Hi there,
So there is a glaring absence in the world of Evolution: a selection pressure of some description, had a consistent effect on some monkeys, at some stage and humanoid creatures developed from that pressure. However, it did not happen again, nor did it happen to other species, nor did the absence of this pressure at a later stage mean that the humanoids that developed reverted back to the species they were. Where is the selection pressure that resulted in humanoids of only one species? Where are the other selection pressures and humanoids? How does Evolution account for the humanoids that developed, as though the selection pressure was universal, yet only affected them?
Is there a progression from humanoid, to super humanoid? What would that selection pressure look like? Does chatGPT auger a new pressure to be creative in a way that couldn't be predicted, by normal canons of sense? Where is it written that new humanoids can't develop, while selection pressure for originality continues to peak? There is an answer that could have been predicted, if Evolution had been discovered sooner? Like if apes got wind that the selection pressure was coming, they could have become uber-apes? What exactly is the goal of a selection pressure? Is it to gather together all the semi-humanoid developments and bring them into agreement with one great humanoidal development? Isn't that greater humanoid strength, than a single humanoidal species popping into existence on its own?
There is something wrong with the idea that selection pressures are exclusive at all, isn't there? The whole point of a selection pressure in the humanoidal sense, is that you can't avoid it, it's in the world and you can't escape the world. A pattern of pressure that comes with the tides of change, somehow sifts those that want humanoidal development from those that don't? There is something cunning about that, you are only able to argue with the selection pressure if you know what it is and there is no way to know what it is, because it remains mysterious. The more mysterious it becomes, the harder it is to argue with it. It promises untapped power, that would make anything humanoidal, even before a species is ready to change? Is refusing it, still drawn into that power? Do you have to agree with its punctuated nature, precisely because you understand the concept "humanoidal" has to come from somewhere?
Does God not look to make Man, more humanoidal? Is distorting humanity unfairly, a sin? Are we called by God, to make something greater than human, of other species that have yet to change (as Man has)?
I welcome your thoughts.
God bless.
So there is a glaring absence in the world of Evolution: a selection pressure of some description, had a consistent effect on some monkeys, at some stage and humanoid creatures developed from that pressure. However, it did not happen again, nor did it happen to other species, nor did the absence of this pressure at a later stage mean that the humanoids that developed reverted back to the species they were. Where is the selection pressure that resulted in humanoids of only one species? Where are the other selection pressures and humanoids? How does Evolution account for the humanoids that developed, as though the selection pressure was universal, yet only affected them?
Is there a progression from humanoid, to super humanoid? What would that selection pressure look like? Does chatGPT auger a new pressure to be creative in a way that couldn't be predicted, by normal canons of sense? Where is it written that new humanoids can't develop, while selection pressure for originality continues to peak? There is an answer that could have been predicted, if Evolution had been discovered sooner? Like if apes got wind that the selection pressure was coming, they could have become uber-apes? What exactly is the goal of a selection pressure? Is it to gather together all the semi-humanoid developments and bring them into agreement with one great humanoidal development? Isn't that greater humanoid strength, than a single humanoidal species popping into existence on its own?
There is something wrong with the idea that selection pressures are exclusive at all, isn't there? The whole point of a selection pressure in the humanoidal sense, is that you can't avoid it, it's in the world and you can't escape the world. A pattern of pressure that comes with the tides of change, somehow sifts those that want humanoidal development from those that don't? There is something cunning about that, you are only able to argue with the selection pressure if you know what it is and there is no way to know what it is, because it remains mysterious. The more mysterious it becomes, the harder it is to argue with it. It promises untapped power, that would make anything humanoidal, even before a species is ready to change? Is refusing it, still drawn into that power? Do you have to agree with its punctuated nature, precisely because you understand the concept "humanoidal" has to come from somewhere?
Does God not look to make Man, more humanoidal? Is distorting humanity unfairly, a sin? Are we called by God, to make something greater than human, of other species that have yet to change (as Man has)?
I welcome your thoughts.
God bless.
