Do you believe the return of the Lord is imminent ?
Do you believe specific Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled in our time?
Do you believe specific Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled in our time?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I appreciate your straight answer .No, as a pre-wrather I don't believe the bible teaches imminency. I believe the stage is being set up for the fulfillment of biblical prophecies and they will be completed in our lifetime, realizing tho that several other generations of believers thought that as well.
Would you care to give a time frame?The most recent event I can think of was the election of Obama as president. I believe that God was giving us an example of how an "unknown" can have a world-wide 85% approval rating and get elected while being totally incompetent and having accomplished nothing worthwhile to deserve that opportunity. I also believe the Middle East will soon be involved in what "might" become WW3 which, imo, will open the door for the person whom most of Israel will believe is their Messiah, for a while anyways until God opens the eyes of His elect remnant and we can see the world spiraling out of control while losing any respect for God and mostly denying His very existence.
I think the world is "ripe" for an open rebellion against God and His teachings as explained by Paul in 2 Tim. 3:1-5 - "This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
[sup]2 [/sup]For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
[sup]3 [/sup]Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
[sup]4 [/sup]Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
[sup]5 [/sup]Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away."
Do you believe the return of the Lord is imminent ?
Do you believe specific Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled in our time?
Would you care to give a time frame?
I take it then you do NOT see prophetic fulfillment wrt Israel/1948 ?
Telling the cowardly VETERAN to back up his charges with quotes = the devil's game.You all need to stop playing Hitch's game, and start asking questions about what he/she believes, even though I doubt you'll even get a straight answer then, since that's the devil's game he/she's playing.
Telling the cowardly VETERAN to back up his charges with quotes = the devil's game.
Well why not futurism ,at its heart is liberal modernism , and it shows :)
New to reading ?Again, your fear is showing. It's because of the games you're trying to play here.
So far, we know you do not believe in the literal second coming of Jesus Christ back to this earth.
That narrows your belief down to either Full Preterism of Orthodox Judaism, or that of a totally different religion than Christianity.
Show me where my Lord Jesus Christ is specifically sitting upon The Father's Throne in Heaven? Or better yet, show me where Jesus Christ is now sitting upon David's throne.
New to reading ?
* Raising the dead ,on the last day,not you believe him anyway, does not requite his bodily presence, obviously he could do so from heaven. As you know there is strong evidence in Scripture and in the Creed copied above, that he will appear bodily to do just that. Since, contrary to your claims, this event happens at the 'last day' final judgement is rendered as mankind is raised from the dead and enters the eternal state.
You are lying .Again . [ ^_^
Show me where my Lord Jesus Christ is specifically sitting upon The Father's Throne in Heaven? Or better yet, show me where Jesus Christ is now sitting upon David's throne.
A That is what the Right Hand of Power means stupid.
B Dave;'s throne ,as was Sol's , were typical of the heavenly throne.
C You 're pathetic
Well if one rejects the account in Acts. but I believe itRight hand of WHO's throne did you say? Oh yeah, you didn't say. That could mean your idea of that throne could be ANYBODY'S then.
Returned to dust , duh, . No coward Jesus will not find Dave's old chair clean it up and use it, Dave's throne was typical of the heavenly.David's throne is where today?
I don't see ANY Scripture support you're giving on that, did we miss it somewhere that posted?
(What does it mean brethren when someone falsely accuses... a believer that does post Scripture proof to back what they say, BY someone who does not back their words up with Scripture proof? That's a hypocrite, isn't it?)
Well if one rejects the account in Acts. but I believe it Returned to dust , duh, . No coward Jesus will not find Dave's old chair clean it up and use it, Dave's throne was typical of the heavenly.
First of all He didint ascend from the Mt of Olives secondly the last enemy is death, destroyed by resurrection. See jr the heavely throne was typified by Dave's seat of power over Israel, it was in reality the Lord's throne,and your semi dispensationalist ramblings are meaningless.This what you're referring to?
Acts 2:29-35
29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day.
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, He would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that His soul was not left in hell, neither His flesh did see corruption.
32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, He hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.
(KJV)
Notice nowhere does that say Christ is now sitting upon David's throne in Heaven, nor upon The Father's Throne, but on the RIGHT HAND OF GOD'S THRONE.
The following is the time WHEN Jesus shall sit upon HIS Own throne...
Matt 19:28-29
28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed Me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of His glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for My name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.
(KJV)
In the "regeneration"? When His Apostles will also sit upon twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel? Well when is all that supposed to happen? Has it occurred yet today? No. It will occur at the time of Christ's SECOND COMING back to this earth.
Matt 25:31-34
31 When the Son of man shall come in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon the throne of His glory:
32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
33 And He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left.
34 Then shall the King say unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
(KJV)
When the Son of man (Jesus Christ) COMES IN HIS GLORY? And ALL THE HOLY ANGELS WITH HIM? THEN He shall sit upon the throne of His glory? Yes, and that has not happened yet today! Until then, He is sitting at the right hand of The Father UNTIL what? Until all His enemies be made His footstool. And that means until He TAKES... reign over all the nations and peoples on this earth.
That will occur ONLY at Christ Jesus' second coming per Acts 1 which declares He returns in like manner HOW He ascended to Heaven, which involves the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, ON EARTH.
See jr the heavely throne was typified by Dave's seat of power over Israel, it was in reality the Lord's throne,and your semi dispensationalist ramblings are meaningless.
This is like killing a mouse with a shotgun.
First of all He didint ascend from the Mt of Olives
secondly the last enemy is death, destroyed by resurrection.
LOL You idiot, you are in need of remedial reading.Acts 1:9-12
9 And when He had spoken these things, while they beheld, He was taken up; and a cloud received Him out of their sight.
10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;
11 Which also said, "Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven."
12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.
(KJV)
That Scripture makes you a liar.
Yeah at the last day, just like Jesus said. What is wicked is YOU and your slander trying to imply that I've posted otherwise. You are disgusting. And a shame to the church.The last enemy is not destroyed yet today, for people are still dying. And there's still 'spiritually dead' people walking around without Christ Jesus. As a matter of fact per God's Word, the concept of 'death' is not destroyed until the "second death" of Rev.20, which is... the casting into the "lake of fire". Assuming that has happened is a support of wickedness, because death will be destroyed in the "lake of fire" along with the wicked.
Rev 20:14-15
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
(KJV)
LOL You idiot, you are in need of remedial reading.
This is your quote ;
12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey
It clearly states they returned from the Mount, get a grip , it doest say He ascended from that Mount. Duh Yeah at the last day, just like Jesus said. What is wicked is YOU and your slander trying to imply that I've posted otherwise. You are disgusting. And a shame to the church.
Bethany has traditionally been identified with the present-day West Bank city of al-Eizariya (Arabic, meaning "Place of Lazarus"), site of the reputed Tomb of Lazarus, located about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) to the east of Jerusalem on the south-eastern slope of the Mount of Olives.[sup][1][/sup] The oldest house in present-day al-Eizariya, a 2,000 year old dwelling reputed to have been (or which at least serves as a reminder of) the House of Martha and Mary, is also a popular pilgrimage site.[sup][2][/sup]
The tomb in al-Eizariya has been identified as the tomb of the gospel account since at least the 4th century AD. Both the historian Eusebius of Caesarea[sup][3][/sup] (c. 330) and the Bordeaux pilgrim in the Itinerarium Burdigalense[sup][4][/sup] (c. 333) mention the Tomb of Lazarus in this location.
Zanecchia (1899), however, argued that ancient Bethany may actually have been located higher up the Mount of Olives from al-Eizariya, closer to Bethphage.[sup][5][/sup] The Catholic Encyclopedia refers to Zanecchia (though the Encyclopedia article's author himself discounts his conclusion):
Some believe that the present village of Bethany does not occupy the site of the ancient village; but that it grew up around the traditional cave which they suppose to have been at some distance from the house of Martha and Mary in the village; Zanecchia places the site of the ancient village of Bethany higher up on the southeastern slope of the Mount of Olives, not far from the accepted site of Bethphage, and near that of the Ascension. It is quite certain that the present village formed about the traditional tomb of Lazarus, which is in a cave in the village. The identification of this cave as the tomb of Lazarus is merely possible; it has no strong intrinsic or extrinsic authority. The site of the ancient village may not precisely coincide with the present one, but there is every reason to believe that it was in this general location, mostly by the local villagers who have become dependent on hearsay than on fact, to both the local council which leases this Christian site for an annual higher bid reached in 2007 to about 40,000 Jordanian Dinars per year, and those who lease the site, charging tourists a ONE US dollar fee per head,'an income otherwise non-existent""[sup][6][/sup]