Search results

That and far more ended up in the Pharisees' laps. Matthew 23 31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. 32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. 33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of...

Been around since the Pharisees, those "pureblooded" Jews whom you adore. Afraid to answer post 2509 to confirm it?

Whom to believe? 1. You 2. A tiny sampling of acclaimed brethren of immeasurably greater wisdom and discernment than yours Look and learn. :laughing:

Your response to post 2509 will identify the racist. Why the delay?

It's more than obvious that I apply those Scriptures to Lucifer/devil/Satan/dragon/beast (your terminology). If you think that they apply to you, I won't try to stop you from thinking that. :laughing:

The Church is permeated with deluded closet Jesuits intent on resurrecting and perpetuating the Dark Ages from which the Reformation brought deliverance, by God's grace and mercy. Their refusal to understand history condemns them to repeat its lessons.

Who in the entirety of Scripture ever produced a timeline chart?

Favor us with the verbatim quote of what "it says". :laughing: And don't defile it by trying to contort Paul into a racist. He can't be contorted.

What/whom to believe? 1. Davy's dogmas. 2. The Reformers whom God called, and endowed with prophetic wisdom and discernment, to liberate His True Church from spiritual darkness and oppression. Who needs a hint? :laughing:

1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. When did or will Lucifer/devil/Satan/dragon/beast ever deny that Jesus is the Christ, thereby denying both Father and Son? 2 John 1:7 For many deceivers are entered...

Try as you might, God cannot be contorted into a racist. You might as well stop trying.

Keraz, I believe that Revelation 2:9 is echoing what Paul said in Romans 2:28-29, wherein he declares that those who say they are Jews, but are only circumcised in the flesh; are not Jews at all unless they are also circumcised in the heart. The former are the synagogue of Satan.

They are claims identifying an antichrist. Of which there were already many when John wrote. 1 John 2:18 And none of them was, or will be, Lucifer.

You've been repeatedly shown from Scripture that the nation of Israel was comprised of both Jews and Gentiles from its beginning and throughout its history. Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22. So it's obvious that you've replaced Scripture with your own fallacies...

There is no future single antichrist in 1 John 2:18. John identifies a single antichrist as hearsay ("ye have heard that antichrist shall come"), and instead describes the reality that there were already many antichrists ("even now are there many antichrists").. The many antichrists "went out...

Your abominable dogma contorting Christ into antichrist is the epitome of blasphemy.

Thanks for confirming that denial is your only remaining argument.

A simple grammatical referent shows that the prince of Daniel 9:26 is Messiah the Prince of Daniel 9:25, as Messiah is the only individual identified as a prince in the passage. So you're claiming that Messiah the Prince will become the antichrist, i.e. Christ becomes antichrist. That's not...

Calvin peer-reviewed Clement. Did you miss it? Both of them declare that you're wrong.

That's what peer review is for. And it says you're wrong.