Search results

GREAT post - for anybody with even a modicum of intelligence. Unfortunately, our friend is comlpetely DEVOID of this . . .

More dodgimg, I see . . . Now - stop running and ANSWER the previous question: Was Jesus’s name “Jesus” or was it “Yeshua” or was it “Iεσουσ” (ee-ay-sooce')?? Your silence is an admission of your total ignorance.

Jesus NEVER called Peter "Kephs" He called him KEPHAS - and that's why Paul called him "Cephas". Now - stop running and ANSWER the previous question: Was Jesus’s name “Jesus” or was it “Yeshua” or was it “Iεσουσ” (ee-ay-sooce')??

Because “Cephas” is a Greek transliteration of the Aramaic, “Kephs”, which is what Jesus called him. How many times does this have to be explained to you before you understand, Einstein? Here is another question for you, my linguistically-bankruptt friend: Was Jesus’s name “Jesus” or was it...

One of your usual nervous non-answers, along with, "Thanks for the entertainment", which you always vonit out when you din't have an intelligent response. THANK YOU fore repeating this irrelevant idiocy. As I educated you earloier - it doens't matter if it waas originally written in Swahili or...

Once again - you RUN from the because you don't have an intelligent response. The fact that Matthew may have been WRITTWN in Greek is irrelevant, Einstein. It could gave been WRITTEN in Swahili, The fact remains that ?Jesus and the Apostles SPOKE in Aramaic. Soooo, explain why Paul calls...

Protestant Biblical and Linguistic Scholars on Matt. 16:16-19 (cont'd) . . . "These terms [binding and loosing] thus refer to a teaching function, and more specifically one of making halakhic pronouncements [i.e., relative to laws not written down in the Jewish Scriptures but based on an oral...

Protestant Biblical and Linguistic Scholars on Matt. 16:16-19 (cont'd) . . . "Furthermore, the whole passage contains semitic structures. In Aramaic the word for both Peter's name and the rock would be identical, Kepha' . . . kepha'." --James B. Shelton, letter to the authors, 21 October 1994...

Protestant Biblical and Linguistic Scholars on Matt. 16:16-19 (cont'd) . . . "Let it be observed that Jesus could not here mean himself by the rock, consistently with the image, because he is the builder. To say, 'I will build,' would be a very confused image. The suggestion of some expositors...

Your complete failure to respond to the Scriptural beating I gave you is almost overshadowed by your Biblical and linguistic ignorance. In fact - I'm NOT even sure you can claim "ignorance" here because I've explained this to you before. Time for another Linguistics Lesson, son . . ...

And there you go again making a foolish argument based in your Scriptural illiteracy. Time you take you out to the Scriptural woodshed, son . . . YOU pointed to Matt. 28:18, where Jesus said: “ALL Authority Heaven and on earth y has been given to me.” Then, you stupidly added: ”And to NO ONE...

Since you obviously have NEVER acually read the Bible - I'll ediucate you again . . . ALL are God's chilkdren. Some are failful and som go astray. Have youu NEVER read the Parable of the Prodigal Son?? Are you completely ignorant of John 3:16 and 1 Tim. 2:4?? Enough with the...

Pagan Rome was eviul. If nothine else, however - the Romans kept meticulous records - as did the Church. I OPENLY CHALLENGE you - in front of EVERYBODY here to produce the document that promuldate the creation of the Church by Constantine. Try NOT tpo get hit qith a bolt of lightning when you...

More of your idiocy . . . Francis has NEVER taught that same sex unions were a good thing. As a matter of fact, on March 15t, 2021, h the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith released a dubium which is a response to a question. The document was also signed off by Pope Francis said that...

It’s only a “false” claim for those who don’t know their Bible very well. FIRST of all – your asinine claim that the Catholic Church is like the Mormons and JWs because they ALSO claim to be the Authoritative Church fails because BOTH of those cults are 100% Man-Made – just as EVERY single...

Guess AGAIN, Einstein. Th Greek “εφημέριος του Χριστού” translates as: "Vicar of Christ”. It DOERSN’T translate as “Anti-Christ” the The Greek word for "Anti-Chist (an-tee'-khris-tos)" is “αντιχηριστοσ” - so check the LIES at door and try to keep it honestm for a change . . . Thank you for...

"Quointessence'? "Epitome?" "Craven Cowarduce'? I hopr you didn't hurt yourself thumbing through the dictonary . . . Unfortunately, your first sentence above illustrates yoir grammatic ineptitude - because "Context" isn't a verb, Einstein. As to your false accusatins of "abomination", simply...

Because it's an idiotic question based ib a FALSE premise. I've already explained to you in FOUR posts, that this quote was taken OUT of context. At this point - I just have to assume that you don't have a CLUE as to what "Context" means . . . I already HAVE - to anyone reading this who has...

NO, it was always a natter of CONTEXT - which you rejected. You cherry-picked a statement that was completely OUT of CONTXT. Your position is as stupid as if I were to hold YOU accountable for saying, “The ENTIRE town came to see the parade.” Matt. 2:3 explicitly says that when he heard about...

And YOU are a flat-out LIAR. ` I DID explain what Bellarmine was saying in post #970: "The quote AND THE CONTEXT in which it appears can be found in chapter 17, entitled Summum Pontificem absolute esse supra Concilium: Bellarmine was positing that 1 - it follows that the Pope is over the...