Search results

Ribera was a futurist. So is Davy. He's the antithesis of an historicist.

I'm a Reformation historicist. If you know any of them who were Communists, let us know. :D

Why do you do the futurist seminary category? Ribera was a futurist. He fabricated a futurized antichrist in an attempt to deflect the Reformation declaration of the apostate papacy as the prevailing antichrist of that era. You subscribe to Ribera's futurized antichrist. You're a futurist.

All Jesuits, including the Communist ones, believe Francisco Ribera. You believe Francisco Ribera, thus sharing that belief with all Jesuits, including the Communist ones.

So you believe the Communist Jesuit Francisco Ribera.

Thankfully the Reformers were not deceived by Francisco Ribera. Thank God for the Reformation.

The pope is more than pleased with Francisco Ribera's success in deceiving you. :D Thank God for the Reformation.

Afraid, as I suspected. Thanks for the confirmation.

You seem afraid to answer the question. Are these the claims of an antichrist? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum...

So you'd rather believe the fabrications of counter-Reformation Jesuit Francisco Ribera, than your forebears who sacrificed their lives for your spiritual freedom. That's betrayal. Are these the claims of an antichrist? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of...

Ever hear of Francisco Ribera? He's done a superb job of duping and deceiving you. :laughing: Turning you into a papist perpetuating futurist fallacies and fantasies. Incapable of understanding what the man of sin has claimed about himself. What you think he will do, he has long ago done...

Francisco Ribera snags another one. :laughing: Obviously you neglected to learn to read. “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De...

There's the witness of Scripture in 2 Thessalonians 2, Daniel 7, et al; and the witness of the man of sin himself, which you refuse to believe. There's nothing whatever to "assume" about this.

You need your head screwed back on, straight this time. :D William Tyndale was a Reformer responsible for a number of English translations of Scripture. They are recognized to this day. He was martyred. But he was a premil. So none of his contributions are of any merit. Right?

I responded with my ridiculous comment to your ridiculous comment. That's how ridiculous comments work. :D

I'll take the faith, vision, and sacrifice of the Reformers over your rejections and denials. Every time.

If the plethora of evidence identifying the man of sin is still insufficient for you, there's no value for me in attempting to identify the "little season".

So because it's not in 2 Thessalonians 2, therefore the Reformers never actually burned? :D

FYI bro, the Reformers didn't burn at the stake protesting "a general reference to sinful mankind". :D They burned protesting the deception, apostasy and lawlessness of the man of sin exalting himself, sitting physically in Rome but spiritually in the Church. Showing himself to be God.

“All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...