Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Actually I don't but you have been too indoctrinated in your hatred of all things dispensational to see otherwise.You believe Darby&Scofield modernist revisionist dispensational delusionism.
Toss it into the dumpster.
I have bothered and I showed you and you ignore it. So, tell me what tense "WAS ESTABLISHED" is in?
Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, et al, pre-dated Roman Catholicism by well over a century. You lose.
He just keeps losing. Why he does he never tire of it?Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, et al, pre-dated Roman Catholicism by well over a century. You lose.
And in reality the acolyte is yourself, because the futurism of your dispensational futurism was fabricated by Jesuit Francisco Ribera in the counter-Reformation of the apostate papacy. You lose again.
Got any more gems for us?
Once again your reading skills fail you. It is not the covenant but the better promises that the covenant is founded on. The better promise is the blood of Jesus that establishes the covenant.
Well if any of your 1700 years of believer can point to a time or place and say here is where the covenant as written was fulfilled I am all ears. But the cites you made just say the same as you- the New Covenant is fulfilled. Here are the terms of the covenant, I am still waiting for you to point to when and where theyy were fulfilled as written:Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, et al, pre-dated Roman Catholicism by well over a century. You lose.
And in reality the acolyte is yourself, because the futurism of your dispensational futurism was fabricated by Jesuit Francisco Ribera in the counter-Reformation of the apostate papacy. You lose again.
Got any more gems for us?
The only thing you know about the RCC is its fabricated futurized fantasy antichrist of dispensationalism's delusions.
LOL. You can't have any worse reading skills than that, so it is your reading skills that have failed. As if the better promises that the covenant is found on aren't part of the new covenant itself? LOL. You will go to any length to twist scripture to make it say what you want it to say. That is very clear to me.
Hello? The blood of Jesus was shed long ago. So, how can you think that the new covenant is not established yet? Your reading skills have failed you terribly.
Except for Hebrews 8:6-7 which tells us that the new covenant was established long ago. You don't take that literally.
Good! Maybe you will finally understand. But, don't doubt when you ask (James 1:5-7).
You suck at pretending to know people. I was a catholic for 20 years and had gone to catholic grammar, high and a summer at seminary. I think my knowledge of Catholicism far outweighs your.The only thing you know about the RCC is its fabricated futurized fantasy antichrist of dispensationalism's delusions.
Got any example of any other what you call unfulfilled covenant in Scripture, half of which is dangling for over 2,000 years?
You're also awful quiet about post 217. What's the problem?
So you should be able to tell us all about Francisco Ribera.
You didn't, but that's no surprise, as you have no Scriptural rebuttal for it.
What a silly thing to say. Have you ever heard of the Internet? You know, it's the things that allows for us to be talking to each other. It has a lot of information on it. Not sure if you were aware. And that includes information on Catholicism, including from Catholics themselves. So, it's just nothing short of ludicrous to think that someone can't know Catholicism just as much as you do just because they were never Catholic.
clear like muddy water. I am still waiting for you to point to a time in history when the covenant went into effect.
Well I am waiting for you to tell me what Jer. 31:31-37 means as you say it does not mean what is written. I am also praying to discern what you mean as you do things not by natural reading and comprehension but spiritual meanings.
Don't know a Francisco Ribera. I know of a former priest named Francisco Rivera of chick tract fame who is a bitter man.So you should be able to tell us all about Francisco Ribera.
You didn't, but that's no surprise, as you have no Scriptural rebuttal for it.
Well as you accused me of not knowing Catholicism and I said you suck at knowing me this answer is asinine! I never implied you didn't know Catholicism, I was answering your accusation of me not knowing much.
You don't know the father of the futurism that deceives you? For shame.
You didn't because there's no rebuttal of Christ the Divine Intercessory Mediator of His Completely Fulfilled New Covenant.
You must not be reading my posts. It was the point in time when Jesus died on the cross. Is there anything hard to understand about this?
That is apparently what you think about Hebrews 8 to 10. You definitely seem to have all of those verses except for Hebrews 8:8-12 missing from your Bible.
Your reading comprehension skills are utterly horrible. I said no such thing. What I actually did say is that a person doesn't have to be a Catholic to know what Catholicism is about.
Have you lost your mind? You're speaking complete gibberish.
Give me quotes because I don't know what you're talking about. What I recall without looking it up right now is that you said you knew Catholicism far better than covenantee does and your evidence for that was that you used to be a Catholic for 20 years. I responded and said you don't have to be a Catholic to understand Catholicism because there is a lot of information available on the Internet about it, including from Catholics themselves.
Why should I bother when you don't accept it when I show you what Hebrews 8:6-7 means? You think "was established" means "will be established". How can I reason with such a person as you? Seems impossible.
