No name is removed from the Book of Life, but many will have never been there, and for this reason they will not be found written in the book of life, which is the precise wording of Revelation 20:15 ~ "if anyone’s name (is) not found written in the book of life, he (will be) thrown into the lake of fire." There is nothing there about any "removal," only that they are not found.
Only those found? So you accept limited Atonement, and God was not capable? Or God decided not to provide universal Atonement?
You are missing the point. God can remove a name at the GWT Judgment, if that is the will of that person. But God will not remove a name if that person accepts the first resurrection as a means to escape the LOF.
So which is it, because it cannot be both? All are resurrected, or all were never placed in the Lamb's book of life? Daniel 12:1-2
"and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt."
So every one found in the Lamb's book of life will be delivered. All the dead does not mean they all were left out. At the opening of the 7th Seal, names will start to be removed.
You can claim that Daniel was being symbolic and then add your opinion and call it good. Your opinion cannot be wrong since taking these words literally would be wrong, but your opinion is the symbolism Daniel was aiming at.
Look again: the verse does not say all of them that sleep in the dust, it says many of them. Then it says some of the many, not all of the all will have eternal life, some of the many not all of the all will have eternal contempt. So this cannot be the one time ultimate judgment for every human ever conceived.
In Revelation chapter 20 it says that three places give up their dead: the sea, the grave, and death. So what is the closest thing Daniel is calling the dust in that list? If they are sleeping in the dust, that would be considered dead and in the grave, no?
But waking from sleep is not necessarily a first resurrection. Because I have pointed out that Lazarus received the first resurrection when he walked out of that tomb, a permanent incorruptible physical body, but you all disagreed. So at the end coming out of the dust is not a resurrection at all, to you, because it is no more than what you point out about Lazarus and not a resurrection. You claim Lazarus went back to sleep. So then these at the GWT Judgment event are only awake long enough; not resurrected, to decide if they want to be some of those who remain in the Lamb's book of life, or do they want to keep rejecting redemption, and be removed from the Lamb's book of Life.
Because many have already been removed and tossed into the LOF over 1,000 years before Daniel sees some have eternal life and some remain eternally dead.
While I don't agree with your opinion about Lazarus, I do agree that what you claim about Lazarus would apply to some at the GWT Judgment, because all those there just woke up, but are not resurrected like Lazarus was 1994 years ago from today.
Even John does not say:
"But all the rest of the dead will all live again after the thousand years are finished. They are guaranteed the first resurrection."
John says:
"But the rest of the dead
lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection."
That is a negative connotation that means they have a chance, but probably won't. Living again is the first resurrection. Some will live again as Daniel pointed out. Others will have eternal contempt, the second death.
And another vast majority will have already received the first resurrection, even at the moment Jesus died on the Cross.
Daniel saw the end, but that does not rule out all those who already had a first, physical resurrection. Nor does it rule out that many had already been judged, removed from the Lamb's book of life and tossed into the LOF over 1,000 years earlier. Because John specifically points out the rest of the dead keep waiting for that final judgment, while some were standing before thrones and already granted the first, physical resurrection.
And the reason why there is a first and second was given in John 3, when Jesus explained the first was physical and the second was spiritual. The first birth, physical. The second birth spiritual. The first death, physical. The second death spiritual. And the first resurrection, is physical. And a second resurrection is never implied nor pointed out any where in Scripture.
The GWT Judgment event is not a second resurrection point. And it is implied that some of the dead standing there, may receive the first, physical resurrection, to eternal life. Those who are the dead emptied out of sheol, because the grave and first, physical death is related to dust and sleeping in Scripture. Now Death on the other hand relates to a place where people wait after physically dying, after being removed from the Lamb's book of life. Those alive on the earth who receive the mark have been removed from the Lamb's book of life at the moment they are marked. When they physically die remain in Death. But some who stand in Judgment are physically cast into the LOF without ever physically dying first. Having a body does not mean one is physically resurrected, because one body is still death and corruption, and the first resurrection body is permanent and incorruptible. They are physically dead, but awake, not resurrected.