Search results

The Dead Sea Scrolls are plenty of evidence, the majority of them were written in Hebrew, also plenty of them were also written in Aramaic, only a few texts were written in Greek. The Bar Kokhba letters, the inscription on the cross of Jesus and the account in Acts 22:2 are more evidence that...

Jesus already had said in the prior verse 28:17 that he had all authority, why would we then need to use the Authority of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit? If Jesus has all authority, then what further need there be of him saying use another authority? that is pure nonsense. All...

The Shem-Tob’s the Gospel of Matthew (1385) preserved in Hebrew; this is definitive proof that not all texts contained the Trinitarian jargon. This Gospel has readings in agreement with: The Coptic Gospel of Thomas (1st or 2nd century; MS dates to the 4th century) The Old Syriac version (2nd...

The Gospel of Matthew is full of Hebrew/Aramaic alliterations, puns and word connections. That is a strong indication that it was originally written in that language. Theodor Zahn a German biblical scholar of such reputation that even the great Harnack feared him, argued for the existence of...

Yes I am a professional translator I have an L= linguistic designation from the military and I have translated many documents for the military and the civilian sector. Yes I can clearly tell when a document is a translation. you obviously have not studied the textual debates about Matthew to...

The Gospel of Matthew itself is the biggest evidence that it originally was a Hebrew Text. There are a great number of Hebrew words left untranslated in the Gospel of Matthew. Hebrew word puns are in many parts included, these word puns would make no sense if the original writing had been in...

The Jean du Tillet's Matthew can not be accepted as valid for he confesses to making changes to this gospel in order to bring it in line with the current Matthean Text Seventeen early writers assert that Matthew wrote his Gospel in Hebrew. so these guys were just lying? Papias 150-170 AD...

I have in my possession the Shem-Tob A Hebrew gospel of Matthew, which indeed has a different rendering of Matthew 28:19 If you think I am lying, you can buy your own copy at Amazon .

There is nothing in here to indicate that the covenant will last 7 years, nothing at all. Yes Jesus made a new covenant, it is an everlasting covenant. Jesus did confirm the covenant for one week. 3 and a half years of his ministry. 3 and a half years of the Church to the Jews. at the end of...

Yes Jesus did make a covenant. "This is the blood of the new covenant" and there is nothing that indicates the covenant is to last for 7 years, it is a misreading of the scripture. Those are not proofs, they are simply assumptions with fanciful twisting of the word of God.

You assume too much.

The 70 weeks were continuous there is not one single scripture that says they are not, there is no proof anywhere that the 70 weeks were not continuous. The belief that there is a gap in the 70 weeks, is pure fiction. www.one-lord.org

Demonstratio Evangelica (The Proof of the Gospel) Book 3 3:6 With one word and voice He said to His disciples: "Go, and make disciples of all the nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." And He joined the effect to His Word; 3:7 Whereas He...

[a] finish the transgression = Jesus was crucified for our transgressions, at the cross he said "it is finished" [b ] and to make an end of sins,=but now once at the end of the ages hath he been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. [c] and to make reconciliation for iniquity...

Dan. 9:27 – “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon...

Seventeen early writers assert that Matthew wrote his Gospel in Hebrew. Papias 150-170 AD “Matthew composed the words in the Hebrew dialect, and each translated as he was able.” Ireneus 170 AD “Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect.” Clement of Alexandria...

Matthew 28:19 is an early fabrication. The original Hebrew text said "In my name" Eusebius testified about it over 18 times. www.one-lord.org

The trinity is an error of biblical interpretation. The bible never even says the word "trinity" It is only those without understanding and wisdom that see a trinity in the Bible. Sincerely www.one-lord.org

Yes Matthew 28:19 is a fabrication. the original text did not included the trinity. it simply said "in my name"

Jesus was not only God, but he is alone God, there is no such as a trinity, The doctrine of the trinity was not part of early christianity. Jesus clearly said, I am in the Father and the Father is in me. this is a clear declaration by Jesus that he and the father are the same one...