This is more of that 'double-gospel' doctrine of men like C.R. Stam that Richard is on. It's a false doctrine that holds only to Paul's Epistles as being for the Gentiles.
Here's a pretty good link if you want to understand the docrine of where those like Richard is coming from:
http://cicministry.o...ry/issue108.htm
Here's a tidbit...
"Are the Teachings of Jesus Binding on the Church?
Hyperdispensationalists claim that Jesus presented to the Jews an offer of a kingdom that He would have instituted during the first advent—had they accepted. They further teach that the twelve apostles continued this offer after Jesus' resurrection and ascension. It was eventually withdrawn, they say, after it was clear that the Jews were not going to accept the offer. Hyperdispensationalist C. R. Stam claims the offer was withdrawn at the end of Acts: "The offer of the kingdom, made at Pentecost, was not officially withdrawn until Acts 28:28. After that time, Jews and Gentiles alike are offered salvation by grace.
Hyperdispenstionalists claim that Jesus' teachings were the terms that would have been in effect had the Jews accepted the offer of the kingdom. Those terms were still valid as long as the offer was valid. After that they have no importance to the church and are not binding.
They do not claim the gospels are not canonical, but that the teachings therein are not authoritative for the church unless they contain some principles that would transcend any given dispensation, much like we would use Leviticus. Hyperdispensationalists believe that the only revelation binding on the church is that which was given to Paul.
They also have a very different idea about the church itself. For example, when Jesus said, "On this rock I will build My church," he supposedly was not speaking of the church (i.e., the body of Christ) but a Jewish "church" that only existed for a while until the middle of Acts. This means that the church we are in is not what Jesus called "My church."
For example, Stam claims that we could easily solve the problem of Rome claiming Peter as the first pope if we were to realize that the church Jesus referred to as "My church" in Matthew 16:18 does not now exist on earth:" (Bob DeWaay per that above link).
In more simple terms, the doctrine of hyper-dispensationalism (from some of Bullinger's concepts, a 19th century Christian scholar), believes there are TWO Gospels, one for Jews and another one for Gentiles. It is a direct attempt to divide Christ's True Church of both believing Israelites and believing Gentiles as one body (a specific Church doctrine that Apostle Paul himself taught).
Paul taught the same Gospel which all of Christ's Apostles taught, with one difference. Paul was specifically chosen by our Lord Jesus to take His Gospel of the Kingdom to the Gentiles (Acts 9:15).
Paul also... preached the Gospel of the Kingdom to the Gentiles (2 Thess.1:5; 1 Thess.2:12; Col.1:13; Eph.5:5; Acts 28:30-31, and many other NT examples in Paul's Epistles). Thus, the hyper-dispensationalist's doctrines are actually very easy to refute Scripture-wise.
Irregardless of when that false doctrine started, what could be its purpose, what kind of confusion can it produce?
For one, it causes division of Christ's many-membered Body, His Church here on earth.
Secondly and foremost, it's a setup to lead a believer away from many warnings and commands our Lord Jesus and His Apostles gave for His New Testament Church of today, and all the way leading up to the return of our Lord Jesus.
For the deeper Bible student, heeding even Paul's admonition to study all of God's Word, including the Old Testament as "ensamples" for us upon whom the end of the world is come (1 Cor.10), it means to NOT DO JUST WHAT PAUL HIMSELF TOLD US TO DO!
The hyper-dispensationalist doctrine as a whole, is to aid deceived Gentile believers into being more greatly deceived, simply by denying the majority of God's Truth in His Word as applying only to Israel, and not Gentiles also.
And apparently, that's exactly what a lot of believers want today, an easy doctrine to latch onto that tells them they don't need to study God's Word, but to just believe and that's it. Such false ideas align perfectly with Darby's rapturist ideas (which Bullinger believed by the way), and the 'Once Saved, Always Saved' idea of men.
The reality of that doctrine is the same kind of working by the workers of iniquity of old, especially those of the pagan priest castes of ancient history. They would hide the truth from the masses in order to GET POWER over them, to rule over them, steal their money, just like organized criminals. Our Lord Jesus warned us about the leaven traditions of men, as all the Apostles did, including Apostle Paul.
