What Does Tweet Condemnation Do?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Mayflower

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2018
7,820
11,768
113
Bluffton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What does a condemnation resolution do to Trump. What does this mean?
 

Mayflower

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2018
7,820
11,768
113
Bluffton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ridiculous. I may not agree with his tweet finger as president, but it is called freedom of speech. It is unconstitutional to condemn a president over something posted on social media. If the president, why not anyone in America? Are we getting to the point where we are going to have to be afraid of what we say and how it offends someone?

Because if it comes to that point, I will not be silent if I see something wrong.
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
What does a condemnation resolution do to Trump. What does this mean?
This is just MORE NONSENSE from the feckless and shiftless Democrats who have absolutely nothing to offer America. But they still want political power and hope to bamboozle the unsuspecting voters into voting for them.

What Mr. Trump has done is compel the Democrats to either condemn all these radical socialists, Communists, anarchists, black racists, and Jew-haters, or join hands with them and show the world how utterly depraved the Democrats have become.

What Mr. Trump should have already done is brought charges of sedition and treason against a whole host of Democrats, who should have already been behind bars. And because this did not happen, all the reptiles have come out of hiding.

Personally, the President would be further ahead by making full use of the Oval Office, and addressing the nation over and over again about the attack on America from within.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayflower

quietthinker

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2018
11,557
7,585
113
FNQ
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Ridiculous. I may not agree with his tweet finger as president, but it is called freedom of speech. It is unconstitutional to condemn a president over something posted on social media. If the president, why not anyone in America? Are we getting to the point where we are going to have to be afraid of what we say and how it offends someone?

Because if it comes to that point, I will not be silent if I see something wrong.
Consider the issues surrounding Julian Assange re freedom of speech.
 

quietthinker

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2018
11,557
7,585
113
FNQ
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Unsure who that is. I'll have to look that up.
The founder of Wikileaks. He's the guy who exposed murderous plots of the US military apart from other things. Now they want his guts for garters. Currently He's in an English prison after being holed up in the Ecuardorian Embassy in London seeking asylum for years.
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
The founder of Wikileaks. He's the guy who exposed murderous plots of the US military apart from other things. Now they want his guts for garters. Currently He's in an English prison after being holed up in the Ecuardorian Embassy in London seeking asylum for years.
A lot of people condemn Julian Assange, but he did a great service at a time when it was needed. Unfortunately, the general public did not take the time to see how well he had exposed the inner rot within the system by showing the actual emails that went back and forth. They compare him to Snowdon, who was indeed a traitor since he betrayed his trust and publicized Top Secret information.
 

quietthinker

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2018
11,557
7,585
113
FNQ
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
A lot of people condemn Julian Assange, but he did a great service at a time when it was needed. Unfortunately, the general public did not take the time to see how well he had exposed the inner rot within the system by showing the actual emails that went back and forth. They compare him to Snowdon, who was indeed a traitor since he betrayed his trust and publicized Top Secret information.
when murder is top secret is it justified to keep it hidden?
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
when murder is top secret is it justified to keep it hidden?
When you take an oath of office (including the necessity to maintain top secret government documents) and you betray that oath, that makes you a traitor. Particularly when the information is passed on to the enemy. And traitors used to be put before a firing squad. But treason has been expunged from the English language.
 

quietthinker

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2018
11,557
7,585
113
FNQ
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
When you take an oath of office (including the necessity to maintain top secret government documents) and you betray that oath, that makes you a traitor. Particularly when the information is passed on to the enemy. And traitors used to be put before a firing squad. But treason has been expunged from the English language.
Murder by its very nature is illegal...Murder kept secret is never justified..... Would the US Government demand murderers are justified?? No doubt they do, as we have seen..... Is that the type of Government you would support while condemning those who don't who have taken the oath trusting the promises and integrity of their rulers?

The chances are you have promised to stick by your wife; you have made promises. Do those promises stand if she sleeps with other men secretly? Weren't those promises made on the understanding that both of you will have integrity and be faithful?
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Murder by its very nature is illegal...Murder kept secret is never justified.....
Murder by definition is a private matter. Execution by the state or the death of soldiers in warfare is not murder. So I don't know what you are talking about, unless it was all the murders committed by the Clintons for which they were never brought to justice. In any event it has nothing to do with the issue of maintaining Top Secret information in total secrecy.