Once again, you completely just ignore God's perfection, unwavering will, glory, mercy, etc.
No, again, that's not the issue. This is your enduring focus, refusing to acknowledge the thing I'm saying.
Your view is that of all the spirits, there is one that is better than the rest in choices, behavior, all that spirits do, that we call "God" for this reason, yet is still in fact one of many, and any of them could be "God" by virtue of being the most "Godlike", as that identification is based on behavior, not being.
My view is that there is a Spirit Who created all others, and remains infinitely transcendent over all others.
I'm not ignoring God's perfection, but I'm saying that's not what makes Him God, it's because He is God.
What to use for an analogy?
Like saying, all people are the same sex, only, the most masculine we call man, and the most feminine we call woman. But in fact, being a man is something different then being a woman. There is a biological difference that results in the behavioral/visible differences. Just like being the Creator God is different from being Created Man.
Your objection amounts to saying, "You are ignoring the huge difference between masculinity and femininity," while I'm saying, "There is an ontological difference between men and women."
Which again leads us to the LDS teaching,
"As man is, God was, and as God is, man may become." True? Or False? You keep avoiding answering this question.
Maybe you realize how it would sound to others, so you won't say.
Much love!