Derek Chauvin's Lawyer Asks For A New Trial

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,682
16,014
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
It's about time. The first trial was a travesty of justice. Also, today there is one law for blacks and another one for whites. There is one law for Leftist rioters and another law for conservatives opposed to Socialism and Communism. There is one law for illegal migrants and another law for legal immigrants. There is one law for criminals in high office, and another law for ordinary law-abiding citizens. In fact America and Canada are now under Communist rule, so one should not expect justice. Only kangaroo courts. And that is unacceptable.
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,623
14,949
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
GROUNDS ~
According to the motion, Chauvin challenges the court’s denial of a request for a change of venue, its denial of an earlier motion for a new trial, its failure to sequester the jury, and the prejudicial mistakes made by the prosecution. The motion also calls for an impeachment of the verdict on the grounds of jury misconduct.
Source jurist.org

 
  • Like
Reactions: Enoch111

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,623
14,949
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is astounding for a high profile case that the jury was NOT sequestered (which means physically contained, so they can NOT discusse the proceedings with other people).
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,623
14,949
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is astounding the case (having been TRIED in the pseudo court of the Public Media), was not allowed to be transfered to another requested Jurisdiction, as the Law allows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: APAK

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,682
16,014
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
It is astounding the case (having been TRIED in the pseudo court of the Public Media), was not allowed to be transfered to another requested Jurisdiction, as the Law allows.
This could only happen under the rule of lawless imposter Biden and his corruption of the justice system. WHERE ARE THE CALLS FOR IMPEACHMENT?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reggie Belafonte

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,682
16,014
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
  • Like
Reactions: Taken

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,623
14,949
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This could only happen under the rule of lawless imposter Biden and his corruption of the justice system. WHERE ARE THE CALLS FOR IMPEACHMENT?

And the radical unconstitutionally qualified thing that would step into the people's office...
UGH
 

Amazed@grace

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2021
1,611
1,388
113
futurum, ubi non sunt atheus troglodytae
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Given the world wide attention the particulars of this case has received, where could a jury be impaneled and to insure no one on that jury had heard of the particulars? And add to that the news of this request for a new trial. Who hasn't heard of this new news?

It was wrong not to sequester this jury. So many mistakes one might think the state wanted to insure Chauvin didn't really go to prison like he so deserves.

I wonder if he'll get a new 1 million dollar bail?
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,682
16,014
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
And the radical unconstitutionally qualified thing that would step into the people's office...UGH
Both have to be impeached at the same time, and removed at the same time as co-conspirators.
 

Amazed@grace

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2021
1,611
1,388
113
futurum, ubi non sunt atheus troglodytae
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
And the radical unconstitutionally qualified thing that would step into the people's office...
UGH
If both were impeached, president and VP? Which would make history, the speaker of the house would take office until a new election is held.
President Pelosi. :confused:

But it will never happen. Democrats are the majority in Congress.
Then again, there is that pesky detail called, grounds for impeachment, to get past
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taken