Search results

There you go again trying to dissect Jesus' hypostasis. The Son of Man did this and the Son of God did that?? What a complete perversion of the Scriptures. The Son of God and the Son of Man is the Hypostatic Union. You keep trying to dissect that which cannot be dissected. When you are...

I'll tell you what - I'll let Jesus explain this verse to you: Matt. 22:41-46 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, “What do you think about the Messiah? Whose son is he?” “The son of David,” they replied. He said to them, “How is it then that David, speaking by the...

WOW. I have explained this to 2nd graders who had a better understanding than you. R*E*A*D my last post. I explained - quite simply, I might add - that God is ONE. The fact that Jesus is a different PERSON than the Father doesn't mean that they are different GODS. The LORD is God the...

GOD. You are still failing to understand that He is ONE. God is ONE: The Father is GOD. The Son is GOD. The Holy Spirit is GOD. We are saved by the Grace of God alone. The Grace of God is fulfilled in EACH of the Persons in the Godhead. When you ask me WHO came to earth in the flesh to carry...

HUH??? I didn't say He WASN'T God I suggest that you read more carefully and pay attention to the posts.

I won't allow you to pigeonhole me into "yes" and "no" answers so that you can manipulate my words against me. That is a childish tactic and one that is not worthy of a intelligent or charitable discussion. As for the use of the Word, "was" in John 1:1 - it is NOT implying that Jesus WAS God...

Yes He was God from the BEGINNING (John 1:1) - BEFORE the Incarnation. As a matter of fact - His sacrifice is ALSO an eternal one. Rev. 13:8 tells us that Christ was crucified before the foundation of the world.

Your failure to understand the Person of Jesus is based on your inability to recognize the Hypostatic Union of His TWO natures: 100% Man 100% God The verses I have shown you point to the reality of His hypostasis. If Jesus is the Son of God - he cannot be the Son of Man. HOWEVER, Hes is ALSO...

As I stated before - there has already been AMPLE evidence given but it has fallen on blind eyes and deaf ears. Such is the case with every heresy. Your claim that Jesus is the Father in the flesh is outlandish, given the context of Scripture. Throughout the Gospel, Jesus repeatedly refers to...

Actually, being fairly new to this forum, I'm still learning how to navigate my way around and didn't know that this thread existed. However, after reading all of your posts, it is pretty clear to me that you will cling to your heretical tradition rather than to embrace the Scripture verses...

YUP - and NONE of them teach the fairytale of a Pre-Tribulation "Rapture". As a matter of fact - NOBODY in the Historic Christian faith taught that for 1800 years. As I stated before - it was invented by John Nelson Darby around 1830. In short - you're following a completely manmade doctrine.

Maybe I'll use more, then. Something's bound to make those scales fall from your eyes . . .

WRONG. Works are not simply evidence of our faith. Once we believe - works are essential. In the Parable of the Sheep and Goats - Jesus isn't talking about those who are "already saved" but those who CHOSE to cooperate with God's grace and those who CHOSE not to cooperate with His grace...

The Bible never makes this claim. NOWHERE does the Bible state ANYTHING about a Pre-Tribulation evacuation of Christians known as the "Rapture". This is a false Protestant teaching that is only about 170 years old, which was conjured up by a man named John Nelson Darby, who became the father...

My mistake. I'll refer to his rantings as St. Peter does in 1 Pet. 3:16: "There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures."

Actually, it is YOU who needs to read the Scriptures with understanding - not blind hatred. Rev. 18:4 is referring to the Harlot of Babylon, which is a world power - not a religion. Most credible scholars understand that the Harlot of Babylon is either pagan Rome or apostate Jerusalem. Only...

Ummm, so, in other words, you don't have ANY proof that the Catholic Bible in 1953 contained a different collection of Books than the Catholic Bibles of today. Pretty much what I thought. Look - when you make absurd posts like this, charging me and the Church with "attacking" Protestants - it...

Not ONE Catholic doctrine is found in the Bible?? What about Baptism? What about The deity of Jesus Christ? What about the Resurrection?? What about Jesus' sacrifice on the cross for our sins? Don't make blanket statements that you cannot support. It only serves to expose your ignorance. So...

This is about as absurd as it gets. The fact that God always knew who would be saved does NOT support the false Calvinist doctrine of perseverence of the saints because Calvinism ALSO teaches the false doctrine of Double Predestination: God made some people expressly for the purpose of going to...

You have answered those three questions? Would you mide posting them again - or at least point me to the post?