Search results

I'll let Chris explain the difference between 457 BC and 444 BC.

The dates are found on page 52 of "The Atonement Clock" online. It dates "the going forth of the command to restore and build Jerusalem" at 457 BC, and the beginning of Jesus public ministry at AD 27. Chris does not express any uncertainty about the AD 27 date. Where does he say he is not...

The writer of Hebrews declares "has been manifested" in the past tense. You claim "has not occurred". One of these two is wrong.

Completely fulfilled at Calvary. Confirmation of the Covenant by Christ in Daniel 9:27 unanimously affirmed by the historic orthodox Christian Church for seventeen centuries. The grammatical referent of "he" in Daniel 9:27 is "prince" in Daniel 9:26 whose grammatical referent in turn is...

I have no position. You are the only one with a position. You don't seem to understand that you are the only one with the answers. But they are all your own opinion. And "you have no support for it". Those are your words, so they must be true.

Don't wait for my answers. I have no answers. You have all of the answers. That's what you've been telling me. But everything in your post is your own opinion. So "you have no support for it". Those are your words, so they must be true.

Jesus was cut off on (not after) the 15th of Nisan AD 30, which was exactly in the midst of, i.e. 3 1/2 years into, the 70th week. The 70th week fell contiguously after the 69th week. All consistent with Daniel's prophecy.

"you have no support for it". Those are your words, so they must be true.

You mean you're not going to give us any more of your answers? You're the only one with the right answers. We need your answers so we know what to believe. My oh my. Whatever are we going to do?

Don't ask me any questions. I don't have any answers. You have all of the answers. And "you have no support for it". Those are your words, so they must be true.

"you have no support for it". Those are your words, so they must be true.

When is "then"?

Nothing but questions. You've been claiming to have all the answers. So let's see 'em.

Happy hallucinating.

So similarly, nothing that you claim is what you claim, and you have no support for it. Thus we're at an impasse, and this conversation is concluded.

I have support from the historical orthodox Christian Church. Wanna see it?

Reality is no dress.

Post the Scriptures for your claims, otherwise there are no bases for discussion. Let's start earlier. You deny that Christ completely fulfilled Daniel 9:24 at Calvary. You believe that Christ in Daniel 9:27 is Antichrist. You deny that Christ confirmed His Covenant, prophesied in Daniel...

The actual disgrace is in your incessant attempts to impose your dispensational futurist fantasies and fallacies upon the clear plain Word of God. Hallucinatory psychosis is a serious condition.

What you consider, and what is reality, are completely divorced from one another. You are steeped in dispensational futurism (df), a modernist dogma characterized by denial of Scriptural tenets held by the historical orthodox Christian Church for 17 centuries. Church history is anathema to df...