elect(ion). The elect(ion) are solely and exclusively believers in Christ, His Church.

"Will be". Dispensatanism's (h/t WPM) most indispensable two words. I've presented indisputable evidence. You've presented nothing but private hallucination. Dispensatanism's trademark. And a complete waste of bytes. Time for a new Reformation.

Why are you avoiding clear plain evidence?

"...he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God." “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum...

Peter was no pope. He had to be rebuked by Paul. (Galatians 2:11-14)

The election were the beloved remnant saved by grace. (Romans 11:5) Those not of the election were enemies of the gospel.

Isaiah 9:6 ...his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. "All the same names are applied to the pope". Thanks for confirming the blasphemy.

Obviously you won't "just hold to Scripture".

"Man of sin" in the KJV dedication. The apostate papacy.

No pope has ever publicly (or even knowingly privately) renounced Bellarmine's blasphemy.

Matthew 16:18 Greek Peter is "petros" (stone), but Christ is the "petra" (rock) upon Whom the Church is built. Peter is never identified as "petra" in Scripture. Christ is never identified as "petros" in Scripture.