So how would you reply to a video like this?
While Gene Kim could be a lot more loving in his approach (and I do not agree with his view of Soteriology), he does make some really good points that does not really fit with the Textual Critic viewpoint.
I do disagree also with Gene Kim’s view on all Modern bibles being of no use or benefit to the Christian life (Seeing he thinks corruptions means the whole of the translation is of no value or use). But he does make a good case for at least us having one Bible or one standard of God’s Word in this particular video.
Side Note:
To give further support of how we can use imperfect Modern Bibles:
Well, to give an analogy of how one can use an imperfect Bible, some foods can be eaten if you pick out the bad spoiled parts.
You just have to be really careful to not eat the spoiled parts, though. Even the the devil and unbelieving Jews were used as a part of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Which was the salvation of all of mankind). So I believe we can use Modern bibles unlike Dr. Gene Kim believes. I just don’t believe Modern bibles can be my final word of authority like the KJB, though (Because they change doctrines). But Modern bibles in my view are a necessity because there are many confusing archaic words in the KJB.