what you posted is incomplete you cut off some parts of my post. To prove what I wrote wrong?
It was irrelevant, because I had already acknowledged that Peter was an apostle BEFORE Paul
You wrote this n your first paragraph
Before Paul even came into the story, Jesus had already chosen Peter and the other apostles to go to all nations. After His resurrection, Jesus said, “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19–20). Then later, Jesus spoke directly to Peter in a very personal way, saying three times, “Feed My lambs… Tend My sheep… Feed My sheep” (John 21:15–17). That was Jesus’ way of restoring Peter after his denial, but it was also a command that reached beyond Israel. Jesus had already spoken of this earlier when He said, “And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd” (John 10:16). Those “other sheep” were the Gentiles, and this meant Peter’s task to tend and feed Christ’s sheep included them too.
Again, I had acknowledged Peter was an apostle before Paul, so you missed my point
Peter was not going in unto the Gentiles until that vision came to him
(In Chapter 10) and Paul would never have believed upon the the Lord Jesus Christ until that vision came to him and His being a chosen vessel unto him to the Gentiles
(in Chapter 9).
Regardless of what Jesus said to Peter, he was not understanding it
As Peter said to Cornelius in Chater 10
Acts 10:28
And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.( This was shown to Peter earlier in Acts Chapter 10 and Peter mentions this very incident in Acts 11:9)
This thing was not at all computing with Peter until God showed him, and it was no small thing with these either when they heard of it
Acts 11:1
And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God.
Acts 11:2
And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him,
Acts 11:3
Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.
Acts 11:4
But Peter rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and expounded it by order unto them, saying,
And then Peter begins at his vision that he had in Chapter 10 recalling that here in Acts 11
Acts 11:5
I was in the city of Joppa praying: and in a trance I saw a vision, A certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet,
let down from heaven by four corners; and it came even to me, (Acts 10:11) This had to happen three times.
Which had to do with the Gentiles, and which was said to him in both places
Acts 11:9
But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. (Acts 10:28)
Jesus said salvation was of the Jews (John 4:22)
We all know Peter was a Jew who walked with Jesus first even as Paul a Jew not among the original apostles
Paul quoting Isaiah 49:6 here saying the same were set to be a light to the Gentiles
Acts 13:47
For so hath the Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a light of the Gentiles,
that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth.
Here it is again;
Do not forget Paul a new convert did not preach immediately in acts 9 but rather started to peach to the gentiles in Acts 13 if I remember correctly.
I knew you would see it and not like it it is why I added this last phrase.
Its not a competition, we are just shown Paul was called a chosen vessel unto the Gentiles (in Acts chapter 9) which was before Peter even understood thats what he would have to do. So whether walked with Christ or not, Peter wasnt going in that direction without some additional guidance.
So when you wrote your next two paragraphs (I will copy paste these here
We see this become real in Acts chapter 10, when Peter received a vision from God. He saw a great sheet lowered from heaven filled with all kinds of animals, clean and unclean, and heard a voice say, “What God has cleansed you must not call common” (Acts 10:15). This vision confused him at first, but it was preparing him to meet Cornelius, a Gentile man who also had received a vision. An angel told Cornelius, “Now send men to Joppa, and call for Simon whose surname is Peter. He is lodging with Simon, a tanner, whose house is by the sea. He will tell you what you must do” (Acts 10:5–6). Peter obeyed God’s direction, went to Cornelius’ house, and began to speak the gospel. While Peter was still speaking, the Holy Spirit came upon everyone there, showing that God had accepted the Gentiles as well. Seeing this, Peter said, “In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality. But in every nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him” (Acts 10:34–35). That was the first clears moment when the gospel reached the Gentiles, and it came through Peter’s preaching, not Paul’s.
Paul’s calling came afterwards in Acts chapter 9. When the Lord spoke to Ananias about Saul, He said, “Go, for he is a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel” (Acts 9:15). So yes, Paul was chosen to go to the Gentiles too, but that hapened after Peter had already been sent and had already preached to them. Paul later became the main apostle traveling among Gentile nations, but the door had been opened first through Peter’s obedience.
I was trying to point out you had the two backwards, Pauls calling did not come AFTER Peters in Chapter 10, Pauls calling was before Peters in Chapter 9 (as far as the Gentiles go). I would say both were on equal footing there not knowing they would be going to the Gentiles even when Jesus would tell them things it sometimes did not compute, and obviously that was the case with Peter.