Democrats/mainstream conspiracy theory exposed

[Cristo Rei]

New Documents Prove Adam Schiff Lied About Trump-Russia Collusion

Over the past several years, CNN, MSNBC & the networks just could not get enough of Adam Schiff who repeatedly pushed the claim about Trump-Russia collusion.

However, newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff flat out lied about Russia and Donald Trump for three years.

Last week, the House Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

“From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

In December 2017 he told CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help.” In April 2018, Mr. Schiff released his response to Mr. Nunes’s report, stating that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.”

None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it. In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”

And it wasn’t just Schiff who lied and pushed the false collusion narrative. Members of the deep state knew there was no collusion.

So what price will Schiff pay for the lies he told repeated over the past three years. Nothing. He’ll still be invited back on CNN, MSNBC along with the networks and the journalist will complain why Trump attacks them and why the general public not only doesn’t trust them, but bitterly despises them.

https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2020-05-13-new-documents-prove-adam-schiff-lied-about-trump-russia-collusion/

The democrats have been peddling this Russia collusion conspiracy theory since Trump won the election. Trump has labelled the scandal "Obamagate" as it looks like Obama and Biden were a part of the conspiracy.

The mainstream media have been so obsessed with trying to discredit the president that they have been presenting fake news.
Even now they're more interested in hanging of every word that Trump says instead of reporting on the coronavirus.
They won't report on the sexual assault allegations against Biden and they won't report on this either, they're liars and cannot be trusted

 

[Justadude]

Dude, you need to understand what specific terms mean in law, and how the article you posted either is ignorant of the differences or is deliberately lying and hoping their readers won't know....

“From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

Note here there is no actual quote from Schiff saying anything about "proving a plot".

In December 2017 he told CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help.” In April 2018, Mr. Schiff released his response to Mr. Nunes’s report, stating that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.”

And that's still true to this day. As the Mueller Report documented, there were well over 100 contacts between Russians and members of the trump campaign.

None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it. In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.”

Note here the change in specific terms...from Schiff talking about "collusion" to Clapper talking about "conspiring to meddle with the election". If you read the Mueller Report, you'll see why those are very different legal concepts.

"Collusion" refers to contacting and working with someone in an ad hoc manner, whereas "conspiring" means when you deliberately plan and plot beforehand. As Mueller explained, "colluding" with foreigners during a campaign isn't a crime, but conspiring to do so is. So while he documented plenty of Trump campaign--Russian contacts and interactions about the campaign, he couldn't prove that they deliberately conspired to interfere in the election (and as he explained, in part because so many involved lied to investigators and/or destroyed evidence).

Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”

Since those quotes are three months later, we need to know what specifically they were talking about. Notice how the article leaves that out.

And it wasn’t just Schiff who lied and pushed the false collusion narrative. Members of the deep state knew there was no collusion.

And now we're back to "collusion".

So you see what they did, right? They quote Schiff talking about "collusion", then try and quote Clapper talking about a "conspiracy to interfere in the election" as if that contradicted him, then quoted Lynch and Yates talking about....well, they don't say what, and finish by declaring they'd proved Schiff lied when he was talking about "collusion". And the whole time they're hoping their readers won't notice the switch, or won't understand why the diiference between the two terms is important.

The democrats have been peddling this Russia collusion conspiracy theory since Trump won the election. Trump has labelled the scandal "Obamagate" as it looks like Obama and Biden were a part of the conspiracy.

And when asked what "Obamagate" referred to, Trump could only say "You know what the crime is. The crime is very obvious to everybody."

All I can say is, try and be a bit more discerning, especially when an article "tickles your ears". That's when it's easiest to put one over on you.

 

[Cristo Rei]

Dude, you need to understand what specific terms mean in law, and how the article you posted either is ignorant of the differences or is deliberately lying and hoping their readers won't know....


Note here there is no actual quote from Schiff saying anything about "proving a plot".

And that's still true to this day. As the Mueller Report documented, there were well over 100 contacts between Russians and members of the trump campaign.


Note here the change in specific terms...from Schiff talking about "collusion" to Clapper talking about "conspiring to meddle with the election". If you read the Mueller Report, you'll see why those are very different legal concepts.

"Collusion" refers to contacting and working with someone in an ad hoc manner, whereas "conspiring" means when you deliberately plan and plot beforehand. As Mueller explained, "colluding" with foreigners during a campaign isn't a crime, but conspiring to do so is. So while he documented plenty of Trump campaign--Russian contacts and interactions about the campaign, he couldn't prove that they deliberately conspired to interfere in the election (and as he explained, in part because so many involved lied to investigators and/or destroyed evidence).


Since those quotes are three months later, we need to know what specifically they were talking about. Notice how the article leaves that out.


And now we're back to "collusion".

So you see what they did, right? They quote Schiff talking about "collusion", then try and quote Clapper talking about a "conspiracy to interfere in the election" as if that contradicted him, then quoted Lynch and Yates talking about....well, they don't say what, and finish by declaring they'd proved Schiff lied when he was talking about "collusion". And the whole time they're hoping their readers won't notice the switch, or won't understand why the diiference between the two terms is important.


And when asked what "Obamagate" referred to, Trump could only say "You know what the crime is. The crime is very obvious to everybody."

All I can say is, try and be a bit more discerning, especially when an article "tickles your ears". That's when it's easiest to put one over on you.

I don't know all these details, im an Aussie. LoL
All I know is that they've been going on about this since Trump took office, a constant bombardment
And now reports are saying it was all an elaborate hoax

https://nypost.com/2020/05/08/adam-schiff-lied-about-the-trump-probe-and-the-media-let-him/
Andrew McCarthy: Trump-Russia probe was baseless, newly disclosed memo confirms – KDXU 94.9 890
So What Was The Russia Hoax Really About? — Manhattan Contrarian
Russia Hoax Archives - American Greatness

 

[marksman]

New Documents Prove Adam Schiff Lied About Trump-Russia Collusion

Over the past several years, CNN, MSNBC & the networks just could not get enough of Adam Schiff who repeatedly pushed the claim about Trump-Russia collusion.

However, newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff flat out lied about Russia and Donald Trump for three years.

Last week, the House Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

“From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

In December 2017 he told CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help.” In April 2018, Mr. Schiff released his response to Mr. Nunes’s report, stating that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.”

None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it. In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”

And it wasn’t just Schiff who lied and pushed the false collusion narrative. Members of the deep state knew there was no collusion.

So what price will Schiff pay for the lies he told repeated over the past three years. Nothing. He’ll still be invited back on CNN, MSNBC along with the networks and the journalist will complain why Trump attacks them and why the general public not only doesn’t trust them, but bitterly despises them.

https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2020-05-13-new-documents-prove-adam-schiff-lied-about-trump-russia-collusion/

The democrats have been peddling this Russia collusion conspiracy theory since Trump won the election. Trump has labelled the scandal "Obamagate" as it looks like Obama and Biden were a part of the conspiracy.

The mainstream media have been so obsessed with trying to discredit the president that they have been presenting fake news.
Even now they're more interested in hanging of every word that Trump says instead of reporting on the coronavirus.
They won't report on the sexual assault allegations against Biden and they won't report on this either, they're liars and cannot be trusted

It sounds like you were describing the media in Australia. Ever since Scott Morrison won the unwinnable election, the media had pursued him to try and bring him down and destabilize the government. They try to slaughter him because he went on holiday during the bush fires but said nothing about the Labor leaders who did the same.

Every labor leader and the media has pointed out everything he is doing wrong with managing the COVID-19 virus but ignoring everything he is doing right with the virus which the people of Australia say overrules what is wrong.

And the mainstream media, commonly known as the lamestream media give pride of place to all things homosexual.

So if you want to know the truth, you have to search out the alternative media whose main interest is the facts, not the opinion of an ideological reporter who is pushing only one line according to his ideology and hate-filled bias and where facts are an also-ran.

From outside America, it seems that the Democrats or is that the Demonrats are still seething that their pride and joy did not win the presidency, hence the stupid impeachment fiasco and their attempts to bring Trump down by fair means or foul.

 

[Enoch111]

Over the past several years, CNN, MSNBC & the networks just could not get enough of Adam Schiff who repeatedly pushed the claim about Trump-Russia collusion.

What is really disturbing is that the Republican congressmen and senators have simply stood by and allow this evil man to continue spewing his garbage day after day instead of taking appropriate action to remove him from office. Greg Gutfield wants something done immediately.

Greg Gutfeld: Something Has Got To Be Done About Adam Schiff (VIDEO)
[Note: video excluded here]

During an episode of The Five on FOX News this week, Greg Gutfeld said that Adam Schiff needs to suffer some form of consequences for what he put the country through over the last three years.

When it comes to the Russia investigation and the Democrat impeachment circus, Schiff was the ringleader and he wasted America’s time.

Greg’s point is valid. Here’s what Greg Said: “I hate to act like the very worst of the media, the very worst of the Democrats, demanding that this person get locked up and this person be tried, and this person go away…” “But something’s gotta be done for Adam Schiff.”

“Because he created three years of a massive fallacy that did so much damage to this country. And made us miss probably one of the most important stories of our lifetime.”

“We were having hearings on impeachment while the Coronavirus was exploding.”

A recent editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggested that Schiff should no longer be believed by anyone.

From the Washington Examiner:

Wall Street Journal: ‘No one should ever believe another word’ from Schiff

The Wall Street Journal editorial board urged the media and the public to never again trust House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff because of his repeated claims over the years that there was evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The editorial, which was published on Tuesday, reacted to the House Intelligence Committee releasing dozens of witness interview transcripts and related material regarding its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“Schiff spread falsehoods shamelessly about Russia and Donald Trump for three years even as his own committee gathered contrary evidence,” it wrote. The editorial board also argued the California Democrat had previously held up the release of the transcripts because they didn’t align with what he was saying publicly.

Schiff should at the very least, lose his committee appointments. Legal action would also seem appropriate.

Greg Gutfeld: Something Has Got To Be Done About Adam Schiff (VIDEO)

 

[Enoch111]

And it wasn’t just Schiff who lied and pushed the false collusion narrative. Members of the deep state knew there was no collusion.

And the daily liars in the mainstream media have all been co-conspirators with Schiff and all the evil Democrats and Deep State operatives. Who is going to deal with their nefarious actions?

 

[Josho]

It sounds like you were describing the media in Australia. Ever since Scott Morrison won the unwinnable election, the media had pursued him to try and bring him down and destabilize the government. They try to slaughter him because he went on holiday during the bush fires but said nothing about the Labor leaders who did the same.

Every labor leader and the media has pointed out everything he is doing wrong with managing the COVID-19 virus but ignoring everything he is doing right with the virus which the people of Australia say overrules what is wrong.

And the mainstream media, commonly known as the lamestream media give pride of place to all things homosexual.

So if you want to know the truth, you have to search out the alternative media whose main interest is the facts, not the opinion of an ideological reporter who is pushing only one line according to his ideology and hate-filled bias and where facts are an also-ran.

From outside America, it seems that the Democrats or is that the Demonrats are still seething that their pride and joy did not win the presidency, hence the stupid impeachment fiasco and their attempts to bring Trump down by fair means or foul.

But didn't the media also try to bring down the last 2 Labor Prime Ministers also?

 

[Cristo Rei]

It sounds like you were describing the media in Australia. Ever since Scott Morrison won the unwinnable election, the media had pursued him to try and bring him down and destabilize the government. They try to slaughter him because he went on holiday during the bush fires but said nothing about the Labor leaders who did the same.

Every labor leader and the media has pointed out everything he is doing wrong with managing the COVID-19 virus but ignoring everything he is doing right with the virus which the people of Australia say overrules what is wrong.

And the mainstream media, commonly known as the lamestream media give pride of place to all things homosexual.

So if you want to know the truth, you have to search out the alternative media whose main interest is the facts, not the opinion of an ideological reporter who is pushing only one line according to his ideology and hate-filled bias and where facts are an also-ran.

From outside America, it seems that the Democrats or is that the Democrats are still seething that their pride and joy did not win the presidency, hence the stupid impeachment fiasco and their attempts to bring Trump down by fair means or foul.

Your totally right. Its funny cos the Aussies are doing exactly what the Americans did
Trump won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media
ScoMo won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media

I would say the left and the media have actually backed off a bit on ScoMo during the covid
In the USA they didn't stop giving it to Trump but from here it doesn't look like they've landed any punches

I used to always vote Labour (left wing party) cos they used to be for the working class.
Then they became too ideological so i started voting Liberal (right wing party)

Our left wing party is far left and our right wing party is left of center.
It was the Liberal party that introduced gay marriage remember.
A real conservative party would of never allowed that to happen under their watch

All our free to air channels are left wing bias. I go to sky news to get more honest journalism

 

[Cristo Rei]

But didn't the media also try to bring down the last 2 Labor Prime Ministers also?

Yea a little bit. Your talking about the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd
Rudd was in power but his own party was plotting to overthrow him with Gillard cos he wanted to put a carbon tax on mining
So the media backed the Gillard movement and smeared Rudd.
Then off course the Labour party plotted to overthrow Gillard with Rudd again and the media backed him.

Our free to air channels are left wing. That saga only shows the media siding with the main movement within the Labour party

A similar thing recently happened in the USA when the dems and the media turned on Bernie Sanders in order to get Joe Biden picked

 

[Cristo Rei]

The mainstream media was prepared to lie to us for almost 4 years about this Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theory

How then can we trust their reporting on this Chinese flu??? We simply can't

 

[Josho]

Yea a little bit. Your talking about the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd
Rudd was in power but his own party was plotting to overthrow him with Gillard cos he wanted to put a carbon tax on mining
So the media backed the Gillard movement and smeared Rudd.
Then off course the Labour party plotted to overthrow Gillard with Rudd again and the media backed him.

Our free to air channels are left wing. That saga only shows the media siding with the main movement within the Labour party

A similar thing recently happened in the USA when the dems and the media turned on Bernie Sanders in order to get Joe Biden picked

I do remember how much they smeared them on the Herald Sun though, they copped a smacking for the Carbon tax.

Don't think the Gonski was too popular either, I could be wrong though. My biggest concern when Julia was PM, was that school years were gonna be extended or she would make school tougher, as she was the former Labor education minister after all. hahahahha

 

[Cristo Rei]

I do remember how much they smeared them on the Herald Sun though, they copped a smacking for the Carbon tax.

Don't think the Gonski was too popular either, I could be wrong though. My biggest concern when Julia was PM, was that school years were gonna be extended or she would make school tougher, as she was the former Labor education minister after all. hahahahha

Ye that's why u took notice cos u were at school... LoL...
Gillard was too much of an ideologue. She started the smear campaign against Tony Abbott when she gave this stupid speech in parliament accusing him of being a misogynist. Totally unfounded, the man has a wife and three daughters so it was really a ludicrous accusation
Feminism doesn't belong in parliament

 

[APAK]

Your totally right. Its funny cos the Aussies are doing exactly what the Americans did
Trump won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media
ScoMo won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media

I would say the left and the media have actually backed off a bit on ScoMo during the covid
In the USA they didn't stop giving it to Trump but from here it doesn't look like they've landed any punches

I used to always vote Labour (left wing party) cos they used to be for the working class.
Then they became too ideological so i started voting Liberal (right wing party)

Our left wing party is far left and our right wing party is left of center.
It was the Liberal party that introduced gay marriage remember.
A real conservative party would of never allowed that to happen under their watch

All our free to air channels are left wing bias. I go to sky news to get more honest journalism

Sky News....not like CNN or the BBC ....

The Demos (libs, progressives) over here are not just left, they are left of left - deep socialists and neo-commies. This Party is dying right before our eyes. Not wanting it, I do see a type of civil war erupting in these States fairly soon. If this so-called Democratic party persists on debasing and corrupting the culture of these States with its media trolls, parrots and scum-eaters, for much longer, all heck will surly ensue?? Who knows, maybe the Democrats, out of their futile desperate attempt to survive have already triggered their pre-planned suicide bomb to explode in stages to make the States an undesirable entity for the NWO..

Blessings,

APAK

 

[Cristo Rei]

Sky News....not like CNN or the BBC ....

The Demos (libs, progressives) over here are not just left, they are left of left - deep socialists and neo-commies. This Party is dying right before our eyes. Not wanting it, I do see a type of civil war erupting in these States fairly soon. If this so-called Democratic party persists on debasing and corrupting the culture of these States with its media trolls, parrots and scum-eaters, for much longer, all heck will surly ensue?? Who knows, maybe the Democrats, out of their futile desperate attempt to survive have already triggered their pre-planned suicide bomb to explode in stages to make the States an undesirable entity for the NWO..

Blessings,

APAK

Haha I cracked up how u described the demo as left of left. Their left of left of left of left. Their of the chart basically. Radical left I usually call em.

I keep getting confused cos u have the Kiwi flag but u live in the states, right?

The dems are far left but their also heavy authoritarian as opposed to libertarian. They openly call themselves socialists

 

[APAK]

Haha I cracked up how u described the demo as left of left. Their left of left of left of left. Their of the chart basically. Radical left I usually call em.

I keep getting confused cos u have the Kiwi flag but u live in the states, right?

The dems are far left but their also heavy authoritarian as opposed to libertarian. They openly call themselves socialists

Yep, lived in the States for most of my adult life, been back to NZ last time in 2009, now in Florida, West of Disney World..

...those left of left...they have made a new political spectrum..and they are not left or right in it...they are at the center of it, as they see it, if you get my drift...

APAK out
the Avatar I have displayed is actually a NZ memorabilia rugby ball made by Gilbert

 

[Justadude]

I don't know all these details, im an Aussie. LoL
All I know is that they've been going on about this since Trump took office, a constant bombardment
And now reports are saying it was all an elaborate hoax

https://nypost.com/2020/05/08/adam-schiff-lied-about-the-trump-probe-and-the-media-let-him/
Andrew McCarthy: Trump-Russia probe was baseless, newly disclosed memo confirms – KDXU 94.9 890
So What Was The Russia Hoax Really About? — Manhattan Contrarian
Russia Hoax Archives - American Greatness

My rule of thumb is to not let media outlets tell me what's in a report, study, or things like that. If I can go look for myself, I do. Also, I think it's always a good idea to be aware of and take into account the bias of various sources. If you're watching Fox News, appreciate that they're biased to the right. Likewise, appreciate that MSNBC is biased to the left. And in this day and age, it's really important to recognize outlets that are nothing more than propaganda and/or purveyors of false information.

I think it's usually a good idea to look at multiple news outlets, but only as long as you understand who they are.

 

[Cristo Rei]

My rule of thumb is to not let media outlets tell me what's in a report, study, or things like that. If I can go look for myself, I do. Also, I think it's always a good idea to be aware of and take into account the bias of various sources. If you're watching Fox News, appreciate that they're biased to the right. Likewise, appreciate that MSNBC is biased to the left. And in this day and age, it's really important to recognize outlets that are nothing more than propaganda and/or purveyors of false information.

I think it's usually a good idea to look at multiple news outlets, but only as long as you understand who they are.

I agree. I don't think there are any neutral media outlets. The bias that each network has is something that not many people are aware of.
I'll often see one narrative from Fox and another from CNN. I take it with a pinch of salt, the truth usually lays somewhere in between.
So it's good to know which channels are batting for who

Journalism wasn't always like this apart from war time propaganda.
I wonder how political ideologies became the main focus of networks. Do u know cos I don't.
I have a feeling it involves large sums of money, but from who

 

[marksman]

New Documents Prove Adam Schiff Lied About Trump-Russia Collusion

Over the past several years, CNN, MSNBC & the networks just could not get enough of Adam Schiff who repeatedly pushed the claim about Trump-Russia collusion.

However, newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff flat out lied about Russia and Donald Trump for three years.

Last week, the House Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

“From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

In December 2017 he told CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help.” In April 2018, Mr. Schiff released his response to Mr. Nunes’s report, stating that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.”

None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it. In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”

And it wasn’t just Schiff who lied and pushed the false collusion narrative. Members of the deep state knew there was no collusion.

So what price will Schiff pay for the lies he told repeated over the past three years. Nothing. He’ll still be invited back on CNN, MSNBC along with the networks and the journalist will complain why Trump attacks them and why the general public not only doesn’t trust them, but bitterly despises them.

https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2020-05-13-new-documents-prove-adam-schiff-lied-about-trump-russia-collusion/

The democrats have been peddling this Russia collusion conspiracy theory since Trump won the election. Trump has labelled the scandal "Obamagate" as it looks like Obama and Biden were a part of the conspiracy.

The mainstream media have been so obsessed with trying to discredit the president that they have been presenting fake news.
Even now they're more interested in hanging of every word that Trump says instead of reporting on the coronavirus.
They won't report on the sexual assault allegations against Biden and they won't report on this either, they're liars and cannot be trusted

Your totally right. Its funny cos the Aussies are doing exactly what the Americans did
Trump won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media
ScoMo won unexpectedly and the left resort to criticizing every word along with the media

I would say the left and the media have actually backed off a bit on ScoMo during the covid
In the USA they didn't stop giving it to Trump but from here it doesn't look like they've landed any punches

I used to always vote Labour (left wing party) cos they used to be for the working class.
Then they became too ideological so i started voting Liberal (right wing party)

Our left wing party is far left and our right wing party is left of center.
It was the Liberal party that introduced gay marriage remember.
A real conservative party would of never allowed that to happen under their watch

All our free to air channels are left wing bias. I go to sky news to get more honest journalism

One small point. Same-sex marriage was introduced by a left-wing Coalition PM who was labor in disguise.

 

[marksman]

But didn't the media also try to bring down the last 2 Labor Prime Ministers also?

As I remember the last two labor PMs before Bill Shorten became the leader was brought down by him. Bill Shorten was brought down by quiet Australians.

 

[Josho]

One small point. Same-sex marriage was introduced by a left-wing Coalition PM who was labor in disguise.

Only a very few Liberal members under Turnbull's government stood up for traditional marriage.

Scott Morrison walked out during the vote though.