Search results

Newt Gingrich observed how close Trump came to getting killed. Trump was facing a woman talking. The bullet on mark. Then he turned to look at the teleprompter. Gingrich said it was Providential.

Implies complicity.

Prophecy fulfilled. Is Secret Service: A. Incompetent? B. Complicit? All buildings within 300 yards should have been secured hours before the President showed up. NewsMax reported the building was only 50 yards away and the Secret Service head is a DEI hire.

IF, again. Nothing. I haven't read every post but we have word played with son, dog and grandchild. My uncle used to call your word play 'mental masturbation.' You are simply in denial that people could have a different God and different Jesus in their doctrine.

Precision.

You are playing word games AS you deny playing word games. In epistemology, what you are doing is referred to as precision. But even here, you are mocking precise word meanings. When asked if you have a son, that encompasses ALL senses of the word. It is NOT yes and non as revealed by the next...

That's a great point AJ! @Pancho Frijoles takes the position that people are united even though they disagree. He continues to take theory as primary over reality. In theory, it'd be great if people were united. It's an ideal. But it is not reality. Hell, even people who agree in theory cannot...

I think there is some confusion in this thread about how Pastors dress as they stand on the alter of God with the people in the audience. And I think you know the answer to your question.

IF If things were different they wouldn’t be the same. As it is, things are different, so they are not the same.

Your heart and conscience, which God discerns. Generally, it says to all glory to God. Do you suppose tithing the least brings glory to God, such as your worst sheep, full of defects and blemishes?

Essential difference?

You are invoking the fallacy of Strawman in logic. No one is denying that words have different senses. However, antonyms are not synonyms. In this context, the question is about existence. Does a son of God exist? The question is general, encapsulating ANY sense of the word. Christian’s say...

Yes. I already indicated several ways you do this. Regarding word games of son, you added qualifiers that were not part of the question, which was unqualified. “Do you have a son?” is a general question. Inserting qualifiers “legal” or “biological” was done for the game of falsely answering...

Yea, I'm seeing that also. Our friend likes to play god by playing word games; if we define words the way we want, then anything can mean anything. Another example is to claim there are no essential differences. You put out many essential differences. He retorts, although those are differences...

That reminds me of a comedian who played the news anchor in SNL. He said his god thinks he's hilarious, which is why he picked him as his god. :jest:

Again, the choice to dress down is a reflection of your heart.

Gaslighting. As you are playing games ... you deny it ... then play more games.

My axiom is that when it comes to politics, everyone is biased. The only question is what is the bias? Fact is, there are almost always arguments FOR and AGAINST a proposition. An intelligent mind can entertain an idea that he does not share. Many refuse to acknowledge any validity to ideas...

No one ever said the outside of the cup is all that matters. Doubtful that Jesus had a "Sunday best" outfit. And that's the point. Choice. What does it say when you choose to dress down at a serious event?

Seems many Christians in this thread reject the OP premise, meaning we are not actually worshipping the same God or believe in the same Jesus. Sadly Pancho, you are just regurgitating your own belief system, which has embraced THE PERVERSION OF EQUALITY. So much of what you write sounds good in...