Well, we have to be careful in our reading and studying the King James Bible. We cannot always enforce our modern English upon our reading of it. There are archaic words in the King James Bible that we have to properly understand (Seeing it was written in 1600’s English). For example: The word conversation in 2 Peter 3:11 is an archaic English word....
You posted "
One needs grace first before they can obey or do a work."
You are espousing a teaching of man here and not a teaching of Christ.
No verse says one must be given grace before one is able to obey. The Bible shows the exact opposite in that one must first obey before receiving grace. No verse says the disobedient, unrighteous, wicked
UNconditionally receive grace then some time later they can obey. This idea of yours would have God being culpable for the disobedient and showing respect of persons as to whom God gives grace and withholds grace.
OBEDIENCE is the basis as to who receives grace and who will not. As far back as the OT, God's predetermined course of action is to show mercy to the obedient and no mercy for the disobedient, Jer 18:8-10. Pharaoh disobeyed God = no mercy. King of Nineveh obeyed = God showed mercy.
1) Noah built the ark (obedience) >>>>>>>> >>>> saved from flood (grace)
2) Naaman dipped 7 times (obedience)>>>>>>>>> healed of disease (grace)
3) Israel march around Jericho (obedience) >>>>>> received city (grace)
In the NT, it those who obey that receive grace:
Rom 6:16 ----obedience (obey) >>>>>>>>>>> unto righteousness/saved (grace)
Jn 3:3,5----- born again (obedience) >>>>>>>> enter the kingdom/saved (grace)
Matt 7:21----do the will of God (obedience) >>>> enter the kingdom/saved (grace)
Mk 16:16---believe & baptized (obedience) >>>> saved (grace)
Jn 3:16 -----believeth (obedience) >>>>>>>>> saved
Acts 2:38 ---repent & baptized >>>>>>>>>>>> remission of sins/saved (grace)
Rom 10:9---confess w/mouth (obedience) >>>>> saved (grace)
Rom 6:17-18--obeyed from heart (obedience) >>> justified (grace)
I can cite many more verses but these should suffice to prove that receiving grace is
NOT UNconditional but is
100% totally conditional upon obedience to the will of God.
Therefore there is
not one verse in the NT that teaches salvation apart from obedience:
-- obedience is not a work of merit. In all the examples I cited above, both OT and NT examples, obedience is
never called a work of merit.
-- Eph 2:8; Rom 4:3-5; Tts 3:5 eliminate works of merit works of the OT law but no verse eliminate obedience. Again,
NO VERSE teaches the disobedient/wicked/unrighteous UNconditionally receive grace.
============================================
You posted about calling on the name of the Lord.
"
Calling on the name of the Lord" does
NOT mean I can just call out to Christ to save me while I disobey Christ's will by doing nothing. Lk 6:46
why call ye Me Lord, Lord and DO NOT the things which I say? It is the wise man that "heareth
AND DOETH" and it is the foolish man that heareth and
doeth NOT, (Mt 7:24ff). Therefore calling on the name of the Lord means to do what the Lord says to do. Peter quoted Joel's prophecy in Acts 2:21 and that prophecy fulfilled in v38:
Call upon the name of the Lord >>>>>>>>>>>> saved
repent and be baptized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saved/remission of sins
Paul/Saul in Acts 22:16 was calling upon the name of the Lord when he arose and was baptized.
Acts 2:41
"
Then they that gladly received his word were baptized.."
This means those who rejected Peter's gospel words rejected baptism. The logical conclusion is rejecting water baptism is rejecting Christ's gospel, being water baptized is accepting Christ's gospel.
2 Thess 1:8
"
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:"
--the logical implication of this verse is that it
requires one to OBEY to not be in flaming fire...another death knell to Luther's faith onlyism.
--one therefore
MUST '
obey the gospel of Christ' to not be in flaming fire.
--the gospel is the death, burial and resurrection of Christ (1 Cor 15:1-4)
--in water baptism (Rom 6) one dies to sin, the old man of sin DIES, one is BURIED in a watery grave from which one is "raised up from", hence there is a death burial and resurrection (obeying the gospel) in water baptism. This death burial and resurrection does not take place anywhere in the NT with belief only or saying a sinner's prayer nor some with "spirit" baptism.
===============================================
John 1:12
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
You were unable to explain the plain verse away. The verse in no way says 'believe only and thou are a son of God' for belief
apart from repentance, confession and baptism
cannot save, (Lk 13:3; Mt 10:32-33; Mk 16:16). Belief alone cannot save the impenitent, cannot save those who will not confess Christ nor save those who reject the Gospel of Christ by not being water baptized (Acts 2:41). Believing gives one the power to repent, confess and be baptized for for unbelief prevents the unbeliever/atheist from repenting, confessing Christ and being water baptized for remission of sins.
The word "become" (
ginomai) means
:
--to come into existence,
--to become, i.e. to come to pass
Being a child of God comes to pass, comes into existence not until one first believes then uses the power of belief to repent, confess and be baptized. .......'
as many as received (past tense - believed)
Him ....those who ALREADY believe now have the power to become (using the power belief gives to repent confess be baptized) the son of God. Note the verse is speaking of those who already (past tense) believe but can 'become',
not yet come to pass in being sons of God but now possess the power belief gives in order to become sons of God.
No matter how hard you may try, you can
NEVER have an impenitent person who refused to confess Christ and refuses to obey the gospel of Christ (2 Thess 1:8) a son of God.
=====================================================
Acts 10, Cornelius being baptized with the HS had nothing to do with his perosonal salvation. In giving Peter and vision that Gentiles were "clean" and baptizing Cornelius with the HS, God was using Cornelius as a medium to prove to the Jews the Gentiles were in fact clean and salvation was also to go to them, salvation was not just for the Jew. After the Lord baptized Cornelius with the HS, Peter did NOT says "Cornelius being baptized with the HS proves he is saved so he does not have to be water baptized". instead Peter COMMANDED water baptism proving Cornelius was not saved, something was lacking in his being saved and that was being water baptized in the name of the Lord for remission of sins. The fact water baptism is commanded makes it necessary to salvation if for no other reason.
Again, from Acts 2:41 being water baptized is receiving the gospel word and rejecting water baptism is rejecting the gospel word. Therefore AFTER Cornelius was water baptized it is said Acts 11:1 "
And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God." It only thru water baptism God's word is received, NOT by being baptized with the HS.