Search results

I and others have presented multiple Scriptures that refute your rejection of Christ's kingship, His rule, His power and His glory. Your fight is with the Book. You explain away the rest of Scripture with your faulty opinion of Rev 20. 1 Corinthians 15:22-28 forbids Premil. Matthew 28:18...

Jesus is sat at the right hand Mark 16:19 records, “So then after the Lord had spoken unto them (His disciples), he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.” Colossians 3:1 says: "If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on...

You are incapable of engaging in a Christian manner. All you have is insults and avoidance. You are full of noise.

You are confusing the wrath of God at the end against the wicked with the ongoing wrath of Satan against the Church.

LOL. I knew you had nothing. I was just exposing what we all know: you are all noise and accusations.

Stop avoiding! I challenge you to a debate on the millennium. It is time to put your money where your mouth is.

That all you have - insults. You cannot even engage in a honest respectful Christian manner. Stick to the truth and Premil will go up in a puff of smoke. I challenge you to a debate on any subject. Let's see who has biblical corroboration.

You have been unable to address one Amillennialist argument. That's because you cannot refute the truth.

This is all Premil noise. It is duplicity. The greatest spiritualizers are Premils. They explain away numerous clear and literal passages in Scripture to fit their error. I am willing to address these. Premils built their doctrine on a twisting of Rev 20 and a misrepresentation of the OT...

Talk about avoiding the issues!!!! You have to do this to sustain your teaching.

How can they be the same? How can you possibly equate the millennial earth to the new heavens and new earth? They are polar opposites. This is absolutely ridiculous. You have to argue this because Premil contradicts Scripture at every turn. One Premil argument takes out another. All you do every...

You do not get it do you? You're so blinded by your own false doctrine that you cannot see that we are actually promoting what the Bible literally says, not fighting with it like you do.

This is why few take you serious.

They interpret the rest of the Scripture in the light of their faulty hyper-literalist opinion of Revelation 20, even if that means spiritualizing away many literal other scriptural passages.

You are avoiding the question. You are promoting hyper-spiritualizing. This is another proof of the duplicity of Premil. They accuse Amils of doing this, but they are the main perpetrators. That is because Premil has zero corroboration.

Talk about spiritualism gone crazy! This is all your you have. The Bible does not say what you say. You twist the text to support your error. Hosea 6:1-3: “Come, and let us return unto the LORD: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up. After two days will...

This is all noise. You need to start addressing the Amil arguments that forbid your position. It seems like you are bereft of any rebuttals.

More false claims and more avoidance.

This is simply frustration talking. He's never been able to refute Amillennialism in any debate so far. This is all he has – noice!

The second death When it comes to the meaning of “the second death” most evangelicals are in solid agreement that this is talking about eternal damnation. Revelation 20:14 tells us: “death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.” References to the term “the second...