Being charismatic is not the same as being Pentecost.
CoreIssue: "I've studied the Azusa Street! So-called revival."
No, you haven't even watched the posted documentary. If you had, the biased screed you've gleaned from ghastly Fundamentalist sources would be corrected.
"CpreIssue: "The chief attendance were spiritists, mystics and other non-Christian beliefs and practices.
It was not a Christian revival."
If you were honest enough to watch the video, you would know that William Seymour urged attendees not to go out and talk to outsiders about speaking in tongues, but rather to go out and witness to the saving power of the Gospel of Jesus Christ! And you would realize the major role played by Baptists in that revival.
JcoreIssue: "Just look at what we got from it: word of faith, name it and claim it, health wealth and prosperity and other cult groups."
On the contrary, :what we got from it" is the greatest spiritual fruit in world history--600 million Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians. True, the revival didn't just peter out; what killed the revival was doctrinal bickering, some of it heretical. But the revival also restored the Holy Spirit to His essential role in the Church. Consider what killed the great Welsh Revival. Self-righteous evangelical pastors criticized Evan Roberts for allowing occasional excesses of the flesh. Being emotionally unstable, he could not handle this unfair criticism, and so, he withdrew from society to live in isolation. What would be most shocking in both the Welsh and Azusa Street Revivals would be if Satan didn't try to disrupt, sabotage, and counterfeit 2 of the greatest moves of the Spirit in Christin history. All--yes, all sinners, were welcome and the services were unplanned and unstructured because they were led by the Spirit. critics like you are unwittingly in danger of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit.