The Godly Heresy of Sinless Perfectionism

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So you didn't look at the link. I did. It is extensive so I did not look at all of it. From what I looked at some of the points are valid and some are not. Obvious bias. That is the thing with people when they have an axe to grind. They see what they want even when there is no arguing the facts presented.
I don’t agree with everything on the site but some of it is valid. You can nitpick anything like he did the NKJV but some of the info on that site is worth looking into, some of it is nitpicking.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Sure it does. For one understanding the Greek language is subject to context and grammar. The context prior to and after verse eight speaks of sinlessness. It says God is light and in Him is no darkness in verse 5. And then goes on to say that if we claim fellowship with Him and should walk in darkness we lie and do not the truth. But if we walk in the light as He is, we are in fellowship and the blood of Jesus cleanses us of all sin. Then in respect to being cleansed from all sin it states if we say we have no sin in verse 8. Besides sin being a noun, a state of being here and not a verb, an action. If verse 8 was implying that we would always be sinning or have sin then Jesus' blood would not actual cleanse us from ALL sin and verse 7 would be a lie. As well as verse 9 were it states if we confess our sins He will cleanse us from all unrighteousness. Even further verse 2:1 would make no sense There we are counseled not to sin. If it weren't possible why counsel it? And then in 2:1 it states if we do we have an advocate. It doesn't say when we do, it says if. As well as verse 10 saying sinned not sinning. Past tense not present. Which incidentally is the first time in this context sin is a verb.




1John 1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

1John 1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:
1John 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
1John 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1John 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
1John 2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
Good argument. But 1 John 2:1 says if we sin we have an advocate so it looks like stumbling was anticipated.
 
Last edited:

HIM

Active Member
Apr 18, 2021
239
93
28
58
Ashland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don’t agree with everything on the site but some of it is valid. You can nitpick anything like he did the NKJV but some of the info on that site is worth looking into, some of it is nitpicking.
And some of it is unsubstantiated on both corridors.
 
Last edited:

HIM

Active Member
Apr 18, 2021
239
93
28
58
Ashland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Good argument. But 1 John 2:1 says if we sin we have an advocate so it looks like stumbling was anticipated.
Anticipated? The grammar only implies a possibility. Anticipated doesn’t fit the context. Especially after counseling not to.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Anticipated? The grammar only implies a possibility. Anticipated doesn’t fit the context. Especially after counseling not to.
A remedy was provided so it must have been an expectation. Weren’t there sin offerings in Old Testament times? It seems it has always been an expectation .
Unchecked Copy Box
Lev 4:3 - If the priest that is anointed do sin according to the sin of the people;then let him bring for his sin, which he hath sinned, a young bullock without blemish unto the LORD for a sin offering
 
Last edited:

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
To all:

John says to ”sin not.” (1 John 2:1). Jesus says to ”sin no more” (John 5:14) (John 8:11). It’s not possible to ”sin NOT” or “sin NO MORE” as instructed in God’s Word if the Bible did not teach such truths. Sure, there is grace if one stumbles (Psalms 51), and or even struggles with sin seeking to overcome it (Parable of the Prodigal Son and James 5:19-20), but there is no grace for those who believe they must sin again (as a part of being a slave to sin in this life) with the thinking they are saved.

The Bible makes it clear that we are to overcome sin in this life (See again 1 Peter 4:1-2, 2 Corinthians 7:1, and Galatians 5:24).

The Bible clearly warns against a group of believers in whom Jesus did not know because they worked lawlessness or iniquity (Matthew 7:22-23) (Luke 13:27). We are told to STRIVE to enter the straight gate (Luke 13:24). This narrow way or straight gate again is in context to believers because these types said…

#1. “Lord, Lord, open unto us;” (Calling Jesus Lord - indicating they are a believer in Jesus).
#2. ”We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets.” (Indicating they were in the company of Jesus and thought they were in favor with Him).

Sin is what kept them out. Paul even says, “Be not deceived:” (1 Corinthians 6:9).
What could the believers in Corinth be deceived about?
Paul says, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?” (1 Corinthians 6:9).

Paul continues: “Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Corinthians 6:9-11).

So Paul is saying if we are still partaking of these kinds of sins after we have been saved, we will not inherit the Kingdom of God.
Meaning, we will not be saved. This applies to me, you, and everyone else on the planet. I could not make it into the Kingdom if don’t die in a righteous state of living holy. The only escape is by Jesus Christ and that is by seeking forgiveness with Him (1 John 1:9) (1 John 2:1), and in being sanctified by the washing of the water of the Word so that Christ might present to Himself a church that is holy and without blemish (Ephesians 5:25-27).

But Christians today want to justify sin. This is due to the falling away. A falling away from God’s Word.

Textual Criticism was something that was in smaller numbers before the 1970’s. Generally liberals and heretics used something else besides the King James Bible. Before Modern Textual Criticism fully took hold of the church in great numbers with the coming out of the NIV in the 1970’s, many believers in the English speaking world just believed their Bible in English (KJB) as the very words of God.

King James Bible believers in history:

The General Baptists of England published the "Orthodox Creed" In 1678. It says, "And by the holy Scriptures we understand the canonical books of the Old and New Testament, AS THEY ARE NOW TRANSLATED INTO OUR ENGLISH MOTHER TONGUE, of which there hath NEVER been any doubt of their verity, and authority, in the protestant churches of Christ to this day." They then list the books of the Old and New Testament and then say, "All which are given by the inspiration of God, to be the Rule of faith and life."

Taken from the Association of Baptists 25th meeting 1830

We the church of Jesus Christ being regularly baptised upon the profession of our faith in Christ are convinced the concessive of associate churches. WE BELIEVE THAT THE SCRIPTURES OF THE OLD AND THE NEW TESTAMENTS AS TRANSLATED BY THE AUTHORITY OF KING JAMES TO BE THE WORDS OF GOD AND IS THE ONLY TRUE RULE OF FAITH AND PRACTICE.

1857: “The general excellence of the English Version being admitted, ITS PERFECTION ASSUMED, AND THEREFORE ALL PRECEDING AND SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS MUST BE UNWORTHY OF NOTICE; nay, even the original text need not be consulted...” (Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, The English Bible, and Our Duty with Regard to It, 1857; 1871).

1882: “I unhesitatingly say, that the same Holy Ghost who gave inspiration to the Apostles to write out the New Testament, presided over and inspired those men in the translation and bringing out of the entire Bible in the English language. And I also say, that no version since, brought out in the English language, has the Divine sanction...Now, why would God cause at this age and in these trying times, versions in the same language to be brought out, to conflict...?...He would not...I FURTHERMORE SAY, THAT THE KING JAMES' TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE IS THE ONLY DIVINELY INSPIRED...” (William Washington Simkins, The English Version of the New Testament, Compared with King James' Translation, 1882).

There are more with citations of things like this you can discover at the following source link.

Source:
KJB believers in history - BrandPlucked (Will Kinney)

Over the years, I had Christians tell me that I worship the KJB because I believe it is the perfect Word of God and or because I revere it to be the very words of God.

Psalms 119:140 says:
”Thy word is very pure: therefore thy servant loveth it.”

Loving God’s Word today has led others to say that I am into idolatry. But idolatry is bowing down to an object as if it was the entirety of God Himself. The Bible is merely the thoughts and or the mind of God in His desiring us to have faith in Him and to follow His will by faith (and not our own will like trying to defend sin by using 1 John 1:8, and Romans 7:14-24 out of context). Anyone can rip a verse or passage out of context to the chapter or the surrounding chapters.

We also have to realize we are in the last days. I believe the falling away spoken of by the apostle Paul has happened. Many in the church no longer believe in a perfect Bible as their final authority. Even those who do believe in a perfect Bible believe they can sin and still be saved. Times have truly gotten darker. Just as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be at the coming of the Son of Man. I believe we are nearing that day closer and closer. For could it be that the Antichrist could be among us today?

Check out this video here:


If so, get yourself ready with the LORD while there is still time. Don’t play games with your soul and justify sin and say how you must sin again as per a wrong interpretation on 1 John 1:8, and Romans 7:14-24 by the church at large. Jesus said narrow is the way that leads unto life and FEW be there that find it. Luke 13 makes this narrow way or straight gate out to be amongst the sphere of Christianity. Do not be deceived. The unrighteous will not inherit the kIngdom of God. Don’t justify sin like many believers today do. They are not going to make it into the Kingdom of God if they do so. They will be shocked at the Judgment that they were wrong for need heeding the Word of God with their defense of sin.
 
Last edited:

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is no such thing as a perfect bible. I'm not sure but are you saying the AKJV is perfect?
If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines?
Modern Translations actually change doctrine for the worse and not for the better.
 

stormymonday

Member
Dec 25, 2022
83
17
8
concord
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines?
Modern Translations actually change doctrine for the worse and not for the better.
That makes no sense. The bible you believe that is perfect - is the AKJV, correct? So why is it that even people who agree with you about its PERFECTION all have differing views/doctrines?

When Christians make that assertion, it opens up a can of worms they cannot close. It doesn't take an Atheist to wipe the floor with that outrageous claim. There's no such thing as a perfect translation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLT63

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That makes no sense. The bible you believe that is perfect - is the AKJV, correct? So why is it that even people who agree with you about its PERFECTION all have differing views/doctrines?

When Christians make that assertion, it opens up a can of worms they cannot close. It doesn't take an Atheist to wipe the floor with that outrageous claim. There's no such thing as a perfect translation.
First, you didn’t answer my question.

Second, I cannot force you to see the truth and I imagine it is just as silly in your mind to believe God has preserved His Word today in a 1600’s English Bible. I imagine you think it is preposterous. But think. How many people today do you think the resurrection is just as equally preposterous.

Three, start reading in my post #820 on after. It will hopefully help explain to you where I am coming from.
 

stormymonday

Member
Dec 25, 2022
83
17
8
concord
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
First, you didn’t answer my question.

Second, I cannot force you to see the truth and I imagine it is just as silly in your mind to believe God has preserved His Word today in a 1600’s English Bible. I imagine you think it is preposterous. But think. How many people today do you think the resurrection is just as equally preposterous.

Three, start reading in my post #820 on after. It will hopefully help explain to you where I am coming from.
I did answer the question, "If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines?"

You just didn't like the answer that there's so much disagreement among people who believe in a perfect bible that that alone proves there's no such thing.

I'm not going to spoon-feed the reasons why there isn't a perfect translation - you should already know.

People like you who claim a translation is error free and claims they have the truth makes a fool out of Christianity.

You want me to debunk your perfect bible? Or should I let an Atheist do it?

Even IF we did have an error free bible - the Protestants would still disagree on a zillion things.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
First, you didn’t answer my question.

Second, I cannot force you to see the truth and I imagine it is just as silly in your mind to believe God has preserved His Word today in a 1600’s English Bible. I imagine you think it is preposterous. But think. How many people today do you think the resurrection is just as equally preposterous.

Three, start reading in my post #820 on after. It will hopefully help explain to you where I am coming from.
Why did he pick the 1600s? Why didn’t we have a perfect Bible before then? Why weren’t the original manuscripts saved forever so there would be no confusion, no question?
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I did answer the question, "If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines?"

It really is not a true answer to solving the problem. How do you know you have correct doctrines without a perfect Bible? Your response would be like saying the answer to 2 + 2 = 5. It’s a response but it is not a true answer or solution. Your response is illogical and an evasion of the truth.

You just didn't like the answer that there's so much disagreement among people who believe in a perfect bible that that alone proves there's no such thing.
That is highly illogical. For example: There is a lot of disagreement over biblical Christianity. That does not invalidate it. So your point here is flawed. It’s not a real answer that solves the problem of the question.


I'm not going to spoon-feed the reasons why there isn't a perfect translation - you should already know.
I am not new to this kind of discussion. I have been discussing it with other believers for 11 years. There are many things on the Bible issue here that you are simply not aware of. If you only knew what I did, you would not believe the way you currently do.


People like you who claim a translation is error free and claims they have the truth makes a fool out of Christianity.

You want me to debunk your perfect bible? Or should I let an Atheist do it?
How long have you been a Christian? To say that an atheist can defend a certain aspect of the Bible is ignorance. Atheists have no spiritual understanding to even understand God’s Word let alone are they able to show a truth that you think defends your viewpoint on the Bible.


Even IF we did have an error free bible - the Protestants would still disagree on a zillion things.
Right. I agree with you on this. I am not a fan of Protestantism, either. I just believe the Bible alone + the Anointing to Understand It.
 
Last edited:

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why did he pick the 1600s? Why didn’t we have a perfect Bible before then? Why weren’t the original manuscripts saved forever so there would be no confusion, no question?
There is a symbiotic relationship between the Living Word (Jesus) and the Communicated Word (the Scriptures or the Holy Bible).

Here are 41 verses:


So if it took approximately 4,000 years for the Word to be made flesh and to be present among us humans (Since Adam was created on day six) then why cannot it take appx. 2,000 years for the Communicated Word (the Holy Bible) to arrive for the common man or for the Communicated Word to arrive so that many can have access to it?
 
Last edited:

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is a symbiotic relationship between the Living Word (Jesus) and the Communicated Word (the Scriptures or the Holy Bible).

Here are 41 verses:


So if it took approximately 4,000 years for the Word to be made flesh and to be present among us humans (Since Adam was created on day six) then why cannot it take appx. 2,000 years for the Communicated Word (the Holy Bible) to arrive for the common man or for the Communicated Word to arrive so that many can have access to it?
I have to give it to you, you worked YEC in there with sinless perfection and King James Only. Not that I believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old but 6,000 years seems a little short.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
3,272
1,865
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It really is not a true answer to solving the problem. How do you know you have correct doctrines without a perfect Bible? Your response would be like saying the answer to 2 + 2 = 5. It’s a response but it is not a true answer or solution. Your response is illogical and an evasion of the truth.


That is highly illogical. For example: There is a lot of disagreement over biblical Christianity. That does not invalidate it. So your point here is flawed. It’s not a real answer that solves the problem of the question.



I am not new to this kind of discussion. I have been discussing it with other believers for 11 years. There are many things on the Bible issue here that you are simply not aware of. If you only knew what I did, you would not believe the way you currently do.



How long have you been a Christian? To say that an atheist can defend a certain aspect of the Bible is ignorance. Atheists have no spiritual understanding to even understand God’s Word let alone are they able to show a truth that you think defends your viewpoint on the Bible.



Right. I agree with you on this. I am not a fan of Protestantism, either. I just believe the Bible alone + the Anointing to Understand It.
I doubt that stormyMonday believes in sola scriptura
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
There is a symbiotic relationship between the Living Word (Jesus) and the Communicated Word (the Scriptures or the Holy Bible).

Here are 41 verses:


So if it took approximately 4,000 years for the Word to be made flesh and to be present among us humans (Since Adam was created on day six) then why cannot it take appx. 2,000 years for the Communicated Word (the Holy Bible) to arrive for the common man or for the Communicated Word to arrive so that many can have access to it?
the problem with the link being that they also believe Bible = Word, when the Bible Itself makes plain that they are not the same...
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I have to give it to you, you worked YEC in there



with sinless perfection



and King James Only.
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
the problem with the link being that they also believe Bible = Word, when the Bible Itself makes plain that they are not the same...
Not true. Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word of God.

Matthew 4:4 is not talking about multiple versions of Jesus.
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I doubt that stormyMonday believes in sola scriptura
If he is Catholic that makes sense he is against the KJB.

Here is one of the Catholic books. Notice which version they don’t want you to read.

full