I had one experience that I will write about and testify of on this forum:
I was on disabling medication for a time when the following happened. I am no longer on that medicine that caused the symptoms I will describe in this testimony:
I was advised to see a DSHS state appointed doctor who said they were acting on behalf of the Federal government for social security disability claims. My lawyer indicated that if I did not see that doctor of theirs they would simply deny my claim. I had a letter from my doctor and it said I could not maintain employment and was disabled or something to that effect.
I was to see a doctor and arrived at the appointment. There was some doctor switching by the state in letters to me. Also the business building I saw them at was not the same profession, if I remember correctly, of that doctor. And that was not really suspicious. I was told by people that it was a cognitive test. They were going to assess my disability level.
I made an intelligent list as directed to state dates and other information about "dizzy hallucinating" spells that I knew were disabling. They would be traumatic and also exhausting and would cause me to be forced to pass out in bed. I would almost always go unconscious and later recover. And those spells would last for hours. And happen around mid day. I realized that it would happen at work if I attempted to try and work for an employer. At the end of the meeting the doctor asked me to follow a "command". She asked me to pick up that list I made which was on the table next me which she refused to review. And told me to do something to it I don't recall and also place it in my bag. And then said the meeting was over.
Does that sound equal in rights between doctor and patient to anyone reading that statement I made and what evil is that in your opinion? "Commands" not reviewing evidence for a claim. And later they denied my claim in court and that was a judge reviewing the evidence pertaining to my claim.
The other suspicious behavior from the doctor was prior to the end when she asked something to the effect of if I found a letter on the side walk would I pick it up. I said "no".
Why would she ask me that? There are any number of reasons I would say no and also perhaps one reason she asked that. Was it even useful to the visit? Sounds suspicious and a waste of my time.
I was on disabling medication for a time when the following happened. I am no longer on that medicine that caused the symptoms I will describe in this testimony:
I was advised to see a DSHS state appointed doctor who said they were acting on behalf of the Federal government for social security disability claims. My lawyer indicated that if I did not see that doctor of theirs they would simply deny my claim. I had a letter from my doctor and it said I could not maintain employment and was disabled or something to that effect.
I was to see a doctor and arrived at the appointment. There was some doctor switching by the state in letters to me. Also the business building I saw them at was not the same profession, if I remember correctly, of that doctor. And that was not really suspicious. I was told by people that it was a cognitive test. They were going to assess my disability level.
I made an intelligent list as directed to state dates and other information about "dizzy hallucinating" spells that I knew were disabling. They would be traumatic and also exhausting and would cause me to be forced to pass out in bed. I would almost always go unconscious and later recover. And those spells would last for hours. And happen around mid day. I realized that it would happen at work if I attempted to try and work for an employer. At the end of the meeting the doctor asked me to follow a "command". She asked me to pick up that list I made which was on the table next me which she refused to review. And told me to do something to it I don't recall and also place it in my bag. And then said the meeting was over.
Does that sound equal in rights between doctor and patient to anyone reading that statement I made and what evil is that in your opinion? "Commands" not reviewing evidence for a claim. And later they denied my claim in court and that was a judge reviewing the evidence pertaining to my claim.
The other suspicious behavior from the doctor was prior to the end when she asked something to the effect of if I found a letter on the side walk would I pick it up. I said "no".
Why would she ask me that? There are any number of reasons I would say no and also perhaps one reason she asked that. Was it even useful to the visit? Sounds suspicious and a waste of my time.
