Search results

Precisely the type of typical, nervous response I expected from you. "LOL's" and emojis - with ZERO substance. As for your deflective stat3ement in RED - THIS is what you said back in post #721: "it is what is "IN" the Ark, the Womb...that IS the Highlight and WAY to Salvation." I couldn't...

Your point us MOOT. Moses was an OT Type of Jesus. One was a mere man – the other nan who is also GOD. The Ark was made by the hands of man and was purified and blessed. Mary was made by God and was purified and blessed. As I reminded you before – ALL NT fulfillments are MORE glorious and...

You constant dodging aside - I'll make this easier for you. I'll only ask you to address a few of the unmistakable Type/Fulfillment verses. Then, MAYBE you can try to offer a Scriptural refutation for them. I'm guessing that you can't, and will simply offer up another flurry of your desperate...

THANK YOU for admitting - in your own nervous "LOL" manner - that you don't have a Scriptural leg to stand on. I have repeatedly asked you for a Scriptural rebuttal to my rock-solid Scriptural argument in post #701 - and you have repeatedly failed. Remember - a thousand denials - or desperate...

Correction: I made SEVERAL claims, and backed them ALL up with the OT Type as well as the corresponding NT Fulfillment. I not only provided the verses - I QUOTED them. All YOU'VE responded with are your usual nervous little "LOL's" . . .

Hey - if you are unable to Scripturally address the rock-solid argument I made in post #701 - just admit it and move on. No need to get huffy. Get educated instead . . .

I laid out the Scriptural argument for Mary being the fulfillment of the Ark of the Covenant in post #701. And all of your nervous "LOL's" tell me that you simply cannot refute it. But that's par-for-the-course for a person whose main refuge is always "LOL" when stumped for an answer . . .

No - this is what Scripture flatly states, using OT Type and NT fulfillment. It pretty much states it explicitly in Rev. 11:19-12:1-5. As I told you before - I presented a solid Scriptural case for Mary being the fulfillment of the Ark. ANYBODY can spout off denials - but proving your case is...

It absolutely does. Scripture teaches us in TWO different ways: Explicitly and implicitly - and BOTH are equally binding on the believer. I made a Scriptural case for Mary being the fulfillment of the Ark. Prove me wrong using a Scriptural case.

Correct. Prating FO somneone is to petition/intercede on their behalf. Praying TO someone is to ASK them something - lie YOU did below: To "Pray" sijmply means to ASK. This is the primary definition. The secondary definition includes "worship". This is offered to God alone...

She absolutely did - and He saved her at conception. It had NOTGING to do with her parents and EVERYTHING to do with her Savior. If Scripture teaches us anything - it's that NT fulfillments are ALWAYS more glorious and perfect than their OT types. This goes without exception -and the Ark of...

When some asks a question about Catholic teaching - I address them accordingly - as a person who is inquisitive. When a person disagrees with Catholic teaching - I explain the Catholic position, and they are completely free to disagree. However - I tears liars and instigators like liars and...

Hmmmmm, another LIE - what a surprise . . . The Head of the Church of England is the King or Queen. Henry VIII and Elizabeth I were BOTH heads of that church which murdered or starved some 72,000 Catholics. Do your homework . . .

Nice try - but your dishonesty precedes you. The Exorcist was referring to the devil working with those who armed Ali Agca in 1981, who then shot John Paul II. He was also referring to the attack on Christmas Eve night when the crazy woman pushed down Benedict XVI. Then he went on to discuss...

Not "angry" at all - just pointing out YOUR abject ignorance of history. Making idiotic claims about history - doesn't make them true. I could just as easily invent a litany of moronic lies against Protestantism - but I'm not dishonest. As for how many priests and Bishops that lived between...

EASY. The Catholic church hasn't committed any "atrocities" over the last 2000 years. Some evil men WITHIN the Church certainly did - but not the Church. Were there bad Popes or Bishops? Absolutely. However, if we hold the ENTIRE Catholic Church guilty because of the actions of SOME of its...

As I've pointed out so many times before - I'm only "rude" and "arrogant" when I catch you guys lying about the Catholic Church. Liars LOVE to lie - but they HATE being exposed - just like their father (John 8:44) . . .

Of course you won't - because you got caught. Just know that I will always be here to expose you when you lie.

More correctly - you can't speak to us HONESTLY without resorting to your historically and Scripturally bankrupt anti-Catholic manure. It's the mere fact that we don't let you get away with it that angers you - so try being honest, for a change . . .

You won't because you CAN'T. Let's face it - you have LIED about the very idea that I lied on ANY post. The fact that you cannot find ONE example, and instead have made a litany of excuses is glaring evidence of this. This whole thing started because I DESTROED your idiotic anti-Catholic...