Search results

Everything you accuse Amils of is exactly how you function. Stop turning it around to justify your ill-advised campaign.

Yes it does. Stop trying to be difficult.

Those who have eyes to see will see it. This is the revelation that totally bamboozled the carnal Pharisees with their fixation on an earthly fleshy temporal kingdom. Many make the same mistake today and miss the same truth of God.

There is one literal first resurrection where Christ defeated the grave. The Bible makes it clear that Christ is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the firstfruits of them that slept" (1 Corinthians 15:20), "first begotten...

He is both the root and the offspring. This is talking about His Godhood and His manhood. He was before David as Lord and He was after him as his posterity. On the same vein, Christ asked the Pharisees, in Matthew 22:42-46, “What think ye of Christ (or Messiah)? whose son is he? They say unto...

Once again, the opposite is the truth. Jesus was not just “the offspring of David,” he was also “the root” of David (Revelation 22:12-16). The good olive tree is a holy tree that represents a holy people. Gentiles have been spiritually joined to faithful Israel, “and with them partakest of the...

Can you answer the rest of his questions?

I have never seen a poster be so unconformable with their own views. It is obviously time to abandon them.

What he actually means is: by preaching that Jesus and His atoning sacrifice at Calvary is the only way to heaven. That is what he's talking about bro. That is his definition of anti-Semitic.

That is who he is. He likes to offend.

No, you have not, and you know it.

I do care and that is exactly why i am exhorting you to stop avoiding post after post that exposes your narrative. How about addressing all the many avoided posts on these threads? You cannot even be transparent about what you believe. You are always trying to conceal your position and your...

I agree.

You have a major problem with directly addressing the rebuttals that are addressed toward your claims. Contrary to work you seem to think, that doesn't enhance your arguments, it exposes them. You don't seem to grasp that. There are so many rebuttals that you have ignored obviously because you...

You are digging a deeper hole for yourself. You are totally contradicting yourself. If that was the case then then it would be the case with the total and climactic destruction that accompanies Jesus return.

Please address my rebuttal. Stop avoiding. It does not enhance your cause.

Justin Martyr One of the leading early Chiliast proponents of this was Justin Martyr. He believed that Satan would be destroyed at our Lord’s return: [T]he serpent that sinned from the beginning, and the angels like him, may be destroyed, and that death may be contemned, and for ever quit, at...

Nowhere does Irenaeus mention the binding of Satan at the second coming. In fact, not one early writer that I can find (up until AD240) taught a further binding of Satan at the second coming. You are trying to foist that upon them without the slightest evidence (or justification) to do so. If it...

I have presented questions like these contained in the Op for around 14 years on different forms, testing my thesis. No Premillennialist has yet been able to come up with hard evidence to prove their thesis. You are the same. I deliberately measured my questions in regard to AD 240 and AD 270 to...

Still not fixed. Check Post 29.