Search results

But a direct contradiction is what the doctrine of men Richard is on has created. It's the idea that Christ's grace was NOT preached to the Jews, but by Paul only to the Gentiles, AND, that there is one Gospel for Israel, and a whole other Gospel just for Gentiles. In reality, Christ and His...

No, I think it's time someone else try to get you to see how simple that Dan.9 Scripture really is, ESPECIALLY since Christ has already come once to fulfill the 62 weeks period, leaving only one symbolic "week" yet to be fulfilled today.

And that "unusual sense" he speaks of is the 70 weeks prophecy employing sets of seven day periods, instead of a day for a year given in Ezekiel 4.

The northern border of ancient Israel was at the river Euphrates. Babylon lay north of that river Euphrates. Gen 15:18-21 18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19...

Let's see what Kiel & Delitzsch say about Whom the Dan.9:25 verse is speaking... Dan 9:25 The O.T. knows only One who shall be both priest and king in one person (Ps 110:4; Zech 6:13), Christ, the Messias (John 4:25), whom, with Hävernick, Hengstenberg, Hofmann, Auberlen, Delitzsch, and...

Context of the Scripture is what determines whether that word for 'anointed' means one of God's elect like a prophet, priest, or king, or to king Cyrus in Isaiah 45, or applies to Christ Himself. In the majority OT usage of the word, it points to king David. So a true Bible scribe would easily...

You're blindness is amazing!! 454 B.C. - command to restore; 405 B.C. - Jerusalem and temple restored = 7 sevens (49 years) 405 B.C. - restoration to time of Christ in 29 A.D. = 62 sevens (434 years)...

No it doesn't, for both are the same Hebrew word for 'Messiah'. The 62 weeks (434 years) from the time the 2nd temple and Jerusalem was finished to the time of Christ's crucifixion in 29 A.D. was fact. The Scripture is not that difficult... Dan 9:25-26 25 Know therefore and understand, that...

John Wolvoord was a Pre-tribulationalist and a Dispensationalist. I'm not either one, so you've assumed wrong. As others have also noted on this forum, Pre-tribulationalists consistently create backward and blasphemous heresies against God's Holy Writ just in order to keep their Pre-trib lie...

Christ resurrected 3 days and 3 nights after His crucifixion. He then appeared to His disciples for 40 days afterwards in His resurrection body, and then ascended to Heaven per the end of Mark 16; Luke 24; Acts 1:9>.

I think he got mixed up among a group of New Agers somehow. California does have a whole lot of the pagan eastern religious centers.

Then let's look at what Amillenialism defines as its doctrine... This per the Amillennialist Michael J. Vlach, Ph.D: It should be noted that the term Amillennialism is a reactionary title in that it denies the presence of a future literal 1000-year reign of Christ on earth that...

There's a dating error in the Irish Annals Of The Four Masters that can easily be found by going back from the time of Christ's birth as recorded in the Annals, to the time of the flood as also recorded in the Annals. The dating is around 500 years off, and when it is corrected, the Annals align...

Now that's using common sense, for a lot of military Chaplains and political Churches that support "one world government" are on that view. It's best to stay in God's Word with our Lord's help, and let the chips fall where they may, especially in today's times.

Who supported radical Islamic terrorists back during the Cold War? Ans: Communist nations, like Russia and Red China. Why would Communists, whose beliefs are allied with atheism, support any religion period? Islam is a tool, nothing more.

Oh I believe Apostle Paul very much, and my Lord Jesus too, thank you. It's YOU whom I do not believe. Heb 13:2 2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares. (KJV) Matt 22:30 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in...

Yet many amillennialists treat Christ's second coming as 'not real', not literal, and that regardless of whether they use the word 'spiritual', 'symbolic', or... 'figurative''; they still don't believe in a bodily return of Christ Jesus back to this earth as written in God's Word (Zechariah 14...

Well, what kind of works does the second beast, i.e., the "another beast" of Rev.13:11 forward do? That Scripture shows you if you'll simply bother to read it using simple common sense. Not only that, but Christ and His Apostle Paul also gave other Scripture parallels to the second beast...

Try reading Biblescribe's last statements in that post. It almost sounds like a Jimmy Durante routine like 'go' or 'stay'. The 70 weeks prophecy given in Dan.9 is not that difficult. Certainly not as uninterpretable as Biblescribe has tried to make it. Using "figurative" instead of...

Isa 25:6-9 6 And in this mountain shall the LORD of hosts make unto all people a feast of fat things, a feast of wines on the lees, of fat things full of marrow, of wines on the lees well refined. 7 And He will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail...