Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Again, nothing but slurs and slights in your posts. Nothing of biblical weigh in what your present.
  2. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Are you SDA?
  3. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Revelation 20 shows Christ gain an incredible victory over every enemy of righteousness: Christ had to defeat sin – the source of man’s enslavement. He had to defeat Satan the instrument used to tempt man to sin. He had to defeat death (or the grave) the penalty of sin. He had to defeat Hades...
  4. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    More avoidance!
  5. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    The reason why Premillennialist are full of such ad hominem on these boards is because they have nothing to corroborate their opinions of Revelation 20. All they have is avoidance, insults and name-calling.
  6. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Not true! Revelation 20 is showing the potent after-effects of Christ's resurrection from the grave. We see the blessing, impact and change this had upon the redeemed and the defeat it wrought upon Satan. This is a narrative of victory, power and authority. Christ is depicted as a conquering...
  7. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    You may deny strong repeated truth that Jesus has already rose from the dead, but it makes no dent on the fact it is truth.
  8. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Premils!
  9. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Are they resurrected?
  10. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Revelation 20:6 simply says, “Blessed and holy is he ‘that hath part’ (present active particle) in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power.” The Greek word for "first" (as in first resurrection) is protos. It is a contracted superlative meaning foremost (in time, place...
  11. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    This is talking about it victory over the grave. What about the live in Christ? They are not resurrected when Jesus comes? According to your beliefs, the only victory over the second death is a future physical resurrection of the elect.
  12. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    This is all your extra-biblical invented reasoning. The Bible nowhere teaches your 7000 years theory. Premils keep shifting the fulfilment of the 6000 years to support their error. You are no different. You make it up as you go. Nowhere in Scripture does it teach Hosea 6:1-3: “Come, and let us...
  13. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Do you have any biblical corroboration to support your interpretation of Revelation 20 that physical resurrection is the event that gives us a victory over eternal punishment? Or, put different, where does the New Testament teach that the physical resurrection is the actual means of delivering...
  14. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    This is talking about all those who are not in Christ. They will be resurrected to judgment when Jesus comes after Satan's little season.
  15. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Who is "the first resurrection" in Acts 26:23? Who is "the firstborn from the dead" in Colossians 1:18? Who is "the firstfruits of them that slept" in 1 Corinthians 15:20? Who is "first begotten of the dead" in Revelation 1:5? Premils insist that the first resurrection is the physical...
  16. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    Heresy!
  17. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    More projection. Then why would you not answer a simple question? The reader can see that if they look back.
  18. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    And Amil rejects that heresy.
  19. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    He has no answer. All he has is avoidance and projection. He will not even admit that Christ is risen from the dead yet wants to call us who believe that heretics.
  20. W

    But shun profane and vain babblings

    You deny Christ's first resurrection and then you accuse others who believe in that (and believe in the future physical resurrection of mankind when Jesus comes) of being heretics. That is messed up! The issue is, you have no answer to Amillennialism. That's why you hurl all your false charges.
Top Bottom