Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If you were in charge of a church, how would you run things?As I was reading earlier this evening a phrase in my book caught my attention and caused me to think.
The phrase was ‘organised religion’ and I began to wonder if that, in fact, is what is wrong with today’s churches – too much organisation and not enough spontaneity as we let the Holy Spirit lead.
That’s why I left ‘ Church ‘ Pearl…..convictions over the years about how things were done, or why they were done. They were following ‘ how ‘ things were planned and there was little deviation. In some respects I respect the Quakers, they sit in silence and if anyone feels led to speak they get up and speak.As I was reading earlier this evening a phrase in my book caught my attention and caused me to think.
The phrase was ‘organised religion’ and I began to wonder if that, in fact, is what is wrong with today’s churches – too much organisation and not enough spontaneity as we let the Holy Spirit lead.
Well obviously I'm not in charge of a church but if I was I would pray a lot and ask God what he wanted.If you were in charge of a church, how would you run things?
Yes @Rita that's why I left too. And I was just thinking about the Quakers before I read your post.That’s why I left ‘ Church ‘ Pearl…..convictions over the years about how things were done, or why they were done. They were following ‘ how ‘ things were planned and there was little deviation. In some respects I respect the Quakers, they sit in silence and if anyone feels led to speak they get up and speak.
History of the Quaker movement is interesting..the Quakers
I heard that Judi Dench is a Quaker.History of the Quaker movement is interesting..
---
I had discussions with some Quakers..years ago.
How about democratically electing leaders who would run the church? They would serve for a limited period of time, and then there would be another election, and another, and so on.Well obviously I'm not in charge of a church but if I was I would pray a lot and ask God what he wanted.
I believe things like this is why there is denomination, the Holy Spirit being all things to all people. Want organization? Go to denomination X. Want spontaneity? Go to denomination Y.As I was reading earlier this evening a phrase in my book caught my attention and caused me to think.
The phrase was ‘organised religion’ and I began to wonder if that, in fact, is what is wrong with today’s churches – too much organisation and not enough spontaneity as we let the Holy Spirit lead.
I agree Pearl. The pastors have to deal with building up keep, bills, and making sure that nice new rug is installed in the fellowship room! It has become to me, fall in line with EVERYTHING they teach, or you are a pariah, a divider.As I was reading earlier this evening a phrase in my book caught my attention and caused me to think.
The phrase was ‘organised religion’ and I began to wonder if that, in fact, is what is wrong with today’s churches – too much organisation and not enough spontaneity as we let the Holy Spirit lead.
This is way too cynical. Pastors are in many cases caretakers of the physical church (as well as the people of the church). They generally are responsible for keeping up the building, paying the bills, etc., in addition to their pastoral work.I agree Pearl. The pastors have to deal with building up keep, bills, and making sure that nice new rug is installed in the fellowship room! It has become to me, fall in line with EVERYTHING they teach, or you are a pariah, a divider.
God's Kingdom is not a democracy. That's the whole problem people like you treating as thought it were.How about democratically electing leaders who would run the church? They would serve for a limited period of time, and then there would be another election, and another, and so on.
Yes that's one of the problems with churches these days. The LDS church elects it's leaders from the higher ups and so does the Catholic church. God never did that. He calls a prophet himself or leaders. But men don't always have that option so they make the best decisions they can I suppose.God's Kingdom is not a democracy. That's the whole problem people like you treating as thought it were.
You should be aware that this phrase has been around for a long time and it originated with the cults, who reject fundamental Bible doctrine. So it is more or less a code phrase for rejecting anything that does not fit into their false beliefs....The phrase was ‘organised religion’...
Before I retired from my position as a church elder, that was how leaders in our church were chosen. They served as long as God wanted them to serve; there were no time limits. But if they or the congregation felt that it was time for a change, then a new election was held.How about democratically electing leaders who would run the church? They would serve for a limited period of time, and then there would be another election, and another, and so on.
God's Kingdom is not a democracy. That's the whole problem people like you treating as thought it were.
you pray and do it the best you feel led to.. everyone is looking for the perfect church with the perfect pastor run the perfect way.If you were in charge of a church, how would you run things?
no difference in non denom both have be structuredthis is why there is denomination,