Search results

Why are you doing this?? I've shown you several times now. This is from post #803: Matt. 27:56 says, "among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee". Mark 15:40 states, "There were also women looking on from afar, among whom...

That's because you're completely dishonest. John 19:25, which I have posted about a dozen times says: "But STANDING NEAR THE CROSS OF JESUS were his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene". Man - dishonesty is like a disease with you people . . .

Why do you continue to lie? I explained to YOU in post #803 - and to bbyrd in post #824.

No - you started out by being nice - then you spouted ridiculous lies against the Church like all of these other ignorant anti-Catholics. If you want to have a nice conversation - then knock it off with the anti-Catholic manure. I don't care of you "respect" me. ALL I care about is that the...

Didn't see it?? I'll show you again . . . As YOU and everybody here has already been shown - these are the children of the "other" Mary standing near the cross. By the way - the cross is what Jesus was nailed to and died on, in case you didn't know. Matt. 27:56 says, "among whom were Mary...

You MAY have been one - but you were a very ignorant one. Most of what you say about what the Church teaches is dead-wrong. It's frightening to think that you taught the Catechism.

Then SHOW me where the Bible speaks of MARY'S other children. Can you do that?? I'll even take an apocryphal writing or ANY historical document. Can you show me one - just ONE?? That's what I thought . . .

Then PLEASE show me where I was debunked on this thread. Just ONE post.

That's really frightening - that YOU taught about the mass and don't know what is happening during the Mass. You said that the priest puts the "pieces" into the cup - then they go out to the parishioners. This is total nonsense. The Cup is where the Precious Blood is held. The Ciborium is...

Then debunk what I presented. That's the way an intelligent conversation works . . .

Like I said, son - you're OUT of ammuntion so you're taking cheap shots. Try to respond with something of substance - and not just asinine one-liners. I've exposed another one . . .

Unless you've been completely ignoring my posts - I already debunked this idea - several times. This is what I presented: Why do you cling to verses like this one that only work to prove the Catholic position?? As YOU and everybody here has already been shown - these are the children of the...

Actually - I'm sensing just the opposite with you - a complete cerebral breakdown. If there is no mention of the Bishops of the Churches in Rev 1 & 2 - then there is no need for mention of the Pope. He wasn't to blame for their shortcomings. It was the parishes themselves. Anyway - you lied...

Apparently, you're run out of ammunition and useful information on this topic. Next time - bring something bigger than a pea-shooter to a gunfight . . .

Wrong. If you're talking about the consecrated host - it ONLY get's broken up into smaller pieces if it's an extra large host. If it's a smaller host, the priest consumes it all. Nobody around the altar gets "first picks". As for the Cup that goes to the parishioners - that holds the...

It's not a historical document. I can write a book showing that she gave birth to space aliens - but that doesn't prove squat.

No - we've shown with Scripture and extra-biblical historical documents that Mary never had another child besides Jesus. The ball is in YOUR court, sparky. Show me ONE shred of evidence that she did and you'll win the debate . . .

It's a historical document. I'll tell you what - show me a historical document that says Mary had "other" children and I'll take you seriously.

That's just it - YOU guys are the ones telling us to prove this negative. All we are saying is that there is NO evidence - Scriptural OR historical that shows Mary having ANY other children besides Jesus.

It's quite possible that Jesus had step-siblings. The one thing we know for sure is that they weren't Mary's children.