Amillennial Error

[CoreIssue]

This doctrine denies the MK on earth, the Rapture, biblical literalism, the tribulation period and a lot more.

 

[CoreIssue]

In this video at 25:50 the amillennialist had no answer to where after the second coming what Isaiah said verses their belief eternity begins.

 

[CoreIssue]

 

[CoreIssue]

Pre-tribulation rapture

 

[Dave L]

View attachment 6091

Pre-tribulation rapture

The problem is, only the born again can see the Amillennial position. Otherwise they seek a physical kingdom of sight and not of faith.

 

[CoreIssue]

 

[Dave L]

These want to walk by sight and not by faith. Only the born again can grasp the Amillennial position.

 

[CoreIssue]

Try responding to what is said here instead of posting clichés.

 

[Dave L]

Try responding to what is said here instead of posting clichés.

That only the born again can see the present kingdom is true according to Jesus.

 

[CoreIssue]

That only the born again can see the present kingdom is true according to Jesus.

Big claim no proof

 

[Enoch111]

The problem is, only the born again can see the Amillennial position.

There is no need to make such stupid remarks. There are tens of thousands of born-again Christians who reject the false doctrine of Amillennialism.

 

[Dave L]

There is no need to make such stupid remarks. There are tens of thousands of born-again Christians who reject the false doctrine of Amillennialism.

But where is the evidence of the new birth when they cannot see the kingdom right in front of them?

“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3)

 

[CoreIssue]

But where is the evidence of the new birth when they cannot see the kingdom right in front of them?

“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3)

That is not support for amillennialism.

 

[Naomi25]

Try responding to what is said here instead of posting clichés.

Snicker. Snort....teehee! Oh! The irony of this answer.

 

[Naomi25]

In this video at 25:50 the amillennialist had no answer to where after the second coming what Isaiah said verses their belief eternity begins.

Way to go with misrespresentation! Are you that eager to discredit Amillennialists, you're willing to be dishonest about what is said?
Because if you listen to this, Sam Storm is not without answer, he chuckles that they are wanting to go THAT DEEP at that time, but he is clearly willing (and able). John Piper says he thinks they must...but then the conversation moves to Doug...., not back to how Sam sees Isaiah. But trust me...Sam Storms both HAS an answer, and it's a biblically thought out one.

Any more LIES you want to throw out?

You clearly don't fully understand Amillennialism or what we believe. It's interesting to me that you've started...many threads, just attempting to tear it down. Why don't you start a thread going "Hey Amillennialists, let's have a conversation to grow understanding and awareness - and out of THAT increased understanding we can have discussions about disagreements".
That, at least, would be honest.

 

[CoreIssue]

Just look around us. It's so obvious that people are not going to be able to continue on their own without the intervention of God,

But amillennialist somehow see they can.

 

[CoreIssue]

How can anyone deny the Bible says Christ will return and physically roll the earth for a thousand years.

 

[CoreIssue]

Roman Catholicism says it has replaced Israel.

But that presented the problem of prophecy. So they rewrote huge chunks.

Now the woman of Revelation is Mary. The AC is now a future apostate pope.

They invented amillennialism to show Catholicism would rule during the MK on behalf of Christ.

Literal prophecy became figurative.

No one can show any other foundation for amillennialism then the Catholic Church.

 

[ScottA]

This doctrine denies the MK on earth, the Rapture, biblical literalism, the tribulation period and a lot more.

No, this is like the argument suggesting that Christ did away with the law, which he did not. But as he explained, he did not come to do away with the law and the prophets, but to "fulfill" it. Likewise, a would-be literal thousand year millennial kingdom explanation, does not mean there is none exactly according to the scriptures...but rather that it explains it in its true spiritual meaning.

First of all, time, is made up, "created", even proven non-existent by science. So...just as all things manifest by God to declare them to men in their sight, time is merely a form of media which has no literal spiritual reality. On the contrary, God is real, and in fact it is the kingdom of God that is the standard of what is actually literal - not the would-be natural laws of this fallen world. All of which means that the term "a thousand years" is simply a translation of a reality of God that may take that long for fallen men to grasp it. Nothing more. So, unless one is willing to go through "the renewing of your mind", yes, you are looking at a thousand years...and the term could just as well have been "not in your lifetime."

Thus, this whole argument and difference of belief and opinion...is really just the measure of who is where in the process of coming around to thinking as God thinks, as opposed to the way men think.

Otherwise, the scriptures are absolutely true...they just need to be understood properly. Meaning that actual "biblical literalism" is a far cry from worldly literalism...and cannot actually be explained or understood "literally" in worldly terms.

 

[Dave L]

In this video at 25:50 the amillennialist had no answer to where after the second coming what Isaiah said verses their belief eternity begins.

The restoration of Israel happens in the resurrection of believers into the new heavens and earth on the last day.